Trajectories of functional and structural myocardial parameters in post-COVID-19 syndrome-insights from mid-term follow-up by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Introduction: Myocardial tissue alterations in patients with post-Coronavirus disease 2019 syndrome (PCS) are often subtle and mild. Reports vary in the prevalence of non-ischemic and ischemic injuries as well as the extent of ongoing myocardial inflammation. The exact relevance of these myocardial alterations is not fully understood. This study aimed at describing the trajectories of myocardial alterations in PCS patients by mid-term follow-up with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). Methods: This study entails a retrospective analysis of symptomatic PCS patients referred for follow-up CMR between August 2020 and May 2023 due to mildly affected or reduced left or right ventricular function (LV and RV, respectively) and structural myocardial alterations, e.g., focal and diffuse fibrosis, on baseline scans. Follow-up CMR protocol consisted of cine images and full coverage native T1 and T2 mapping. Baseline and follow-up scans were compared using t-tests or Wilcoxon tests. Post-hoc analysis was carried out in a subgroup based on the change of LV stroke volume (SV) between scans. Results: In total, 43 patients [median age (interquartile range) 46 (37-56) years, 33 women] received follow-ups 347 (167-651) days after initial diagnosis. A decrease in symptoms was recorded on follow-ups (p < 0.03) with 23 patients being asymptomatic at follow-ups [symptomatic at baseline 43/43 (100%) vs. symptomatic at follow-up 21/43 (49%), p < 0.001]. Functional improvement was noted for LV-SV [83.3 (72.7-95.0) vs. 84.0 (77.0-100.3) ml; p = 0.045], global radial [25.3% (23.4%-27.9%) vs. 27.4% (24.4%-33.1%); p < 0.001], and circumferential strains [-16.5% (-17.5% to -15.6%) vs. -17.2% (-19.5% to -16.1%); p < 0.001]. In total, 17 patients had an LV-SV change >10% on follow-up scans (5 with a decrease and 12 with an increase), with LV-SV, RV-SV, and global longitudinal strain being discriminatory variables on baseline scans (p = 0.01, 0.02, and 0.04, respectively). T1- or T2-analysis revealed no changes, remaining within normal limits. Conclusion: Symptomatic load as well as blood pressures decreased on follow-up. CMR did not detect significant changes in tissue parameters; however, volumetric, specifically LV-SV, and deformation indexes improved during mid-term follow-up.

Different Impacts on the Heart After COVID-19 Infection and Vaccination: Insights From Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

Introduction: Myocarditis-like findings after COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) infection and vaccination were reported by applying cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). These results are very heterogenous and dependent on several factors such as hospital admission or outpatient treatment, timing of CMR, and symptomatic load. This retrospective study aimed to identify differences in myocardial damage in patients with persistent symptoms both after COVID-19 infection and vaccine by applying CMR. Materials and Methods: This study entails a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients referred for CMR between August 2020 and November 2021 with persistent symptoms after COVID-19 infection or vaccination. Patients were compared to healthy controls (HC). All patients underwent a CMR examination in a 1.5-T scanner with a scan protocol including: cine imaging for biventricular function and strain assessment using feature tracking, T2 mapping for the quantification of edema, and T1 mapping for diffuse fibrosis and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) for the detection and quantification of focal fibrosis. Patients were divided into a subacute COVID-19 (sCov) group with symptoms lasting < 12 weeks, post-COVID-19 (pCov) group with symptoms > 12 weeks, and patients after COVID-19 vaccination (CovVac). Results: A total of 162 patients were recruited of whom 141 were included for analysis. The median age in years (interquartile range (IQR)) of the entire cohort was 45 (37-56) which included 83 women and 58 men. Subgroups were as follows (total patients per subgroup, median age in years (IQR), main gender): 34 sCov, 43 (37-52), 19 women; 63 pCov, 52 (39-58), 43 women; 44 CovVac, 43 (32-56), 23 men; 44 HC (41 (28-52), 24 women). The biventricular function was preserved and revealed no differences between the groups. No active inflammation was detected by T2 mapping. Global T1 values were higher in pCov in comparison with HC (median (IQR) in ms: pCov 1002ms (981-1023) vs. HC 987ms (963-1009; p = 0.005) with other parings revealing no differences. In 49/141 (34.6%) of patients, focal fibrosis was detectable with the majority having a non-ischemic pattern (43/141; 30.4%; patients) with the subgroups after infection having more often a subepicardial pattern compared with CovVac (total (% of group): sCov: 7/34(21%); pCov 13/63(21%); CovVac 2/44(5%); p = 0.04). Conclusion: Patients after COVID-19 infection showed more focal fibrosis in comparison with patients after COVID-19 vaccination without alterations in the biventricular function.