Pain Plan Implementation Effect: Analysis of Postoperative Opioid Use, Hospital Length of Stay, and Clinic Resource Utilization for Patients Undergoing Elective Spine Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: The Pain Plan was developed collaboratively and implemented a unique systematic approach to reduce opioid usage in elective spine surgery. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study comparing patients who underwent elective spine surgery before and after Pain Plan implementation. The Pain Plan was implemented on May 1, 2019. The experimental group comprised patients over the subsequent 1-year period with a Pain Plan (n = 319), and the control group comprised patients from the previous year without a Pain Plan (n = 385). Outcome variables include hospital length of stay (LOS), inpatient opioid use, outpatient opioid prescription quantities, number of clinic communication encounters, and communication encounter complexity. Patients were prospectively divided into three surgical invasiveness index subgroups representing small-magnitude, medium-magnitude, and large-magnitude spine surgeries. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant decrease in hospital LOS ( P = 0.028), inpatient opioid use ( P = 0.001), and the average number of steps per communication encounter ( P = 0.010) for Pain Plan patients and a trend toward decreased outpatient opioid prescription quantities ( P = 0.052). No difference was observed in patient-reported pain scores. Statistically significant decreases in inpatient opioid use were seen in large-magnitude (50% reduction, P < 0.001) and medium-magnitude surgeries (49% reduction, P < 0.001). For small-magnitude surgeries, there was no difference (1.7% reduction, P = 0.99). The median LOS for large-magnitude surgeries decreased by 38% (20.5-hour decrease, P < 0.001) and decreased by 34% for medium-magnitude surgeries (17-hour difference, P = 0.055). For small-magnitude surgeries, there was no significant difference ( P = 0.734). Outpatient opioid prescription quantities were markedly decreased in small-magnitude surgeries only. The total number of communication encounters was not statistically significant in any group. However, the number of steps within a communication encounter was significantly decreased ( P = 0.010), and staff survey respondents reported more efficient and effective postoperative pain management for Pain Plan patients. DISCUSSION: Pain Plan implementation markedly decreased hospital LOS, inpatient opioid use and outpatient opioid prescription quantities, and clinic resource utilization in elective spine surgery patients.

A Multicenter Evaluation of the Feasibility, Patient/Provider Satisfaction, and Value of Virtual Spine Consultation During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility, patient/provider satisfaction, and perceived value of telehealth spine consultation after rapid conversion from traditional in-office visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Data were obtained for patients undergoing telehealth visits with spine surgeons in the first 3 weeks after government restriction of elective surgical care at 4 sites (March 23, 2020, to April 17, 2020). Demographic factors, technique-specific elements of the telehealth experience, provider confidence in diagnostic and therapeutic assessment, patient/surgeon satisfaction, and perceived value were collected. RESULTS: A total of 128 unique visits were analyzed. New (74 [58%]), preoperative (26 [20%]), and postoperative (28 [22%]) patients were assessed. A total of 116 (91%) visits had successful connection on the first attempt. Surgeons felt very confident 101 times (79%) when assessing diagnosis and 107 times (84%) when assessing treatment plan. The mean and median patient satisfaction was 89% and 94%, respectively. Patient satisfaction was significantly higher for video over audio-only visits (P < 0.05). Patient satisfaction was not significantly different with patient age, location of chief complaint (cervical or thoracolumbar), or visit type (new, preoperative, or postoperative). Providers reported that 76% of the time they would choose to perform the visit again in telehealth format. Sixty percent of patients valued the visit cost as the same or slightly less than an in-office consultation. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate the feasibility and high patient/provider satisfaction of virtual spine surgical consultation, and appropriate reimbursement and balanced regulation for spine telehealth care is essential to continue this existing work.

Fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous needle aspiration of posterior epidural abscesses: a report of two cases.

Introduction: Spinal epidural abscesses are most commonly treated with surgical decompression and antibiotics or in specific instances managed medically with antibiotic therapy alone. Image-guided percutaneous aspiration as an alternative to surgery has only rarely been reported in the literature. Case presentation: We report two cases of successful fluoroscopy-guided needle aspiration of posterior epidural abscesses. Case 1 is a 48-year-old man who presented with several days of escalating back pain and constitutional symptoms with MRI showing a posterior epidural abscess at L2-L3 causing spinal stenosis. The patient remained neurologically intact. Percutaneous needle aspiration of the collection provided dramatic pain relief with the aspirate growing methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. The patient made a full recovery on antibiotic therapy. Case 2 is an 81-year-old man who presented with worsening upper back pain and was found to have osteomyelitis/discitis with a large posterior epidural abscess in the thoracic spine. Needle drainage was performed with the sample growing Bacteroides fragilis. This patient also responded successfully to nonsurgical management with full recovery after appropriate antibiotic therapy. Discussion: In carefully selected patients, image-guided needle aspiration of posterior epidural abscesses may be a viable and less invasive alternative to surgery.