Effectiveness of Epiduroscopy for Patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Low-back or leg pain in patients suffering from failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is often severe, having a major impact on functionality and quality of life. Despite conservative and surgical treatments, pain can be persistent. An alternative treatment option is epiduroscopy, a minimally invasive procedure based on mechanical adhesiolysis of epidural fibrosis. As epidural fibrosis is speculated to be a major contributor in the pathophysiologic process of FBSS, this review evaluates the effectiveness of epiduroscopy in FBSS patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Critical appraisal was performed using validated tools. Meta-analysis was performed using generic inverse variance analysis. RESULTS: From the 286 identified articles, nine studies were included. The visual analogue scale (VAS) average was 7.6 at baseline, 4.5 at 6, and 4.3 at 12 months. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) average was 61.7% at baseline, 42.8% at 6, and 46.9% at 12 months. An average of 49% of patients experienced significant pain relief at 6 and 37% at 12 months. Meta-analysis showed a pooled VAS mean difference of 3.4 (2.6 to 4.1; 95% confidence interval [CI]) and 2.8 (1.6 to 4.0; 95% CI) and pooled ODI mean difference of 19.4% (12.5 to 26.4%; 95% CI) and 19.8% (13.8 to 25.9%; 95% CI) at 6 and 12 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Current literature demonstrates a clinically relevant reduction in pain and disability scores at 6 to 12 months after mechanical adhesiolysis in FBSS patients. The quality of evidence is moderate, and the level of recommendation is weak. Practitioners should consider the benefits of epiduroscopy after weighing the risks for individual patients with FBSS.

Effect of Fibrinogen Concentrate on Intraoperative Blood Loss Among Patients With Intraoperative Bleeding During High-Risk Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Fibrinogen concentrate might partly restore coagulation defects and reduce intraoperative bleeding. Objective: To determine whether fibrinogen concentrate infusion dosed to achieve a plasma fibrinogen level of 2.5 g/L in high-risk cardiac surgery patients with intraoperative bleeding reduces intraoperative blood loss. Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial conducted in Isala Zwolle, the Netherlands (February 2011-January 2015), involving patients undergoing elective, high-risk cardiac surgery (ie, combined coronary artery bypass graft [CABG] surgery and valve repair or replacement surgery, the replacement of multiple valves, aortic root reconstruction, or reconstruction of the ascending aorta or aortic arch) with intraoperative bleeding (blood volume between 60 and 250 mL suctioned from the thoracic cavity in a period of 5 minutes) were randomized to receive either fibrinogen concentrate or placebo. Interventions: Intravenous, single-dose administration of fibrinogen concentrate (n = 60) or placebo (n = 60), targeted to achieve a postinfusion plasma fibrinogen level of 2.5 g/L. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was blood loss in milliliters between intervention (ie, after removal of cardiopulmonary bypass) and closure of chest. Safety variables (within 30 days) included: in-hospital mortality, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack, renal insufficiency or failure, venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism, and operative complications. Results: Among 120 patients (mean age; 71 [SD, 10] years, 37 women [31%]) included in the study, combined CABG and valve repair or replacement surgery comprised 72% of procedures and had a mean (SD) cardiopulmonary bypass time of 200 minutes (83) minutes. For the primary outcome, median blood loss in the fibrinogen group was 50 mL (interquartile range [IQR], 29-100 mL) compared with 70 mL (IQR, 33-145 mL) in the control group (P = .19), the absolute difference 20 mL (95% CI, -13 to 35 mL). There were 6 cases of stroke or transient ischemic attack (4 in the fibrinogen group); 4 myocardial infarctions (3 in the fibrinogen group); 2 deaths (both in the fibrinogen group); 5 cases with renal insufficiency or failure (3 in the fibrinogen group); and 9 cases with reoperative thoracotomy (4 in the fibrinogen group). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with intraoperative bleeding during high-risk cardiac surgery, administration of fibrinogen concentrate, compared with placebo, resulted in no significant difference in the amount of intraoperative blood loss. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01124981 and EudraCT No: 2009-018086-12.

Effectiveness of a cardiac surgery-specific transfusion protocol.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac surgery is often complicated by excessive bleeding that is commonly treated with blood products. In the year 2009 a transfusion protocol was introduced specifically designed for cardiac surgery procedures. This study aims to evaluate the effect of this protocol on transfusion of blood products and the occurrence of clinical events. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a nonrandomized intervention study. The index group was transfused according to a tailor-made transfusion protocol (operation in 2009/2010) and the control group was transfused according to the Dutch national transfusion guideline (operation in 2007/2008). The primary outcome was mean number of units transfused and proportion of patients transfused. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack, renal injury or failure, rethoracotomy, and prolonged mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: The control group comprised 2685 patients and the index group 2534 patients. The tailor-made transfusion protocol resulted in a decrease of patients transfused with red blood cells (RBCs) and fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) during surgery with odds ratio of 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55-0.86) and 0.63 (95% CI, 0.46-0.86), respectively. Fewer myocardial infarctions were observed in the index group with OR of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.47-0.96). CONCLUSION: The cardiac surgery-specific transfusion protocol resulted in fewer patients transfused with RBCs and FFP and a lower incidence of myocardial infarction. This tailor-made protocol has led to a more judicious use of blood products and is a basis for further refinement of coagulation management during cardiac surgery procedures.

Fibrinogen concentrate therapy in complex cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Fibrinogen concentrate increasingly is used to treat coagulopathic bleeding in cardiac surgery although its effectiveness and safety have not been shown. The authors conducted a cohort study to quantify the effects of fibrinogen concentrate on postoperative blood loss and transfusion and the occurrence of adverse clinical events in complex cardiac surgery patients. DESIGN: A cohort analysis using prospectively collected data. SETTING: A teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand seventy-five patients who underwent complex cardiac surgery in the years 2007 to 2010. INTERVENTION: A nonrandomized intervention with fibrinogen concentrate during complex cardiac surgery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 1,075 patients, 264 (25%) received fibrinogen concentrate during surgery (median dose = 2 g). In the adjusted analysis, the effect of fibrinogen concentrate on blood loss and transfusion in the intensive care unit showed a ratio of geometric means of 1.02 (0.91-1.14) and an odds ratio of 1.14 (0.83-1.56), respectively. For the risk of 30-day mortality, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident/transient ischemic attack, renal insufficiency/failure, total infections, and prolonged mechanical ventilation the adjusted odds ratios were 0.96 (0.48-1.92), 1.10 (0.53-2.27), 1.16 (0.50-2.72), 0.62 (0.29-1.32), 1.18 (0.72-1.95), and 1.44 (0.83-2.49), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Fibrinogen concentrate infusion during surgery did not reduce postoperative blood loss and transfusion, and no increased risk for clinical adverse events was measured. The lower doses and the relatively late intervention with fibrinogen concentrate might have attenuated its hemostatic effect. This study reports the initial clinical use of fibrinogen concentrate in complex cardiac surgery. A randomized clinical trial has been initiated to investigate the hemostatic role of fibrinogen concentrate in cardiac surgery.