Case report: Safety of Tumor Treating Fields therapy with an implantable cardiac pacemaker in a patient with glioblastoma.

Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy is an anti-cancer treatment modality that is delivered noninvasively to the tumor site via skin-placed arrays. The therapy is US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved and Conformité Européenne (CE) marked for adults with newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) (grade 4 glioma in the European Union). To date, there are limited data on the safety and efficacy of TTFields therapy in patients with implanted cardiac pacemakers. Herein, we report a case of a 79-year-old male patient with GBM receiving TTFields therapy with a prior medical history of cardiac events necessitating a cardiac pacemaker. The patient presented to the emergency department in May 2021 with newly onset left-sided weakness along with seizures. Based on an initial evaluation and results of the initial computed tomography (CT) scans (May 2021), the patient was clinically diagnosed with a high-grade glioma which was later confirmed as IDH wildtype following a biopsy. He was treated with radiotherapy (40 Gy in 15 fractions), followed by adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) (75 mg/m2). TTFields therapy was initiated alongside maintenance TMZ (150 mg/m2). Average TTFields therapy usage was 67% throughout the duration of treatment. Follow-up CT scans (February and May of 2022) indicated stable disease. CT scans in August 2022 showed an increase in size of a mass with heterogeneous contrast enhancement and the patient subsequently passed away in October 2022. The patient's last cardiac tests demonstrated that the pacemaker was operational with adequate cardiac function. This report suggests that TTFields therapy concomitant with an implanted electronic device may be safe in patients with GBM.

Effectiveness of gabapentin in reducing opioid requirements after radiation in head and neck cancer in a single institution.

BACKGROUND: Gabapentin has been shown to reduce opioid use in head and neck cancer patients. Here, we examine the efficacy of prophylactic gabapentin at reducing opioid use in these patients at our institution. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients receiving radiation was performed, using patients from our previous study as controls. Risk factors for opioid use at 3 and 6 months were determined using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: In total, 53/185 patients were treated with gabapentin, 39.6% of which took opioids at 3 months vs. 58.3% in the non-gabapentin cohort (p = 0.021). Gabapentin was independently associated with less opioid use on multivariate analysis at 3 months (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.24-0.9). Gastrostomy tube dependence and pretreatment opioid use were associated with chronic opioid use despite gabapentin. CONCLUSIONS: Gabapentin is effective at expediting opioid tapering in head and neck cancer patients who are not gastrostomy tube dependent or taking opioids pretreatment.

Implications of Treatment Modality on Chronic Opioid Use Following Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between treatment modality and chronic opioid use in a large cohort of patients with head and neck cancer. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single academic center. METHODS: There were 388 patients with head and neck cancer treated between January 2011 and December 2017 who met inclusion criteria. Clinical risk factors for opioid use at 3 and 6 months were determined with univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The prevalence of opioid use was 43.0% at 3 months and 33.2% at 6 months. On multivariate analysis, primary chemoradiation (odds ratio [OR], 4.04; 95% CI, 1.91-8.55) and surgery with adjuvant chemoradiation (OR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.09-5.26) were associated with opioid use at 3 months. Additional risk factors at that time point included pretreatment opioid use (OR, 7.63; 95% CI, 4.09-14.21) and decreasing age (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.06). At 6 months, primary chemoradiation (OR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.34-4.28), pretreatment opioid use (OR, 5.86; 95% CI, 3.30-10.38), current tobacco use (OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.18-3.40), and psychiatric disorder (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.02-3.14) were associated with opioid use. CONCLUSION: Of the patients who receive different treatment modalities, those receiving primary chemoradiation are independently at highest risk for chronic opioid use. Other risk factors include pretreatment opioid use, tobacco use, and a psychiatric disorder. In an effort to reduce their risk of chronic opioid use, preventative strategies should be especially directed to these patients.

Chemorefractory liver metastasis from cervical cancer successfully treated with a combination of yttrium-90 and immunotherapy.

Liver metastases in cervical cancer is rare and can be difficult-to-treat. The current guidelines established by the Gynecologic Oncology Group recommend platinum-based systemic chemotherapy in combination with an anti-angiogenic agent such as bevacizumab, however, overall survival remains poor following diagnosis and options for patients who fail chemotherapy are limited. Yttrium-90 (Y90) radioembolization (RE) has shown great promise in the treatment of chemo-refractory colorectal liver metastases. We describe a 30-year-old female with a history of stage IB endocervical adenocarcinoma who later developed metastases to the liver, that were unresponsive to multiple chemotherapeutics and chemoembolization, and was successfully treated with Y90 RE with concurrent systemic Pembrolizumab. The Y90 RE treatment resulted in positive clinical and imaging responses with improvement in her quality of life, all of which continue to persist at the time of writing this manuscript about 8-months into her RE treatment.

In support of the Choosing Wisely campaign: Perceived higher risk leads to unnecessary imaging in accelerated partial breast irradiation?

Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is an increasingly utilized modality for early stage breast cancer as part of breast conservation therapy (BCT). There remains concern regarding local recurrence, requiring more frequent post-radiation surveillance imaging. The purpose of this study is to determine clinical significance of frequent surveillance in this perceived higher risk population. Patients treated at a community academic medical center from 2005 to 2013 with partial breast radiation were retrospectively identified. All patients were treated with lumpectomy followed by balloon based APBI. Diagnostic, clinical, radiographic, and outcomes data were collected. One hundred and sixty-nine patients were identified. Median age at time of diagnosis was 63. Stage was 0, I, and II in 27%, 64%, and 9%, respectively. Most patients had pure invasive ductal cancer. Ninety-two percent and 99% of patients had imaging performed by 6 and 12 months (± 3 months) respectively. Median interval between end of radiation and first image, and subsequent 3 images were 6, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively. Median follow-up was 49 months for all patients (range 7-106). Six patients experienced local recurrence: 4 invasive, all clinically detected, and none within the first 2 years. One patient had mammographically detected recurrent ductal carcinoma in situ. No mammographic images within the first year lead to diagnosis of recurrent cancer. APBI via balloon base brachytherapy offered women excellent locoregional control rates. Frequent mammographic surveillance did not result in increased detection of early recurrent disease. The result of our study are in line with the Choosing Wisely campaign recommendations to perform no more than annual follow-up for women who have completed radiation as part of BCT, with first imaging done at 6-12 months. We recommend mammographic surveillance be performed no more frequently than annually, with first image after BCT to be done 12 months from completion of radiation.

Long term radiographic findings of breast brachytherapy: Implications of surgical volume.

PURPOSE: Little is known about long-term radiographic findings after treatment with accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). METHODS: Univariate and multivariate analysis of factors leading to formation and resolution of seroma were performed in patients treated with lumpectomy and APBI. RESULTS: Post-treatment images of 129 patients were reviewed by one radiologist. Median surgical excision volume was 108.9 cc (range 20.5-681.9). Primary mode of imaging was mammogram. Median time from end of RT to first and last surveillance image was 6 and 54 months, respectively. Median number of images was 7 (range 3-12). Seroma was identified in 98 (76%) patients, with median maximum diameter of 3.9 cm. Forty (41%) patients experienced resolution of seroma, at a median time of 29 months (range 6-74). On univariate analysis, surgical excision volume was associated with seroma formation, and tumor stage and margin re-excision were significant on univariate and multivariate analysis. No factors were associated with seroma resolution. CONCLUSION: Seroma formation after APBI resolves around 2.5 years for many patients, but persists for others possibly due to primary tumor and surgical excision volumes. With revised criteria on the definition of positive margins, smaller volumes may lead to decreased risk of seroma formation for future patients.

Chest wall volume receiving >30 Gy predicts risk of severe pain and/or rib fracture after lung stereotactic body radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To identify the dose-volume parameters that predict the risk of chest wall (CW) pain and/or rib fracture after lung stereotactic body radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From a combined, larger multi-institution experience, 60 consecutive patients treated with three to five fractions of stereotactic body radiotherapy for primary or metastatic peripheral lung lesions were reviewed. CW pain was assessed using the Common Toxicity Criteria for pain. Peripheral lung lesions were defined as those located within 2.5 cm of the CW. A minimal point dose of 20 Gy to the CW was required. The CW volume receiving >or=20, >or=30, >or=40, >or=50, and >or=60 Gy was determined and related to the risk of CW toxicity. RESULTS: Of the 60 patients, 17 experienced Grade 3 CW pain and five rib fractures. The median interval to the onset of severe pain and/or fracture was 7.1 months. The risk of CW toxicity was fitted to the median effective concentration dose-response model. The CW volume receiving 30 Gy best predicted the risk of severe CW pain and/or rib fracture (R(2) = 0.9552). A volume threshold of 30 cm(3) was observed before severe pain and/or rib fracture was reported. A 30% risk of developing severe CW toxicity correlated with a CW volume of 35 cm(3) receiving 30 Gy. CONCLUSION: The development of CW toxicity is clinically relevant, and the CW should be considered an organ at risk in treatment planning. The CW volume receiving 30 Gy in three to five fractions should be limited to <30 cm(3), if possible, to reduce the risk of toxicity without compromising tumor coverage.