RESUMO
Objectives To identify how readily accessible dental care is to a sample of pregnant women in King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), Jeddah, and to determine any potential obstacles to receiving dental care while pregnant. Methodology Female patients visiting antenatal clinics in KAMC in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia were the target group for this cross-sectional study. The age range was limited to childbearing age (18-48 years old). Both pregnant and non-pregnant women were established in obstetrics and gynecology clinics. The pattern of dental service use and attitude toward dental treatment during pregnancy were assessed using a self-administered questionnaire. Other data were gathered, such as demographics, education, employment status, and the number of live births. Results This study included 361 participants in the survey with an 80% response rate. A large proportion of participants was in the age group of 19 to 35 years old (75.07%; p-value < 0.0001), holding undergraduate degrees (58.17%; p-value < 0.0001), housewives (77.56%; p-value < 0.0001), married (99.45%; p-value < 0.0001), non-pregnant women (75.07%; p-value < 0.0001), and have three or more children (42.94%; p-value < 0.0001). About two-thirds of the participants reported using private hospitals for their dental services (65.37%; p-value < 0.0001), while 22.03% (p-value < 0.0001) of the participants reported visiting a dentist in the last six months and 7.2% (p-value < 0.0001) visited a dentist during pregnancy. In terms of awareness questions, 72.02% (p-value < 0.0001) reported that if the mother did not eat well, the baby takes calcium from the mother's teeth, 43.77% (p-value < 0.0001) reported brushing teeth at least three times a day, and 42.94% (p-value < 0.0001) of women reported that they do not have an idea about what they need to do if a pregnant woman needs treatment that requires taking X-rays. Similar patterns were observed in other awareness answers. Conclusion Based on the study's findings, there is a significantly low rate of dental care utilization in the sample of pregnant women. We conclude that educated women are more likely to maintain good oral hygiene and are more satisfied with their oral health. However, a large proportion of participants reported dental problems during their pregnancy. In general, a lack of knowledge about the safety of dental care during pregnancy is the main obstacle to seeking dental care. Limitations The selected sample was from antenatal clinics in KAMC & Primary Healthcare, National Guard, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. As a result, the findings of this study cannot be applied to the total female population of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Because the information was self-reported, which is a common issue with self-administered questionnaires, and because participation in the study was voluntary and participant confidentiality was maintained, there is a low chance that the data may be subject to recall or response bias.
RESUMO
Purpose This study aims to examine specific aspects of socket morphology, including buccal and palatal/lingual bone width, interradicular bone (IRB) width, and assessments of root apices and furcation proximity to the vital structures of the maxillary and mandibular first and second molars using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and methods The study involved the analysis of 400 maxillary and mandibular first and second molars. Various measurements were taken to assess socket morphology, including mesiodistal (MD) and buccolingual (BL) width, buccal and lingual bone thickness at 2 mm apical to the alveolar crest, IRB width at 2 mm from the furcation, and the distance between the root apices and furcation to vital structures, such as the floor of the maxillary sinus (FMS) and inferior alveolar nerve (IAN). Results The mesiobuccal (MB) root of the second molar commonly intruded into the sinus, followed by the palatal root of the maxillary first molar. The mean FMS-F distance was 7.17 + 3.98 mm, and it was 7.2 + 2.72 mm for maxillary first and second molars, respectively. The mean IRB width was 2.77 + 0.96 and 2.29 + 0.74 mm for the first and second molars. The mandibular second molar had the shortest distance to the IAN in comparison to the first molar. For maxillary teeth, 7% of the first and 4% of the second molars presented alveolar anatomy adequate for immediate implant placement, compared to 84% and 50% of mandibular first and second molars. Conclusion Understanding the local alveolar bone anatomy of molars and its relationship to vital structures is crucial for the effective planning of implant treatments.
