Reliability of comorbidity indices as predictive indicators for frequent severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations.

Introduction: The relationship between comorbidities and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is two-sided. As the number of comorbidities increases, frequency of acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) consequently increases. Comorbidity indices can be used to evaluate comorbidities while managing COPD patients. We aimed to compare comorbidity indices such as the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), comorbidities in COPD index (COMCOLD) and COPD specific comorbidity test (COTE) regarding exacerbation frequency. Materials and Methods: Participants hospitalized for AECOPD were included in this bidirectional case-control study. Exacerbation severity, frequency, further exacerbations over a one-year follow-up period and CCI, COMCOLD, and COTE scores were recorded. High and low comorbidity groups were compared regarding AECOPD frequency, severity, and further exacerbations. Result: Ninety-two patients were enrolled. The frequency of AECOPD was significantly higher in high-comorbidity groups (p= 0.026 for CCI; 0.015 for COTE; 0.012 for COMCOLD) than that in low-comorbidity groups. Severe AECOPD was significantly higher in all high-comorbidity groups according to the indices. Median number of exacerbations during the one-year follow-up period was significantly higher in the high-comorbidity groups defined by CCI [0 (0-4) vs. 1 (0-4), p<0.001 and COMCOLD 0 (0-4) vs. 1 (0-3), p= 0.007]. Conclusions: Comorbidities are among the most important risk factors for AECOPD. Managing comorbidities begins with their identification, followed by appropriate interventions. Therefore, using at least one comorbidity index during assessment ensures that comorbidities are not overlooked during diagnostic and therapeutic processes. CCI, COTE, and COMCOLD comorbidity indices can be used in predicting COPD exacerbations.

Prognosis of sarcoidosis and factors affecting prognosis.

INTRODUCTION: Sarcoidosis is a multi-system disease of unknown etiology characterized by non-caseating granulomatous inflammation. Determining the characteristics and prognosis of sarcoidosis cases and revealing the factors that may affect the prognosis are important for approach to patient. This study was planned to obtain prognosis data for our country and to determine the factors affecting the prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 188 patients, followed regularly for three years or more, admitted to Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Chest Diseases between 2012-2017 were evaluated retrospectively. Increased radiological findings, functional impairment and any of the clinical conditions requiring initiation/modification of treatment were accepted as progression. Clinical status of the patients at the last follow-up was defined as remission with treatment, spontaneous remission, stable disease, progression, chronic case and recurrence. Spontaneous remission and remission with treatment, regression, stable disease, and recurrence that followed without treatment and didn't cause symptom or functional impairment were accepted in good prognosis group. Progression, chronic cases that couldn't be followed without treatment and recurrence requiring treatment were included in poor prognosis group. RESULTS: 58% of patients was accepted in good prognosis and 42% had poor prognosis group. During follow-up, spontaneous remission rate was 20.2%, pulmonary hypertension development rate was 10.6% and mortality rate was 4.25%. Low radiological stage, high spirometry and diffusion capacity values, being asymptomatic and having no previous treatment were associated with spontaneous remission and good prognosis. Increase in serum angiotensin converting enzyme and C-reactive protein and decrease in spirometry parameters and diffusion capacity values were associated with progression.