Comparison of Superior Capsular Reconstruction and Partial Infraspinatus Repair: A Matched-Pair Analysis of Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears.

BACKGROUND: Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) represents a new option for the treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tears. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiologic outcomes of SCR and compare them with the outcomes of partial repair (PR) of the infraspinatus tendon. The hypothesis was that there would be no significant differences between the clinical and radiologic outcome parameters of SCR and PR after a minimum follow-up of 2 years. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Of 21 patients who underwent SCR, 20 patients were matched in a 1:1 ratio according to sex, age, and tear configuration with 20 of 60 patients who had undergone PR; all patients were prospectively evaluated for a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The investigated outcome measures included the Constant score; Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) index; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score; and radiologic analysis of acromiohumeral distance (AHD) and humeral head centralization (HHC). RESULTS: There were no differences in the demographic data between the SCR and PR groups. The mean age of both groups was 62.3 years (range, 47-79 years), the mean tear configuration was Bateman 3.0 and Patte 2.8, and the mean follow-up period was 29.4 months (range, 24-53 months). At final follow-up, no significant differences were seen between the SCR and PR groups with regard to Constant score (77.1 vs 82.7), age- and sex-adapted Constant score (85.5% vs 91.4%), DASH score (15.6 vs 7.8), or WORC index (81.1 vs 90.4). No significant differences in the AHD or HHC were seen between the groups. The reoperation rate was 4.8% (1/21) in the SCR cohort and 15% (9/60) in the PR cohort. CONCLUSION: Both SCR and PR resulted in significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes at 2-year follow-up, with no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the 2 techniques. Further follow-up is needed to determine whether there are long-term differences in HHC and development of cuff tear arthropathy. Further investigations should also focus on the cost-effectiveness of the respective procedures.

Repair and augmentation of the lateral collateral ligament complex using internal bracing in dislocations and fracture dislocations of the elbow restores stability and allows early rehabilitation.

PURPOSE: Most elbow dislocations can be treated conservatively, with surgery indicated in special circumstances. Surgical options, apart from fracture fixation, range from repair or reconstruction of the damaged ligaments to static external fixation, usually entailing either a long period of immobilization followed by carefully monitored initiation of movement or dynamic external fixation. In general, no consensus regarding surgical treatment has been reached. A new method of open ligament repair and augmentation of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament using a non-absorbable suture tape in cases of acute and subacute elbow instability following dislocations has been described here, which allows an early, brace-free initiation of the full range of motion. This is the first description of the technique of internal bracing of the lateral elbow with preliminary patient outcome parameters for acute treatment of posterolateral rotatory instability. METHODS: Seventeen patients (14 males and 3 females) with acute or subacute posterolateral elbow instability as a result of dislocation or fracture dislocation were treated in our centre (Sporthopaedicum, Straubing, Regensburg, Germany) from 2014 to 2015 with open LUCL re-fixation and non-absorbable suture tape augmentation. The elbows were actively mobilized immediately after the operation and a maximum bracing period of 3 days. RESULTS: At 10 month median follow-up, none of the patients showed clinically apparent signs of instability or suffered subluxation or re-dislocation. One patient required re-operation for heterotopic ossification. The median range of motion was from 10° (0-40) to 130° (90-50) and median Oxford, Mayo Elbow Performance score, Simple Elbow Value, and DASH Scores were 41(29-48), 100 (70-100), 83% (60-95), and 18.5 (1.6-66), respectively. All patients reported a complete return to pre-injury level of activity. CONCLUSION: Augmentation with a non-absorbable suture tape acting as an 'Internal Brace' following an elbow dislocation is a safe adjunct to primary ligament repair and may allow the early mobilization and recovery of elbow stability and range of motion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

A Case of Simultaneous Traumatic Dorsal Dislocation of All Five Metatarsophalangeal Joints Treated Successfully With Closed Reduction.

Simultaneous dislocation of multiple metatarsophalangeal joints is a rare injury, because of the impediment presented by the anatomy of the lesser metatarsophalangeal joints. To the best of our knowledge, only 1 case of simultaneous dislocation of all 5 metatarsophalangeal joints has been previously reported in peer-reviewed studies. Owing to the same anatomic structures that obstruct relocation, closed reduction has been known to fail in a large proportion of cases. We report a case of simultaneous dorsal dislocation of all 5 metatarsophalangeal joints of the right foot after a motor vehicle accident. The highlight of our case was successful closed reduction after application of the reduction maneuver to all lesser metatarsophalangeal joints simultaneously in the second attempt with the patient under anesthesia. On confirming the stability of the reduction, the foot was immobilized in a short-leg, posterior slab cast for 3 weeks without placing Kirschner wires across the joints. At the 3-month follow-up evaluation, the patient had reacquired their preinjury level of activity with a good range of motion . At the 2-year follow-up evaluation, this range of motion was maintained with no radiologic evidence of arthrosis. We have inferred that the reduction was successful the second time because the maneuver freed the soft tissue structures from the contiguous impingement in the metatarsophalangeal joints by the exact reversal of the mode of injury using simultaneous application of the maneuver to all the lesser metatarsophalangeal joints. We encourage a trial of this modification of the closed reduction method in the emergency setting before proceeding to open reduction, because the results of closed reduction can be biologically rewarding without the risks associated with open surgical dissection.