From diagnosis of colorectal cancer to diagnosis of Lynch syndrome: The RM Partners quality improvement project.

AIM: The UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline DG27 recommends universal testing for Lynch syndrome (LS) in all newly diagnosed colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. However, DG27 guideline implementation varies significantly by geography. This quality improvement project (QIP) was developed to measure variation and deliver an effective diagnostic pathway from diagnosis of CRC to diagnosis of LS within the RM Partners (RMP) West London cancer alliance. METHOD: RM Partners includes a population of 4 million people and incorporates nine CRC multidisciplinary teams (MDTs), overseen by a Pathway Group, and three regional genetic services, managing approximately 1500 new CRC cases annually. A responsible LS champion was nominated within each MDT. A regional project manager and nurse practitioner were appointed to support the LS champions, to develop online training packages and patient consultation workshops. MDTs were supported to develop an 'in-house' mainstreaming service to offer genetic testing in their routine oncology clinics. Baseline data were collected through completion of the LS pathway audit of the testing pathway in 30 consecutive CRC patients from each CRC MDT, with measurement of each step of the testing pathway. Areas for improvement in each MDT were identified, delivered by the local champion and supported by the project team. RESULTS: Overall, QIP measurables improved following the intervention. The Wilcoxon signed rank test revealed significant differences with strong effect sizes on the percentile of CRC cases undergoing mismatch repair (MMR) testing in endoscopic biopsies (p = 0.008), further testing with either methylation or BRAF V600E (p = 0/03) and in effective referral for genetic testing (from 10% to 74%; p = 0.02). During the QIP new mainstreaming services were developed, alongside the implementation of systematic and robust testing pathways. These pathways were tailored to the needs of each CRC team to ensure that patients with a diagnosis of CRC had access to testing for LS. Online training packages were produced which remain freely accessible for CRC teams across the UK. CONCLUSION: The LS project was completed by April 2022. We have implemented a systematic approach with workforce transformation to facilitate identification and 'mainstreamed' genetic diagnosis of LS. This work has contributed to the development of a National LS Transformation Project in England which recommends local leadership within cancer teams to ensure delivery of diagnosis of LS and integration of genomics into clinical practice.

Advances in breast reconstruction after mastectomy.

Over the past 40 years, surgical reconstruction of the breast following mastectomy has become an important aspect of the cancer patient's rehabilitation process. While the surgical emphasis remains on a cure for the cancer, experience with breast reconstruction has not demonstrated any increased rate of cancer recurrence, even when reconstruction is performed immediately following tumor resection. Advances in surgical technique and biotechnology have made post-mastectomy reconstruction possible. The development of silicone gel and saline-filled implants as well as tissue expanders has revolutionized breast reconstruction. The elucidation of musculocutaneous flaps now provides the surgeon with the ability to transfer adequate quantities of vascularized tissue to reconstruct the surgical defects. The advent of microsurgical techniques has provided an additional reconstructive option, with free tissue transfer allowing the plastic surgeon to move musculocutaneous flaps from remote or distant sites to reconstruct the defect. The option of having the reconstruction immediately following the mastectomy procedure is now available to the patient. When reviewing the anatomy of the breast region, the surgeon must consider the mammary gland, its vascular supply, and its lymphatic system. The surgical techniques involved in reconstruction after mastectomy include the use of breast implants and tissue expansion, as well as reconstruction with autogenous tissues. Reconstruction with autogenous tissues includes the use of latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap, transverse rectus abdominus musculocutaneous flap, free flap transfer, as well as nipple-areola reconstruction. Breast reconstruction after mastectomy should be undertaken by a plastic and reconstructive surgeon with considerable training and experience with these diversified procedures.

Lidocaine metabolism pathophysiology, drug interactions, and surgical implications.

A thorough understanding of the pathophysiology of lidocaine metabolism is an important prerequisite to minimizing the risk of morbidity and mortality associated with lipoplasty. Although the tumescent technique has greatly improved the safety of large-volume lipoplasty through decreased blood loss and reduced anesthetic needs, it has introduced the possibility for lidocaine toxicity. Because lidocaine is metabolized by the cytochrome P450 system, the potential for drug interactions is heightened. These drug interactions are implicated as a cause of lidocaine toxicity. A comprehensive review of the patient's preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative medication profile is critical to perioperative patient safety.