Microsurgical clipping versus endovascular therapy for treating patients with middle cerebral artery aneurysms presenting with neurological ischemic symptoms.

Studies comparing different treatment methods in patients with middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms in different subgroups of onset symptoms are lacking. It is necessary to explore the safety and efficacy of open surgical treatment and endovascular therapy in patients with MCA aneurysms in a specific population. This study aimed to compare microsurgical clipping versus endovascular therapy regarding complication rates and outcomes in patients with MCA aneurysms presenting with neurological ischemic symptoms. This was a retrospective cohort study in which 9656 patients with intracranial aneurysms were screened between January 2014 and July 2022. Further, 130 eligible patients were enrolled. The primary outcome was the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) within 30 days of treatment, whereas secondary outcomes included postprocedural target vessel-related stroke, disabling stroke or death, mortality, and aneurysm occlusion rate. Among the 130 included patients, 45 were treated with endovascular therapy and 85 with microsurgical clipping. The primary outcome of the incidence of SAEs within 30 days of treatment was significantly higher in the clipping group [clipping: 23.5%(20/85) vs endovascular: 8.9%(4/45), adjusted OR:4.05, 95% CI:1.20-13.70; P = 0.024]. The incidence of any neurological complications related to the treatment was significantly higher in the clipping group [clipping:32.9%(28/85) vs endovascular:15.6%(7/45); adjusted OR:3.49, 95%CI:1.18-10.26; P = 0.023]. Postprocedural target vessel-related stroke, disabling stroke or death, mortality rate, and complete occlusion rate did not differ significantly between the two groups. Endovascular therapy seemed to be safer in treating patients with MCA aneurysms presenting with neurological ischemic symptoms compared with microsurgical clipping, with a significantly lower incidence of SAEs within 30 days of treatment and any neurological complications related to the treatment during follow-up.

Complications after endovascular treatment of large basilar trunk aneurysms.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Large basilar trunk aneurysms (BTAs) have a poor natural history if left untreated and always pose a significant challenge to endovascular treatment. The present study aimed to analyze the complications after endovascular treatment of large BTAs. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational, cohort study. Between January 2015 and September 2022, 9116 patients with intracranial aneurysms came to our institution for management, of which 34 patients with 34 large (≥10 mm) BTAs were treated with endovascular treatment. Postprocedural complications, clinical, and angiographic outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: All 34 patients (34 aneurysms) were successfully treated, of which 13 aneurysms were treated with flow diversion (FD), and 21 aneurysms were treated with stent-assisted coiling. Neurological complications occurred in 12 (35.3%) patients, with 7 (20.6%) deaths. Ischemic complications occurred in 10 (29.4%) patients, and 4 (11.8%) patients experienced hemorrhagic events. The incidences of favorable outcomes at discharge and last follow-up were 85.3% and 75.8%, respectively. The cumulative survival rates at 1 and 3 years were 86.5% and 71.4%, respectively. Unilateral vertebral artery sacrifice was associated with postprocedural complications (hazard ratio: 3.74, 95% confidence interval: 1.06-13.25, p = 0.041). The postprocedural complication rates were comparable between patients treated with FD and stent-assisted coiling (5/13, 38.5% vs. 7/21, 33.3%, p > 0.99). Angiography follow-up was available for 21 patients, and complete aneurysm occlusion was observed in 16/21 (76.2%) aneurysms. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular treatment might be a feasible option for treating large BTAs. However, clinicians should be alerted to procedure-related complications, especially ischemic complications that cause disability or death. Unilateral vertebral artery sacrifice might be associated with postprocedural complications.