Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
International Eye Science ; (12): 1089-1092, 2018.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) | ID: wpr-695380

RESUMO

· AIM:To compare the clinical curative effect of triamcinolone acetonide and Ranibizumab on diffuse diabetic macular edema (DME).· METHODS:We collected 84 cases of patients with diffuse DME treated in our hospital from February 2016 to May 2017.According to 1:1 matching method,they were divided into Ⅰ,Ⅱ groups.They were all treated with laser photocoagulation.Preoperative auxiliary application of triamcinolone acetonide was given to Group Ⅰ,while Group Ⅱ received preoperative application of ranibizumab.After treatment,the efficacy of the two groups were analyzed and compared.· RESULTS:The total clinical efficiency of Group Ⅱ at 3mo after treatment was 93%,higher than that of Group Ⅰ (77%;x2 =4.981,P =0.025).Compared with before treatment,BCVA and CMT of the two groups at each time after treatment were significantly improved (P< 0.05).BCVA of Group Ⅱ at 1 and 3mo after treatment was better than that of Group Ⅰ (P<0.05);CMT of Group Ⅱ at 1,3 and 6mo after treatment improved more than that of Group Ⅰ,with significant difference (P < 0.05);occurrence rate of adverse reactions Group Ⅰ and Group Ⅱ were 17% and 13% with no significant statistical difference (X2 =0.243,P=0.621).There were no serious adverse reactions such as retinal detachment,endophthalmitis or cataract in the two groups.· CONCLUSION:Compared with triamcinolone acetonide,the effect of ranibizumab on diffuse diabetic macular edema is better,and has high clinical value.

2.
International Eye Science ; (12): 1344-1347, 2014.
Artigo em Chinês | WPRIM (Pacífico Ocidental) | ID: wpr-642013

RESUMO

AlM: To explore the different ages of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in infants, take different treatment methods at different times. METHODS:The 87 cases of 102 children were divided into three different age groups: the first group of 25d-3mo of age 21 cases 26 eyes; The second group >3mo-7mo 31 cases 36 eyes;The third group >7-24mo of age 35 cases 40 eyes. For the first group of infants, the implementation of the lacrimal sac nasolacrimal duct massage + eye drops; for the second group of infants, carry lacrimal pressure washing treatment; for the third group of infants, the implementation of the nasolacrimal duct probing treatment. RESULTS: The first group of children through the nasolacrimal duct sac massage + drops tobramycin eye drops treatment unobstructed 12, the cure rate was 46. 2%;The second group of children through pressurized irrigation treatment lacrimal patency by 33, the cure rate was 91. 7%; The third group of children through the nasolacrimal duct probing unobstructed 36 treatment, the cure rate was 90. 0%. The second and third group were better than the first group (χ2=15. 71, P0. 05). CONCLUSlON:lnfants with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction should distinguish between ages, taking different treatments, in order to obtain a better therapeutic effect, and lacrimal pressure washing is the preferred way of treating infants with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...