Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cureus ; 15(8): e43809, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37731419

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hardware removal surgeries are considerably common. However, the justifications for these surgeries are debatable. The indications may vary from pain, surgical site infection, or failure of osteosynthesis. Additionally, the surgery can be performed without medical indication. Following these surgeries, many complications can occur. Therefore, surgeons and patients should be aware of the appropriate indications and have realistic expectations of the risks and benefits of implant removal. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review study. We included all patients aged 17-86 years who underwent hardware removal surgery in the orthopedic surgery department of King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from 2010 to 2019. All relevant data, such as demographic characteristics, location and type of hardware, indication for hardware removal, duration between insertion and removal, and complications after removal were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 244 medical records were reviewed with a mean patient age of 34 years. Out of the total, 190 patients (77.9%) were male. The femur was the most common location of hardware removal, in 50 cases (20.58%). Plates and screws were the most common type of implants (40.2%). Most patients underwent hardware implantation because of fractures (89.3%). In total, 119 patients (48.8%) had the hardware removed electively. Only 29 patients (12%) reported postoperative complications; 190 patients (77.9%) were advised by their surgeon against hardware removal. CONCLUSION: Hardware removal procedures are commonly performed worldwide for various reasons, including infection, pain, and loosening. In this study, we have outlined the reasons for implant removal, the locations, complications, and the rationale behind this surgery. We have provided a new decision-making assessment, aimed at the general population and surgeons alike, that will help patients better comprehend the complications and risks associated with this elective surgery.

2.
Cureus ; 15(4): e37385, 2023 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37181996

RESUMO

Background Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a complex disorder. Genetics and environment might be attributed as the leading cause of NF1, which is characterized by multisystemic involvement. We aim to elaborate on Saudi children's NF1 phenotypes and genotypes. Methods This study was conducted in the Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs (MNGHA), Saudi Arabia including three tertiary hospitals, using a retrospective cohort method. Electronic charts were reviewed to extract the variables. All Saudi pediatric patients aged less than 18 with NF1 were included. Consecutive sampling was used due to the limited number of patients. Results The study included 160 patients (81 males) with an average age of 8.08 years. Also, 33 (20.6%) patients had cutaneous neurofibroma while 31 (19.4%) patients had plexiform neurofibromas. Iris lisch nodules were seen in 33.75%. Optic pathway glioma was seen in 29 (18%) cases while non-optic pathway glioma was seen in 27 (17%) cases. Skeletal abnormalities were seen in 27 (17%) of cases. A first-degree relative with NF1 was seen in 83 (52%) of cases. Epilepsy was the presenting feature of 27 (17%) cases. Cognitive impairment was found in 15 (9.4%) patients. Genetic mutation was seen in 82/100 cases, the rest were negative. The types of mutations were as follows: nonsense 30 (36.6%); missense 20 (24.4%); splicing site mutation 12 (14.6%); frameshift 10 (12.2%); microdeletion 7 (8.5%); and whole gene deletion 3 (3.75%) patients. No phenotype-genotype correlation was seen. Conclusion In this cohort of Saudi pediatric patients with NF1, optic pathway glioma and other brain tumors were prevalent. The most common mutation is the nonsense mutation.

3.
Cureus ; 15(4): e37426, 2023 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37182036

RESUMO

Background The orthopedic surgery workforce constitutes a vital role in the healthcare system, with data being scarce. Therefore, through this study, we share an overview of the orthopedic workforce distribution, demographic trends, and changes over the past decade in Saudi Arabia. Methods All practicing orthopedic surgeons in Saudi Arabia from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2021, were included in the study. Data regarding orthopedic surgeons' demographics and numbers were obtained from the Saudi Commission for Health Specialties (SCFHS), whereas the data related to the geographical distribution of orthopedic surgeons was obtained from the Ministry of Health Statistical Yearbook of 2020. Results The ratio of orthopedic surgeons per 100,000 people was 5.42 in 2010, which grew subsequently to 12.29 in 2021. The number of Saudi orthopedic surgeons has been noticeably rising through the years, while a slowly growing pattern can be seen among non-Saudi orthopedic surgeons. In addition, the highest ratios of orthopedic surgeons per 100,000 were in Makkah (1.72), Riyadh (1.26), and the Eastern Region (1.06). Conclusion In this study, we demonstrate the progress of the orthopedic workforce in Saudi Arabia over a period of 12 years. The number of orthopedic surgeons per 100,000 people showed a significant rise due to several factors, one of which is road traffic accidents. Also, although the number of female orthopedic surgeons has been rising lately, they are still much fewer than males in this field. In addition, Saudi Arabia has been developing a new healthcare system via the privatization of some of the governmental hospitals, which will lead to changes in the future workforce and its accommodations.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...