A randomized, prospective, controlled study comparing uterine preserving laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh versus laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse.

OBJECTIVES: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) significantly affects women's quality of life, occurring in 20-30% of females aged over 20 globally. With aging populations, demand for pelvic reconstructive surgery is rising. Patients seek anatomical restoration while preserving uterus and sexual function. Sacrohysteropexy is the gold standard for apical prolapse, but carries risks. Lateral suspension, offers safer apical and anterior correction especially for obese, sexually active women. Our prospective study compares laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy and lateral suspension objectively and subjectively. STUDY DESIGN: The study included patients who had laparoscopic lateral suspension (n = 22) or laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy (n = 22) for symptomatic stage 2 apical prolapse. Groups randomized with using block design. Anatomical cure was based on measurements taken by the same physician, unaware of intervention, before and at 12 months using POP-Q score. Pelvic floor ultrasound also used for objective rates. Subjective comparison used Prolapse Quality of Life (P-QoL), Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Symptom Score (POP-SS), Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), Visual Analog Score (VAS), and Michigan Incontinence Severity Index (M-ISI). RESULTS: Age, BMI, parity, menopause, sexual activity, complications, showed no significant difference between groups (p > 0.05). Surgical procedure duration significantly varied between groups lateral suspension group was shorter. There was no significant difference in post operative complications. No significant differences in posterior/enterocele stages.) Anterior staging showed no significant difference in sacrouteropexy (p = 0.130), but significant difference in lateral suspension group (p < 0.001). No significant differences in pre-op and post-op PQOL, POP-SS, FSFI, and M-ISI scores between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Both methods effectively managed apical prolapse with similar outcomes. Objective measurements showed lateral suspension's superiority in reducing bladder descent.

Intrapartum ultrasound for fetal head asynclitism: Is it possible to establish a degree of asynclitism to correlate to delivery outcome?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of intrapartum ultrasound (IU) in the diagnosis of asynclitism and the importance of asynclitism degree in labor outcomes. METHOD: This prospective cohort study included 41 low-risk pregnant women with fetus in singleton-vertex. The IU assessment to diagnose asynclitism was performed during labor at two specific steps, including the suspicion and/or diagnosis of labor arrest. The "four-chamber view" and "squint sign without nose" were classified as marked/severe asynclitism. The "midline deviation" and "squint sign with nose" findings were classified as moderate asynclitism. Obstetric outcomes and maternal-fetal complications were compared with the degree of asynclitism. RESULTS: Severe and moderate asynclitism was seen in 17 (41.7%), 10 (58.8%) and seven (41.2%) women, respectively. All pregnant women diagnosed with asynclitism delivered by vacuum extraction (VE) or cesarean section (CS). CS was performed in nine patients with asynclitism (52.9%). The difference between asynclitism type and VE/CS ratios was statistically significant (P = 0.039). Four fetuses with squint sign without nose delivered by VE. A significant correlation was seen between the presence of squint without nose sign and second-/third-degree perineal injury. CONCLUSION: Severe asynclitism is associated with increasing operative birth and maternal-fetal complications. Detection of asynclitism degree by IU could be useful, alerting the obstetrics team to possible perinatal problems during delivery.

COVID-19 related maternal mortality cases in associated with Delta and Omicron waves and the role of lung ultrasound.

Objective: To present coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) related maternal mortality in relation to Delta and Omicron waves and to investigate the role of lung ultrasound (LUS) in estimating mortality. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in the obstetrics and gynecology clinic of a tertiary pandemic hospital between March 2020 and January 2022. The hospitalized pregnant women with COVID-19 diagnosis and maternal deaths were studied in relation with Delta and Omicron waves. The relationship between LUS scores of hospitalized patients and maternal mortality was explored. Results: Thousand and sixty-five pregnant women were hospitalized because of COVID-19 infection. Fifty-one (4.79%) of these patients had critical sickness, 96 (9.01%) of them had severe illness, 62 (5.82%) of them were admitted to the intensive care unit and 28 (2.63%) of all hospitalized pregnant women had died. Of the 1.065 patients, 783 (73.5%) were hospitalized before the Delta wave and the maternal mortality rate was 1.28% (10/783), 243 (22.8%) were hospitalized during the Delta wave and the maternal mortality rate was 7% (17/243) [relative risk (RR)=5.478, 95% confidence interval (CI) (2.54-11.8), z=4.342, p<0.001]. During the Omicron wave 39 (3.66%) patients were hospitalized and the maternal mortality rate was 2.56% (1/39). Maternal mortality rates, according to LUS scores, were 0.37% (1/273) for LUS 0, 0.72% (2/277) for LUS 1, 2.58% (10/387) for LUS 2 and 11.72% (15/128) for LUS 3 respectively (LUS 3 vs. others; maternal mortality: RR=8.447, 95% CI (4.11-17.34), z=5.814, p<0.0001). There were no vaccinated patients in the study cohort. Conclusion: The maternal mortality rate was relatively high, particularly during the Delta wave at our referral center. The Delta wave, delayed vaccination and vaccine hesitancy of pregnant women might have important roles in maternal mortality. Higher LUS scores should warn clinicians of an increased risk of maternal death.