Lay advisor interventions for hypertension outcomes: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis and a RE-AIM evaluation.

Introduction: Lay advisor interventions improve hypertension outcomes; however, the added benefits and relevant factors for their widespread implementation into health systems are unknown. We performed a systematic review to: (1) summarize the benefits of adding lay advisors to interventions on hypertension outcomes, and (2) summarize factors associated with successful implementation in health systems using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Methods: We systematically searched several databases, including Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO from January 1981 to May 2023. All study designs of interventions delivered solely by lay advisors for adults with hypertension were eligible. If both arms received the lay advisor intervention, the study arm with lower intensity was assigned as the low-intensity intervention. Results: We included 41 articles, of which 22 were RCTs, from 7,267 screened citations. Studies predominantly included socially disadvantaged populations. Meta-analysis (9 RCTs; n = 4,220) of eligible lay advisor interventions reporting outcomes showed improved systolic blood pressure (BP) [-3.72 mm Hg (CI -6.1 to -1.3; I2 88%)], and diastolic BP [-1.7 mm Hg (CI -1 to -0.9; I2 7%)] compared to control group. Pooled effect from six RCTs (n = 3,277) comparing high-intensity with low-intensity lay advisor interventions showed improved systolic BP of -3.6 mm Hg (CI -6.7 to -0.5; I2 82.7%) and improved diastolic BP of -2.1 mm Hg (CI -3.7 to -0.4; I2 70.9%) with high-intensity interventions. No significant difference in pooled odds of hypertension control was noted between lay advisor intervention and control groups, or between high-intensity and low-intensity intervention groups. Most studies used multicomponent interventions with no stepped care elements or reporting of efficacious components. Indicators of external validity (adoption, implementation, maintenance) were infrequently reported. Discussion: Lay advisor interventions improve hypertension outcomes, with high intensity interventions having a greater impact. Further studies need to identify successful intervention and implementation factors of multicomponent interventions for stepped upscaling within healthcare system settings as well as factors used to help sustain interventions.

Skills and competencies in health data analytics for health professionals: a scoping review protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Healthcare data analytics is a methodological approach to the systematic analysis of health data, and it provides opportunities for healthcare professionals to improve health system management, patient engagement, budgeting, planning and performing evidence-based decision-making. Literature suggests that certain skills and/or competencies for health professionals working with big data in health care would be required. A review of the skills and competencies in health data analytics required by health professionals is needed to support the development or re-engineering of curriculum for health professionals to ensure they develop the abilities to make evidence-based decisions that ultimately can lead to the effective and efficient functioning of a healthcare system. METHODS: Using Arksey and O'Malley's framework, this study will review literature published in English from January 2012 to December 2022. The database search includes Academic Search Complete, CINAHL, and MEDLINE via EBSCOhost, PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, and Taylor and Francis. The reference lists of key studies will be searched to identify additional appropriate studies to include. The review will be conducted using an inclusion and exclusion criteria. Iterative processes will be involved at the various stages of search strategy piloting, screening and data extraction. Articles will be reviewed through a two-step process (title and abstract, and full-text review) by at least two reviewers. Data will be described quantitatively and/or qualitatively and presented in diagrams and tables. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical clearance has been received, and strict protocol measures will be followed to ensure the data reported is of quality and relevant to the review purpose. The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed scientific journal, presentation at national and/or international conferences, and other platforms such as social media (eg, LinkedIn, Twitter), and relevant stakeholders.

Safety and Efficacy of Sofosbuvir and Daclatasvir for Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Patients with ß-Thalassemia Major.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: ß-thalassemia major patients are susceptible to Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection owing to life-long dependency for blood-transfusion. Moreover, this patient population is at risk of progression of liver fibrosis or development of cirrhosis as a consequence of both iron overload and HCV infection. Hence, this study was carried out to evaluate efficacy and safety of the combination regimen of sofosbuvir and daclatasvir for HCV infection in ß-thalassemia major patients. METHODS: The present study was a prospective observational study which enrolled multi-transfused ß-thalassemia major patients treated with a combination regimen of sofosbuvir (400 mg) and daclatasvir (60 mg) daily for 12 weeks for HCV infection during May 2016 and November 2016 depending upon inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study. Sustained virological response at post-treatment week-12 (SVR-12) was defined as negative HCV-RNA at week-12 after completion of antiviral treatment. RESULTS: A total of 10 multi-transfused patients with ß-thalassemia major were included in the study. Average age of the patient was 13.60 ± 4.38 years. All the included patients were treatment-naïve, non-cirrhotic and infected with HCV genotype-3. All the patients achieved SVR-12. There was significant reduction in aspartate aminotransferase (p = 0.005) and alanine aminotransferase level (p = 0.005) and serum ferritin level (p = 0.028) after completion of the antiviral treatment. The reported adverse events include nausea, vomiting and anorexia which were managed conservatively. None of the patient required dose reduction or termination of antiviral treatment. CONCLUSION: The study reports safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir-based treatment in non-cirrhotic, treatment-naive ß-thalassemia major patients infected with HCV genotype-3. However, further studies with larger patient populations are needed to build up stronger evidence of safety and efficacy of this treatment approach for HCV infection in thalassemic patients.

Efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir-based therapy for chronic hepatitis C infection in "real-life" cohort.

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir-based treatment (sofosbuvir and ribavirin with or without pegylated interferon-α) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has been established in clinical trials. However, there is limited data regarding safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir-based treatment for HCV infection in a "real-life" cohort. We describe our experience with sofosbuvir-based treatment for HCV infection in a real-life cohort. METHODS: This was a prospective, nonrandomized and observational study at a tertiary care centre in Surat, India. The primary end-point was proportion of the study patients who achieved a sustained virological response 12 weeks after cessation of treatment (SVR 12). Secondary end-points of the study include SVR 4, virological relapse and appearance of adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients with chronic HCV who received sofosbuvir-based treatment were included in the study. During study period, two patients died due to severity of liver complications. Hence, overall rate of SVR 4 and SVR 12 was 98.1 % (n = 103/105) and 94.3 % (n = 99/105), respectively. Among 67 patients with HCV genotype-3 infection, the SVR 12 rate was 92.5 % (n = 62/67), and among 38 patients with HCV genotype-1 infection, the rate of SVR 12 was 97.4 % (n=37/38). A total of 32 (29.9 %) patients reported adverse events during the course of sofosbuvir-based treatment. None of the patient discontinued treatment due to adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: Sofosbuvir-based treatment is safe and efficacious in clinical practice in Indian patients with HCV genotype-1 and genotype-3 infection.