Laparoscopic examination of the traumatized spleen with blood salvage for autotransfusion.

The management of splenic trauma presents a dilemma to the surgeon, who must weigh the risks of operative versus nonoperative management. Laparoscopy has been used increasingly for trauma cases to decrease the morbidity associated with standard laparotomy. Autotransfusion of the patient's shed blood has also become widespread to decrease the risks associated with transfusion. We describe the case of a 15-year-old male with blunt splenic trauma, in which laparoscopy was used to examine the spleen to ascertain the need for operative treatment, to look for other intra-abdominal injuries, and to salvage intraperitoneal blood for autotransfusion. In this case, laparoscopy determined that laparotomy would be nontherapeutic, and that autotransfusion could obviate the need for banked-blood transfusion.

Management of splenic trauma at a rural, Level I trauma center.

The spleen is the most commonly injured organ in blunt abdominal trauma. There remains much controversy in the diagnosis and management of the injured spleen, with a recent trend toward nonoperative management. A 5-year period was reviewed at a rural, Level I trauma center to address issues of operative versus nonoperative management. During this time period, there were 136 patients identified as having trauma to the spleen. Most (95%) were the result of blunt trauma, and a majority of these were from motor vehicle accidents. Computed tomography was the most frequent method of diagnosis. Approximately half of the patients underwent immediate operative intervention. Of those initially observed, 10 patients (16%) eventually were operated on. Most of the cases were due to underestimation of the severity of the splenic injury, and most received blood transfusion. This experience suggests that observation for splenic trauma is appropriate in many cases, as long as the surgeon is certain the spleen is not actively bleeding and the patient will not require blood transfusion.

Pulmonary function after non-heart-beating lung donation in a survival model.

BACKGROUND: Lung procurement from recently deceased cadavers has been suggested to enlarge the limited donor pool. We hypothesized that lungs harvested from non-heart-beating donors (NHBD) would function as well as those harvested from heart-beating donors. METHODS: Sixteen adult swine underwent left lung allotransplantation. Controls received lungs procured from heart-beating donors, NHBD pigs received lungs immediately harvested from donors after death from asphyxiation, and NHBD-15 and NHBD-30 pigs received lungs harvested after 15 and 30 minutes after asphyxiation. RESULTS: After 1 week of survival, mean dynamic airway compliance (mL/cm H2O +/- standard error of the mean) was 16.3 +/- 0.7 in controls, and 17.3 +/- 1.0, 16.4 +/- 6.0, and 7.3 +/- 1.6 in the NHBD, NHBD-15, and NHBD-30 groups, respectively (p = 0.02, NHBD-30 versus others combined). No significant differences were noted in the pulmonary venous partial pressure of oxygen or pulmonary vascular hemodynamics compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: The decrease in airway compliance noted in the NHBD-30 group may reflect an exacerbation of reperfusion injury caused by 30 minutes of warm ischemia during organ retrieval. We conclude that posttransplantation lung function using an NHBD with up to 15 minutes of warm ischemia is equivalent to lung function after heart-beating harvest.