Four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) for preoperative parathyroid localization: A good study but are we using it?

BACKGROUND: Four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) scan to localize abnormal parathyroid glands is diagnostically superior to ultrasound (US) and sestamibi. The implementation of 4D-CT imaging is unknown. METHODS: The Collaborative Endocrine Surgery Quality Improvement Program (CESQIP) database from 2014 to 2018 was utilized. Patients with hyperparathyroidism undergoing an initial operation were included. The rate of US, sestamibi and 4D-CT performance was calculated for the entire study population, and for each institution. RESULTS: 7,959 patients were included. In 311(3.9%) patients, no preoperative imaging was recorded. Of patients with imaging, US was performed in 6,872(86.3%), sestamibi in 5,094(64.0%), and 4D-CT in 1,630(20.4%). The combination of US and sestamibi was most frequent (3,855, 48.4%). Institutional rates of 4D-CT performance varied from 0.1% to 88.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Of the imaging modalities, 4D-CT was utilized least frequently and with greatest variability. Given the high accuracy of 4D-CT, efforts to reduce this variation may improve overall preoperative localization in patients with hyperparathyroidism.

Normocalcemic hyperparathyroidism: A Collaborative Endocrine Surgery Quality Improvement Program analysis.

BACKGROUND: Normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism may be more challenging to cure compared with classical primary hyperparathyroidism. The aim of this study was to utilize a multi-institutional database to better characterize this condition. METHODS: The Collaborative Endocrine Surgery Quality Improvement Program database was queried for all patients who underwent parathyroidectomy for sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism. Patient characteristics, operative details, pathology, and outcomes data were compared between patients with normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism and those with hypercalcemia. RESULTS: Among 7,569 patients, 9.7% (733) were normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism. Mean age at surgery and sex were similar for normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism and primary hyperparathyroidism with hypercalcemia. The primary hyperparathyroidism with hypercalcemia cohort had a single parathyroid resected more frequently than the normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism group (73.3%% vs 47.5%, P < .05). Patients with normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism had a higher rate of subtotal (3.5 gland) resection (10.0% vs 4.7%, P < .05). Pathology reported a higher frequency of multigland hyperplasia in the normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism cohort (43.1% vs 21.9%, P <.05). In the normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism cohort, 47 patients (6.4%) underwent remedial surgery compared with 307 patients (4.5%) with primary hyperparathyroidism with hypercalcemia (P < .05). The rate of clinical concern for persistent hyperparathyroidism was similar between the 2 groups (P = .09) but not reported in 25% overall. CONCLUSION: Patients with normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism have higher rates of multigland disease and remedial surgery compared with primary hyperparathyroidism with hypercalcemia.