Epidural ropivacaine with fentanyl following major gynaecological surgery: the effect of volume and concentration on pain relief and motor impairment.

In a prospective, randomized, double-blind study, 40 patients undergoing gynaecological oncology surgery received either 0.1% ropivacaine with fentanyl 1 microgram ml-1 or 0.2% ropivacaine with fentanyl 2 micrograms ml-1. A PCEA pump was set to deliver ropivacaine 8 mg with fentanyl 8 micrograms with each successful demand and a lockout period of 15 min without background infusion. Patients were observed for rest and activity pain VAS, side effect incidence, peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), leg strength, sensory block to cold and pinprick, and PCEA usage into the second postoperative day. Passive and active pain scores for both groups were both satisfactory and comparable for the duration of the study. There were no differences between groups with regard to side effects. There was a 24% increase in total drug used in the high-concentration/low-volume group (P < 0.05). The study demonstrated that PCEA ropivacaine with fentanyl is an effective means of postoperative analgesia for this patient population. Reduced drug consumption with high-volume/low-concentration solution confirms similar findings by other investigators using alternate local anaesthetic agents, and suggests that the therapeutic ratio of ropivacaine is widened if a low-concentration/high-volume solution is used.

Propofol-thiopentone admixture-hypnotic dose, pain on injection and effect on blood pressure.

This study examined some pharmacodynamic characteristics of two admixtures of propofol and thiopentone. Ninety unpremedicated ASA 1 or 2 patients were group-randomized to receive, in a double-blinded manner, one of the following mixtures for induction of anaesthesia: Group P50: propofol 1% 10 ml/thiopentone 2.5% 10 ml; Group P75: propofol 1% 15 ml/thiopentone 2.5% 5 ml; Group P100: propofol 1% 20 ml/lignocaine 1% 4 ml. An additional 30 randomized but unblinded patients from the same patient cohort received thiopentone 2.5% to provide predictive dose data for groups P50 and P75. Haemodynamic data were collected pre- and post-induction. The required induction dose of both mixtures of propofol and thiopentone found an additive rather than a synergistic interaction with no significant difference between predicted and observed dose. Thiopentone resulted in significantly more rapid induction of anaesthesia than propofol/lignocaine or propofol/thiopentone. The addition of thiopentone to propofol was found to be as efficacious as the mixing of lignocaine with propofol in reducing pain on injection. The fall in systolic blood pressure was significantly less in group P50 compared with groups P75 or P100. Admixture of thiopentone with propofol results in an additive hypnotic effect, a reduction in pain of injection (comparable with addition of lignocaine) and a reduced hypotensive response compared to propofol injection alone during induction.

Propofol-thiopentone admixture: recovery characteristics.

We have investigated, in a prospective double-blind study, recovery from anaesthesia induced by two admixtures of propofol and thiopentone and compared it with a third group of patients who received propofol and lignocaine. Ninety unpremedicated ASA 1 or 2 patients scheduled for elective gynaecological laparoscopy as a daycase procedure were randomly allocated to receive one of three different mixtures for induction of anaesthesia as part of a standardized anaesthetic: Group P50: propofol 1% 10 ml/thiopentone 2.5% 10 ml, Group P75: propofol 1% 15 ml/thiopentone 2.5% 5 ml, Group P100: propofol 1% 20 ml/lignocaine 1% 4 ml. Recovery from anaesthesia was assessed for up to four hours post-induction by critical flicker fusion threshold and best post-box toy completion time. Comparison was made with preoperative baseline performance. There was no significant difference in postoperative recovery between the three groups with either assessment but no group returned to their mean preoperative performance levels within the first four hours post-induction. Nor was there any difference between the groups with respect to postoperative analgesia or anti-emetic administration. Utilizing the most sensitive end-point, a sample of nearly 1000 patients in each group would be required to confirm the observed difference with a power of 0.8 based on the data from this study. In comparison with lignocaine, the addition of thiopentone to propofol does not delay recovery from anaesthesia and does not increase postoperative analgesic or anti-emetic requirements.

Starting family life & sex education programs: a health agency's perspective.

PIP: Focus is on the ways school districts can develop sex education programs with minimal funds, utilizing existing teachers and building on existing support among students, parents, faculty and administrators. In 1978, Planned Parenthood, funded by the Department of Health, Education and Welfare, implemented the Family Life Education Program Development Project. This was a statewide research and demonstration project that worked with 13 diverse California school districts to develop programs. Within each district, an administrator and a designated district trainer were initially trained. After community and administrative involvement and support were ensured, teacher training was conducted, and programs were successfully implemented in 12 of 13 selected districts. Preliminary evaluation findings based on observation and interviews with participating district staff identified 4 key factors critical to program success: 1) community involvement and support; 2) administrative involvement and support; 3) effective and acceptable curriculum; and 4) teacher training with impact. These factors are reviewed in detail, and suggestions are presented related to each. In most communities there is existing support for family life and sex education. What is needed is to involve the community in the creation of the local program, for this ensures support. Mechanisms to ensure involvement include advisory and specialized committees, broad community input, and community orientation workshop, school boards, and parent preview sessions. Unless the school administration is solidly behind a program, its chances for successful and continued implementation will remain low.^ieng