No benefit of additional treatment with exenatide in patients with an acute myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES: This double blinded, placebo controlled randomized clinical trial studies the effect of exenatide on myocardial infarct size. The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist exenatide has possible cardioprotective properties during reperfusion after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. METHODS: 191 patients were randomly assigned to intravenous exenatide or placebo initiated prior to percutaneous coronary intervention using 10µg/h for 30min followed by 0.84µg/h for 72h. Patients with a previous myocardial infarction, Trombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow 2 or 3, multi-vessel disease, or diabetes were excluded. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed to determine infarct size, area at risk (AAR) (using T2-weighted hyperintensity (T2W) and late enhancement endocardial surface area (ESA)). The primary endpoint was of 4-month final infarct size, corrected for the AAR measured in the acute phase using MRI. RESULTS: After exclusion, 91 patients (age 57.4±10.1years, 76% male) completed the protocol. There were no baseline differences between groups. No difference was found in infarct size corrected for the AAR in the exenatide group compared to the placebo group (37.1±18.8 vs. 39.3±20.1%, p=0.662). There was also no difference in infarct size (18.8±13.2 vs. 18.8±11.3% of left ventricular mass, p=0.965). No major adverse cardiac events occurred during the in-hospital phase. CONCLUSION: Exenatide did not reduce myocardial infarct size expressed as a percentage of AAR in ST elevated myocardial infarction patients successfully treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.

MAb therapy against the IFN-α/ß receptor subunit 1 stimulates arteriogenesis in a murine hindlimb ischaemia model without enhancing atherosclerotic burden.

AIMS: IFN-beta (IFNß) signalling is increased in patients with insufficient coronary collateral growth (i.e. arteriogenesis) and IFNß hampers arteriogenesis in mice. A downside of most pro-arteriogenic agents investigated in the past has been their pro-atherosclerotic properties, rendering them unsuitable for therapeutic application. Interestingly, type I IFNs have also been identified as pro-atherosclerotic cytokines and IFNß treatment increases plaque formation and accumulation of macrophages. We therefore hypothesized that mAb therapy to inhibit IFNß signalling would stimulate arteriogenesis and simultaneously attenuate-rather than aggravate-atherosclerosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a murine hindlimb ischaemia model, atherosclerotic low-density lipoprotein receptor knockout (LDLR(-/-)) mice were treated during a 4-week period with blocking MAbs specific for mouse IFN-α/ß receptor subunit 1 (IFNAR1) or murine IgG isotype as a control. The arteriogenic response was quantified using laser Doppler perfusion imaging (LDPI) as well as immunohistochemistry. Effects on atherosclerosis were determined by quantification of plaque area and analysis of plaque composition. Downstream targets of IFNß were assessed by real-time PCR (RT-PCR) in the aortic arch. Hindlimb perfusion restoration after femoral artery ligation was improved in mice treated with anti-IFNAR1 compared with controls as assessed by LDPI. This was accompanied by a decrease in CXCL10 expression in the IFNAR1 MAb-treated group. Anti-IFNAR1 treatment reduced plaque apoptosis without affecting total plaque area or other general plaque composition parameters. Results were confirmed in a short-term model and in apolipoprotein E knockout (APOE)(-/-) mice. CONCLUSION: Monoclonal anti-IFNAR1 therapy during a 4-week treatment period stimulates collateral artery growth in mice and did not enhance atherosclerotic burden. This is the first reported successful strategy using MAbs to stimulate arteriogenesis.