Thera-prov: a pilot study of improv used to treat anxiety and depression.

Background: Improvisational theater exercises (improv) are used in various settings to improve mental health and medical outcomes. However, there is little documented evidence of the effectiveness of these interventions.Aims: We developed a short-term, group intervention that used improv exercises in a therapeutic manner to treat psychiatric patients.Methods: We evaluated the feasibility, acceptability and five clinical outcomes (depressive symptoms, anxious symptoms, self-esteem, perfectionism and satisfaction with social roles) of this intervention in an outpatient setting. Participants were 32 patients with symptoms of anxiety and depression and who had variable exposure to psychiatric treatment.Results: In paired samples t-tests, participants demonstrated reduced symptoms of anxiety (t(31) = 4.67, p < 0.001) and depression (t(31) = 3.78, p = 0.001), and improved self-esteem (t(31)= -3.31, p = 0.002) following the intervention. There was a trend towards reduction of perfectionism (t(31) = 1.77, p = 0.087), but no substantial change in rated satisfaction with social roles. Effect sizes were medium for reduction in symptoms of depression and anxiety.Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that a brief intervention based on improv exercises may provide a strong and efficient treatment for patients with anxiety and depression.

Changing public stigma with continuum beliefs.

BACKGROUND: Given the egregious effect of public stigma on the lives of people with mental illness, researchers have sought to unpack and identify effective components of anti-stigma programs. AIM: We expect to show that continuum messages have more positive effect on stigma and affirming attitudes (beliefs that people with mental illness recover and should be personally empowered) than categorical perspectives. The effect of continuum beliefs will interact with contact strategies. METHOD: A total of 598 research participants were randomly assigned to online presentations representing one of the six conditions: three messages (continuum, categorical, or neutral control) by two processes (education or contact). Participants completed measures of continuum beliefs (as a manipulation check), stigma and affirming attitudes after viewing the condition. RESULTS: Continuum messages had significantly better effect on views that people with mental illness are "different," a finding that interacted with contact. Continuum messages also had better effects on recovery beliefs, once again an effect that interacted significantly with contact. CONCLUSIONS: Implications of these findings for improving anti-stigma programs are discussed.

Stigma by Any Other Name.

OBJECTIVE: Some advocates argue that the word "stigma" is itself stigmatizing and contributes to further denigration of people with mental illness. This brief report presents results of a nationwide survey comparing terminology related to stigma in regard to mental illness. METHODS: A total of 340 Amazon Mechanical Turk survey takers read variations of a vignette depicting an individual with schizophrenia and then completed a brief stigma measure. The vignette varied in a single sentence in which three different words-"stigma," "prejudice," and "reactions"-were used to describe coworkers' possible attitudes toward the depicted individual. RESULTS: Stigma ratings did not differ by vignette group. "Reactions" was viewed as significantly less disrespectful than both "stigma" and "prejudice" (p<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Further research is needed to support replacing the word "stigma" in public arenas. Current efforts to remove the word may unnecessarily distract advocates and policy makers from the primary mission of erasing stigma.

What is the impact of self-stigma? Loss of self-respect and the "why try" effect.

BACKGROUND: The "Why Try" phenomenon, a consequence of self-stigma, is a sense of futility that occurs when people believe they are unworthy or incapable of achieving personal goals because they apply the stereotypes of mental illness to themselves. AIMS: This study examines a four-stage model of self-stigma (aware, agree, apply, and self-stigma harm) and examines the "why try" effect as a result. We do that by testing a measure of "why try." METHOD: Two hypothetical path models were tested. In the first, applying stereotypes to oneself leads to diminished self-respect and a sense of "why try". In the second, the effect of applying stereotypes on "why try" is mediated by diminished self-respect. Participants completed the "why try" measure along with measures of self-stigma, public stigma, recovery, and empowerment. RESULTS: Results show application of stereotypes to oneself predicts diminished self-respect and "why try". "Why try" was significantly associated with agreement with public stigma, depression, and diminished sense of personal recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study reveal the complex impact of self-stigma demonstrating its emotional and behavioral consequences. Implications for impacting self-stigma are discussed.

The public stigma of mental illness means a difference between you and me.

Social desirability can influence reports of stigma change in that subscribing to stigmatizing attitudes might pose a threat to personal beliefs of open-mindedness, while endorsing difference might not be as troubling. A measure is needed that assesses stigma change but is less susceptible to desirability effects. This study examined the psychometrics of various assessments of perceived difference from a person with mental illness. A total of 460 participants were recruited online using Amazon's Mechanical Turk. Four measures of difference, the Likert Scale of Difference, Semantic Differential: Similar-Different Scale, Semantic Differential: Mental Illness versus Other Illness scale, and Cause of Perceived Difference Scale were compared to measures of stereotypes, affirming attitudes, and care seeking. A vignette describing a person with mental illness anchored the Difference Scale and a measure of stereotype. Results showed that measures of difference yielded significantly higher endorsements than measures of stereotypes; the Semantic Differential Scale: Similar-Different was endorsed at a higher rate than other difference scales. Difference scores were positively related to stereotypes and inversely related to affirming attitudes. Difference was also found to influence empowerment separate from, and in addition to stereotype. These results suggest a new domain as an efficient and sensitive measure of stigma change.