Antimicrobial activity of ceftazidime-avibactam and comparators against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales collected in Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Latvia and Lithuania: ATLAS Surveillance Program, 2019.

Antimicrobial susceptibility of clinical isolates collected from sites in central Europe in 2019 was tested by CLSI broth microdilution method and EUCAST breakpoints. Most active were amikacin, ceftazidime-avibactam and colistin; respectively, susceptibility rates among P. aeruginosa (n = 701) were 89.2%, 92.2% and 99.9%; difficult-to-treat (DTR) isolates, 62.5%, 37.5% and 100%; multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates, 68.3%, 72.9% and 99.5%; meropenem-resistant (MEM-R), metallo-ß-lactamase-negative (MBL-negative) isolates, 72.8%, 78.6% and 100%. Among Enterobacterales (n = 1639), susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam, colistin and tigecycline was ≥ 97.9%; MDR Enterobacterales, 96.8%, 94.4% and 100%, respectively; DTR isolates, ≥ 76.2% to ceftazidime-avibactam and colistin; MEM-R, MBL-negative isolates, ≥ 90.0% to ceftazidime-avibactam and colistin.

Immunohistochemical expression and colocalization of somatostatin, carboxypeptidase-E and prohormone convertases 1 and 2 in rat brain.

The processing of many peptides for their maturation in target tissue depends upon the presence of sorting receptor. Several previous studies have predicted that carboxypeptidase-E (CPE), prohormone convertase 1 (PC1) and prohormone convertase 2 (PC2) may function as sorting elements for somatostatin (SST) for its maturation and processing to appropriate targets. However, nothing is currently known about whether brain, neuronal culture or even endocrine cells express SST, CPE, PC1 and PC2 and exhibit colocalization. Accordingly, in the present study using peroxidase immunohistochemistry, double-labeled indirect immunofluorescence immunohistochemistry and Western blot analysis, we mapped the distributional pattern of SST, CPE, PC1 and PC2 in different rat brain regions. Additionally, we also determined the colocalization of SST with CPE, PC1 and PC2 as well as colocalization of CPE with PC1 and PC2. The localization of SST, CPE, PC1 and PC2 reveals a distinct and region specific distribution pattern in the rat brain. Using an indirect double-label immunofluorescence method we observed selective neuron specific colocalization in a region specific manner in cortex, striatum and hippocampus. These studies provide the first evidence for colocalization between SST, CPE, PC1 and PC2 as well as CPE with PC1 and PC2. SST in cerebral cortex colocalized in pyramidal and non-pyramidal neurons with CPE, PC1 and PC2. Most importantly, in striatum and hippocampus colocalization was mostly observed selectively and preferentially in interneurons. CPE is also colocalized with PC1 and PC2 in a region specific manner. The data presented here provide a new insight into the distribution and colocalization of SST, CPE, PC1 and PC2 in rat brain. Taken together, our data anticipate the possibility that CPE, PC1 and PC2 might be potential target for the maturation of SST.

DNA hybridization at microbeads with cathodic stripping voltammetric detection.

In electrochemical DNA hybridization sensors generally a single-stranded probe DNA was immobilized at the electrode followed by hybridization with the target DNA and electrochemical detection of the hybridization event at the same electrode. In this type of experiments nonspecific adsorption of DNA at the electrode caused serious difficulties especially in the case of the analysis of long target DNAs. We propose a new technology in which DNA is hybridized at a surface H and the hybridization is detected at the detection electrode (DE). This technology significantly extends the choice of hybridization surfaces and DEs. Here we use paramagnetic Dynabeads Oligo(dT)(25) (DBT) as a transportable reactive surface H and a hanging mercury drop electrode as DE. We describe a label-free detection of DNA and RNA (selectively captured at DBT) based on the determination of adenines (at ppb levels, by cathodic stripping voltammetry) released from the nucleic acids by acid treatment. The DNA and RNA nonspecific adsorption at DBT is negligible, making thus possible to detect the hybridization event with a great specificity and sensitivity. Specific detection of the hybridization of polyribonucleotides, mRNA, oligodeoxynucleotides, and a DNA PCR product (226 base pairs) is demonstrated. New possibilities in the development of the DNA hybridization sensors opened by the proposed technology, including utilization of catalytic signals in nucleic acid determination at mercury (e.g. signals of osmium complexes covalently bound to DNA) and solid DEs (e.g. using enzyme-labeled antibodies against chemically modified DNAs) are discussed.

Binding of p53 and its core domain to supercoiled DNA.

We have compared the binding of human full-length p53 protein (p53; expressed in bacteria and insects) and its isolated core domain (p53CD, amino acids 94-312; expressed in bacteria) to negatively supercoiled (sc) DNA using gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting. Significant differences were observed; p53CD produced a relatively small and continuous retardation of scDNA, in contrast to the ladder of distinct bands formed by p53 in agarose gels. The ladder produced by full-length protein expressed in bacteria (p53b) was similar to that observed earlier with protein expressed in insect cells (p53i). Competition between scDNAs and their linearized (lin) forms showed a preference for scDNAs by both p53 and p53CD, but the ratios characterizing the distribution of the protein between sc and lin pBluescript DNAs were substantially higher for p53 (sc/lin > 60 in p53b) than for p53CD (sc/lin approximately 4). Strong binding of p53 to scDNA lacking the p53 consensus sequence may represent a new p53-binding mode, which we tentatively denote supercoil-selective (SCS) binding. This binding requires both the C-terminal domain and the core domain. Targets of this binding may include: (a) DNA segments defined both by the nucleotide sequence and local topology, and/or (b) strand crossings and/or bending. The binding preference of p53CD for scDNA may be due to the known nonspecific binding to internal single-stranded regions in scDNA (absent in relaxed DNA molecules) and/or to SCS binding albeit with reduced affinity due to the absence of contributions from other p53 domains.