Luteal phase support in intrauterine insemination cycles: a prospective randomized study of 300 mg versus 600 mg intravaginal progesterone tablet.

Vaginal progesterone (P) has been suggested to be used for luteal phase support (LPS) in controlled ovarian stimulation (COH)-intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles, however, no concensus exists about the best P dose. Therefore, considering the fecundability rate as the primary end point, our main objective was to find the optimal dose of P in COH-IUI cycles, comparing the two groups of women, each of which comprised of 100 women either on 300 mg or 600 mg of intravaginal P tablets, in a prospective randomized study design. The mean age of the women, duration of infertility, basal and day of hCG injection hormone levels in the female and sperm parameters were similar in the two study groups. Also, duration and dose of gonadotropin given, number of follicles, endometrial thickness, the total, ongoing and multiple pregnancy rates were comparable in both groups. We, therefore, claim that 300 mg of intravaginal micronized P should be the maximum dose of LPS in IUI cycles.

Luteal phase support with estrogen in addition to progesterone increases pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization cycles with poor response to gonadotropins.

In this study, our objective was to determine the effect of adding estradiol hemihydrate (E2) to progestin (P) for luteal phase support on pregnancy outcome in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles with poor response to gonadotropins. Ninety-five women with poor ovarian response who underwent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) with gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist or GnRH antagonist plus gonadotropin protocol for IVF were prospectively randomized into three groups of luteal phase support after oocyte retrieval. Group 1 (n = 33) received only intravaginal progesterone gel (Crinone 8% gel). Group 2 (n = 27) and Group 3 (n = 35) received intravaginal progesterone plus oral 2 and 6 mg estradiol hemihydrate, respectively. Main outcome measures were overall and clinical pregnancy rates (PRs) per patient. Serum LH, E2 and P levels at 7th and 14th days of luteal phase were also measured. Overall and clinical PRs were significantly higher in 2 mg E2 + P than P-only group (44% versus 18% and 37% versus 12.1%, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences between 6 mg E2 + P versus P-only and 2 mg E2 + P versus 6 mg E2 + P groups regarding PRs. Addition of 2 mg/day E2 in addition to P for luteal support significantly increase overall and clinical PRs in cycles with poor response to gonadotropins after IVF.