Efficacy and Safety of a Hyaluronic Acid-Containing Gauze Pad in the Treatment of Chronic Venous or Mixed-Origin Leg Ulcers: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Hyaluronic acid (HA)-containing formulations routinely are utilized along with standard therapy to promote faster healing of chronic wounds; evidence to guide clinical decisions on the use of topical HA in the healing of vascular leg ulcers is limited. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the efficacy and safety of an HA-impregnated gauze pad with an identical gauze pad without HA in the treatment of chronic leg ulcers of vascular origin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, multinational, parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, clinical study was conducted between June 13, 2017, and December 31, 2018. Adults with 1 or more chronic leg ulcers of venous or mixed origin between 2 months and 4 years' duration were eligible to participate. Participants were randomized to treatment consisting of standard care (ie, ulcer cleansing, debridement/anesthesia as necessary, and optimized compression) and either application of a gauze pad containing 0.05% HA or a neutral comparator once daily for a maximum of 20 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was complete ulcer healing (100% reepithelialization of the wound area centrally assessed by 1 independent and experienced assessor blinded with respect to the treatment applied, as shown on digital photographs taken under standardized conditions at or before 20 weeks and confirmed 3 weeks later). Secondary efficacy endpoints included the percentage of completely healed target ulcers, residual area of target ulcer relative to baseline, the condition of the periulcerous skin, the total amount of analgesics used, the incidence of infection at the ulcer site of the target ulcer, patient adherence to treatment, time to achieve complete healing as centrally assessed, and pain intensity as measured by a visual analog scale. RESULTS: Among the 168 participants (82 in the HA gauze pad group and 86 in the neutral gauze pad group), 33 (39.8%) in the HA group experienced complete healing of the target ulcer, which was significantly higher than the neutral comparator group (15, 18.5%; P = .002). Results in the full analysis and per-protocol sets were consistent with the primary results; no significant difference was noted in outcomes when participants' wounds were stratified according to baseline ulcer size. CONCLUSIONS: HA delivered in a gauze pad formulation could be a beneficial treatment for chronic leg ulcers of venous or mixed origin.

Efficacy and Safety of a Hyaluronic Acid-Containing Cream in the Treatment of Chronic, Venous, or Mixed-Origin Leg Ulcers: A Prospective, Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Topical applications of hyaluronic acid (HA)-containing formulations, based on the complex and vital role of HA in all stages of the wound-healing process, are routinely used with standard therapy to promote faster healing of chronic wounds. However, evidence to guide clinical decisions on the use of topical HA in the healing of vascular leg ulcers is limited. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the efficacy and safety of topical application of a hyaluronic acid cream vs a neutral comparator (identical cream without HA) in treating subjects with chronic leg ulcers of vascular origin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter double-blind randomized controlled trial. One hundred sixty-eight subjects with chronic leg ulcers of venous or mixed (venous and arterial) origin were randomized to receive either topical applications of 0.2% HA cream or neutral comparator cream for a maximum of 20 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was complete ulcer healing (100% reepithelialization of the wound area centrally assessed at 20 weeks or before and confirmed 3 weeks later). In both groups, topical treatment was associated with standard therapy (ulcer cleansing and optimized compression). RESULTS: The proportion of subjects with centrally assessed complete healing of the target ulcer that was confirmed 3 weeks later (primary efficacy endpoint) was substantially higher in the HA cream group (31.3%) than in the neutral cream group (14.8%; P =.009). Results in the full analysis, per protocol, and as assessed by the investigator were consistent with primary results. No significant difference in treatment effect was observed when subjects were stratified according to baseline ulcer size (≤20 cm2 or >20 cm2) regardless of topical treatment. Safety and tolerability were comparable between treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of subjects with chronic leg ulcers of venous or mixed origin with HA cream is safe, well tolerated, and results in a higher rate of healing than a neutral comparator cream.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone in Healthy Women Receiving Single and Multiple Doses of Highly Purified Human Menotrophin and Urofollitrophin.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Highly purified human menotrophin and urofollitrophin preparations obtained from human urine via a novel patented purification method have been tested over a timeframe of 14 years in the studies presented in this article. The objective of the studies was to investigate the pharmacokinetics and the pharmacodynamics of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) after single subcutaneous and intramuscular doses and multiple subcutaneous doses of the tested preparations in healthy fertile pituitary-suppressed women. DESIGNS: We performed five open, randomised, crossover, single-dose bioequivalence and/or bioavailability studies and one open, multiple-dose, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics study. STUDY SUBJECTS AND TREATMENTS: The six studies included 121 healthy fertile women taking their usual combined oral contraceptives for 3 months before the study: Study 1: 300 international units (IU) of highly purified menotrophin as single subcutaneous and intramuscular doses. Study 2: 300 IU of highly purified menotrophin (test formulation vs. comparator) as single subcutaneous doses. Study 3: 300 IU of highly purified urofollitrophin (hp-FSH) (test formulation vs. comparator) as single subcutaneous doses. Study 4: 300 IU (2 × 150 IU vs. 4 × 75 IU) of hp-FSH as single subcutaneous doses. Study 5: 225 and 445 IU of hp-FSH as single subcutaneous doses. Study 6: daily 225 IU of hp-FSH as subcutaneous doses for 5 consecutive days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures were the FSH pharmacokinetic parameters, estradiol concentrations, and the number and size of the follicles. RESULTS: FSH after single subcutaneous and intramuscular injections of menotrophin or urofollitrophin attained a systemic peak (maximum) concentration (C max) that was on average consistent throughout the first four studies and ranged from 4.98 to 7.50 IU/L. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from administration to the last observed concentration time t (AUCt) ranged from 409.71 to 486.16 IU/L·h and the elimination half-life (t ½) ranged from 39.02 to 53.63 h. After multiple doses of urofollitrophin (225 IU) for 5 days, FSH attained a mean C max of 14.93 ± 2.92 IU/L and had an AUC during the time interval τ between two consecutive doses at steady state (AUCτ) of 322.59 ± 57.92 IU/L·h, which was similar to the mean AUCt after a single subcutaneous dose of 225 IU of urofollitrophin in study 5 (306.82 ± 68.37 IU/L·h). CONCLUSIONS: In our studies, the intramuscular and subcutaneous routes of menotrophin were equivalent; both menotrophin and urofollitrophin were bioequivalent to their marketed reference; FSH kinetic parameters following injection of urofollitrophin were dose proportional and independent from the administered concentration; and multiple doses of FSH increased estradiol levels and enhanced growth of follicles with a good dose-response correlation. Local tolerability was excellent throughout the six studies.

A randomized trial comparing the endometrial effects of daily subcutaneous administration of 25 mg and 50 mg progesterone in aqueous preparation.

OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy of a new P preparation in aqueous solution for subcutaneous injection for inducing the predecidual transformation of the endometrium. DESIGN: Prospective, single-blinded, randomized, parallel pilot trial. SETTING: University-affiliated clinical research center. PATIENT(S): Twenty-five regularly cycling female volunteers. INTERVENTION(S): Volunteers, aged 18-45 years, body mass index 19-25 kg/m(2), whose ovaries were suppressed with a GnRH agonist were estrogenized for 14 or 21 days with the use of transdermal systems delivering 0.1 mg/d E2. After confirming that the endometrial thickness was >7 mm, the women were randomized to 25 mg or 50 mg of subcutaneous P injections daily for 11 days, after which the endometrium was sampled with the use of a Pipelle device. The endometrial biopsies were evaluated by two independent pathologists. Adverse events and subjective tolerance were checked every day by the study investigator. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Predecidual changes in endometrial biopsies obtained after 11 days of subcutaneous administration of P. RESULT(S): Of 24 biopsies performed (one dropout), 22 provided tissue for histologic analysis. Evidence of predecidual changes in the endometrial stroma was found in 100% of the cases, with no differences between the two studied doses. CONCLUSION(S): Both doses of the new aqueous P preparation available for subcutaneous administration demonstrated predecidual changes in 100% of the interpretable endometrial biopsies in total absence of endogenous P. This offers good prospect of efficacy in luteal phase support for the lowest dose tested, 25 mg/d, the physiologic amount produced daily by the ovary during the midluteal phase. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00377923.

Efficacy and safety of nimodipine in subcortical vascular dementia: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Evidence of drug efficacy in vascular dementia (VaD) is scanty. Therapeutic trials should address VaD subtypes. We studied the efficacy and safety of the calcium antagonist nimodipine in subcortical VaD. METHODS: 242 patients defined as affected by subcortical VaD based on clinical (ICD-10) and computed tomography criteria were randomized to oral nimodipine 90 mg/d or placebo. RESULTS: 230 patients (121 nimodipine, mean age 75.2+/-6.1; 109 placebo, 75.4+/-6.0) were valid for the intention-to-treat analysis. At 52 weeks, the Sandoz Clinical Assessment Geriatric scale 5-point variation (primary outcome measure) did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. However, patients on nimodipine performed better than placebo patients in lexical production (P<0.01) and less frequently showed deterioration (3 or more point-drop versus baseline) on a Mini-Mental State Examination (28.1% versus 50.5%; chi2 P<0.01) and Global Deterioration Scale (P<0.05). Dropouts and adverse events were all significantly more common among placebo than nimodipine patients, particularly cardiovascular (30 versus 13; RR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.11 to 4.60) and cerebrovascular events (28 versus 10; RR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.23 to 4.98), and behavioral disturbances requiring intervention (22 versus 5; RR, 3.88; 95% CI, 1.49 to 10.12). A worst-rank analysis, performed to correct for the effect of the high dropout rate in the placebo group, showed additional significant differences in favor of nimodipine in Set Test and MMSE total scores. CONCLUSIONS: Nimodipine may be of some benefit in subcortical VaD. Confirming previous results, the safety analysis of this study shows that in this high-risk population, nimodipine might protect against cardiovascular comorbidities.