Efficacy of the Home-Based Mental Health Evaluation (HOME) Program for Engaging Patients in Care After Hospitalization.

OBJECTIVE: The risk of suicide is elevated in the days and weeks after discharge from a psychiatric hospitalization, and lack of treatment engagement posthospitalization is also associated with suicide. The authors sought to determine whether the Home-Based Mental Health Evaluation [HOME] Program is efficacious in helping patients engage in care after psychiatric hospitalization. METHODS: This study was a nonrandomized, controlled, two-arm (HOME Program versus enhanced care as usual [E-CARE]) trial that took place at four Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers. Participants (N=302) were patients admitted to a psychiatric inpatient unit. The HOME Program consists of phone- and home-based contacts that include suicide risk assessment, safety planning, and problem-solving around barriers to care. The primary outcome was treatment engagement, as documented in the electronic medical record. RESULTS: Veterans in the HOME Program group were 1.33 (95% confidence interval [CI]=1.29-1.37) times more likely to engage in treatment, compared with veterans in the E-CARE group (p<0.001). HOME Program participants were estimated to have attended 55% more individual appointments (95% CI=12%-113%, p=0.02), compared with those in the E-CARE group. The adjusted difference in median time to treatment engagement was 15 days (95% CI=3.5-27.0) such that HOME Program participants engaged in treatment more quickly than participants at the E-CARE sites. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that participation in the HOME Program can help individuals at high risk of suicide engage in care after psychiatric hospitalization.

Predictive Validity of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale among a Cohort of At-risk Veterans.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the psychometric properties of the Columbia- Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) among a cohort of veterans identified to be at risk for suicide. METHOD: Convergent, divergent, and predictive validity of the C-SSRS were examined using secondary data from a study of veterans who presented to the psychiatric emergency room (n = 237). Data were collected 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months following emergency room discharge. RESULTS: Results demonstrated good evidence for convergent and divergent validity. Baseline intensity subscale scores predicted actual and interrupted attempts, and any behavior for all available data and for the subsample who had 6-month follow-up data, and also predicted preparatory behavior in the full sample. Baseline severity subscale scores predicted preparatory behavior and any behavior for the full sample and for those with 6 months of follow-up, and actual attempts for the full sample. Severity of ideation cutoff scores was significantly associated with actual attempts and any behavior in both samples. Adding a prior behavior criterion demonstrated similar results. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that the C-SSRS is a psychometrically sound measure that can be used to augment suicide risk assessment with veterans who are already identified to be at risk for suicide.

A menu of options: Resources for preventing veteran suicide in rural communities.

Suicide rates are higher in rural communities than in their urban counterparts. Of particular concern are veterans residing in rural communities, who have a 20% higher risk of dying by suicide than veterans who live in urban areas. The objective of this manuscript is to assess the availability of evidence-based and promising practices to support a community-based suicide prevention effort for rural veterans. We compiled a compendium of evidence-based and promising practices-the "menu of options"-with resources across 4 levels: increasing access to crisis services, enhancing primary care suicide prevention, training community members, and raising public awareness. We compiled resources from multiple sources, then reviewed and rated each one to arrive at consensus on the final selections. The final menu includes 70 resources. However, only 20 are tailored for veterans, only one for rural communities, and none for rural veterans. More research is needed to identify effective strategies and develop rural-tailored resources for preventing suicide among this unique and often underserved population. The menu of options represents a first step toward developing an approach to rural veteran-suicide prevention that aligns with evidence-based practice, theory, and a public health model for suicide prevention. (PsycINFO Database Record

Connecting Veterans at Risk for Suicide to Care Through the HOME Program.

The Home-Based Mental Health Evaluation (HOME) program, which engages veterans in care following psychiatric hospitalization, was evaluated. Thirty-four veterans who participated in the HOME program were compared to 34 veterans from a matched archival control group on treatment engagement and implementation outcomes. Veterans who participated in the HOME program were significantly more likely to engage in care, engaged in care more quickly, and attended significantly more individual mental health appointments. Veterans reported high levels of satisfaction. Results suggest that the HOME program is effective at engaging veterans in care during the high-risk period of time following psychiatric hospitalization.

Balancing patient care and confidentiality: considerations in obtaining collateral information.

Collateral information facilitates comprehensive mental health care and is consistent with recovery-oriented models of care. But providers are often faced with complex decisions about obtaining collateral information, particularly when patients do not consent to communication with third parties for information gathering. Such situations require a thoughtful balance of best clinical practices, legal and ethical responsibilities, and patient safety concerns. This column offers an overview of the clinical utility of collateral information as well as the ethical and legal regulations concerning confidentiality that guide the process of obtaining collateral information. The risk-benefit analysis process related to obtaining collateral information without patient permission is illustrated. Recommendations about clinical consultation and documentation that facilitate optimal and ethical patient care are offered.