Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Science ; 380(6650): 1155-1160, 2023 06 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37319199

RESUMO

A global survey of coral reefs reveals that overfishing is driving resident shark species toward extinction, causing diversity deficits in reef elasmobranch (shark and ray) assemblages. Our species-level analysis revealed global declines of 60 to 73% for five common resident reef shark species and that individual shark species were not detected at 34 to 47% of surveyed reefs. As reefs become more shark-depleted, rays begin to dominate assemblages. Shark-dominated assemblages persist in wealthy nations with strong governance and in highly protected areas, whereas poverty, weak governance, and a lack of shark management are associated with depauperate assemblages mainly composed of rays. Without action to address these diversity deficits, loss of ecological function and ecosystem services will increasingly affect human communities.


Assuntos
Conservação dos Recursos Naturais , Recifes de Corais , Extinção Biológica , Tubarões , Rajidae , Animais , Humanos , Pesqueiros , Biodiversidade
3.
Trends Ecol Evol ; 31(5): 395-407, 2016 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26975420

RESUMO

Sharks are considered the apex predator of coral reefs, but the consequences of their global depletion are uncertain. Here we explore the ecological roles of sharks on coral reefs and, conversely, the importance of reefs for sharks. We find that most reef-associated shark species do not act as apex predators but instead function as mesopredators along with a diverse group of reef fish. While sharks perform important direct and indirect ecological roles, the evidence to support hypothesised shark-driven trophic cascades that benefit corals is weak and equivocal. Coral reefs provide some functional benefits to sharks, but sharks do not appear to favour healthier reef environments. Restoring populations of sharks is important and can yet deliver ecological surprise.


Assuntos
Recifes de Corais , Tubarões , Animais , Antozoários , Ecologia , Peixes
4.
Mar Pollut Bull ; 51(1-4): 408-14, 2005.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15757739

RESUMO

Successful settlement and recruitment of corals is critical to the resilience of coral reefs. Given that many degraded reefs are dominated by benthic algae, recovery of coral populations after bleaching and other disturbances requires successful settlement amidst benthic algae. Algal turfs often accumulate sediments, sediments are known to inhibit coral settlement, and reefs with high inputs of terrestrial sediments are often dominated by turfs. We investigated the impacts of two algal turf assemblages, and of sediment deposits, on settlement of the coral Acropora millepora (Ehrenberg). Adding sediment reduced coral settlement, but the effects of different algal turfs varied. In one case, algal turfs inhibited coral settlement, whereas the other turf only inhibited settlement when combined with sediments. These results provide the first direct, experimental evidence of effects of filamentous algal turfs on coral settlement, the variability in those effects, and the potential combined effects of algal turfs and trapped sediments.


Assuntos
Antozoários/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Eucariotos , Animais , Ecossistema , Monitoramento Ambiental , Sedimentos Geológicos , Larva/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Mortalidade , Queensland
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...