Severe verapamil intoxication despite correct use of low-dose verapamil.

We report a case of an adult patient using chronic low-dose verapamil who developed severe verapamil intoxication. A 57-year-old male patient was presented at the emergency room after a collapse of unknown etiology. The airway was compromised, and thus, an endotracheal tube was inserted. The patient deteriorated hemodynamically. Because of verapamil use and bradycardia, verapamil intoxication was suspected. The treatment was supported with intravenous fluids, calcium, inotropes, and a transvenous pacemaker. The patient progressively developed circulatory shock. Verapamil intoxication was confirmed, and therapy was adjusted accordingly. Insulin and calcium infusion were intensified, and glucagon and Intralipid® infusion were initiated. With this therapy, the patient's condition improved rapidly. We found different factors in this patient that could have precipitated this event such as diminished metabolism by cytochrome P450 iso-enzymes, a slightly diminished renal function with hypoalbuminemia, and interaction with other protein-binding drugs.

Glyburide inhibits dipyridamole-induced forearm vasodilation but not adenosine-induced forearm vasodilation.

BACKGROUND: The mechanism of the vasodilator response to adenosine has not been elucidated in humans. Stimulation of adenosine receptors on endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cells with subsequent endothelial release of nitric oxide and opening of adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-sensitive potassium (K(ATP)) channels has been suggested. AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the involvement of K(ATP) channels in the vasodilator response to adenosine and the nucleoside transport inhibitor dipyridamole. Methods and results In healthy male volunteers, adenosine (0.6, 1.9, 5.6, 19, 57, and 190 nmol. min(-1). dL(-1)) was infused into the brachial artery, and forearm blood flow (FBF) was measured by use of strain-gauge plethysmography. Adenosine increased the FBF ratio (FBF in experimental arm/FBF in control arm) from 1.3 +/- 0.2 to 1.2 +/- 0.2, 1.5 +/- 0.2, 2.8 +/- 0.4, 7.3 +/- 2.3, 11.1 +/- 4.1, and 12.9 +/- 3.7 for the six increasing adenosine doses, respectively. Simultaneous infusion of glyburide (INN, glibenclamide), a blocker of K(ATP) channels, did not affect this response (from 1.7 +/- 0.4 to 1.5 +/- 0.2, 2.2 +/- 0.3, 4.0 +/- 1.0, 9.3 +/- 4.0, 13.5 +/- 6.4, and 15.9 +/- 5.3 for the 6 increasing doses of adenosine, respectively; P =.439, n = 6). The increase in FBF ratio during infusion of the nucleoside transport inhibitor dipyridamole (20, 60, and 200 nmol. min(-1). dL(-1)) was significantly reduced by glyburide, as follows: from 1.2 +/- 0.1 to 1.7 +/- 0.2, 2.4 +/- 0.5, and 2.9 +/- 0.4, respectively, during saline solution and from 1.6 +/- 0.2 to 1.8 +/- 0.2, 2.1 +/- 0.3, and 2.2 +/- 0.4, respectively, during glyburide (P =.010 for effect of glyburide on response from baseline, ANOVA for repeated measures; n = 8). The vasodilator response to dipyridamole was significantly inhibited by the adenosine receptor antagonist theophylline. CONCLUSION: Opening of vascular K(ATP) channels is involved in the forearm vasodilator response to dipyridamole but not to adenosine. Differences in stimulated cell type (endothelium for adenosine versus smooth muscle cells for dipyridamole) may underlie this divergent pharmacologic profile.