Safety, immunogenicity and immediate pain of intramuscular versus subcutaneous administration of a measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine to children aged 11-21 months.

This study compared intramuscular and subcutaneous administration of two doses of measles-mumps-rubella-varicella (MMRV) combination vaccine (Priorix-Tetra, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals) in children. Healthy children (N = 328) were randomised to receive MMRV either intramuscularly or subcutaneously. Reactogenicity was similar between treatment groups for immediate vaccination pain, vaccination site pain, redness and incidence of fever and rashes. Slightly less vaccination site swelling occurred during days 0-3 of the post-vaccination period after intramuscular administration. Seroconversion rates for all components, 42-56 days post-dose 2, ranged from 99.3% to 100% in the intramuscular group and from 98.6% to 100% in the subcutaneous. Cell-mediated immunity data supported the humoral immunogenicity findings. In summary, the MMRV vaccine is well tolerated and highly immunogenic when administered either subcutaneously or intramuscularly to children in the second year of life.

Universal mass vaccination against varicella in Germany using an MMRV combination vaccine with a two-dose schedule: an economic analysis.

Former economic analyses have shown that universal mass vaccination of infants against varicella using a one-dose schedule is cost-saving in Germany. In July 2006, an MMRV combination vaccine has been approved in Germany which shall be given in a two-dose schedule. We re-analysed our former analysis with the EVITA model in order to prove whether our former conclusion that universal mass vaccination against varicella is cost-saving is still valid when using a two-dose schedule vaccine. Indeed we found that universal mass vaccination of infants against varicella with a two-dose vaccine is cost-saving from societal as well as from health care perspective.

Immunogenicity and safety of two doses of tetravalent measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine in healthy children.

BACKGROUND: Combination vaccines against common childhood diseases are widely used, provide an improved coverage, are more convenient and are more cost-effective than multiple injections. We conducted a study to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a combined measles-mumps-rubella-varicella (MMRV) candidate vaccine in comparison with the separate administration of licensed measles-mumps-rubella (MMR; Priorix) and varicella (V; Varilrix) vaccines. METHODS: Healthy children 12-18 months of age received 2 doses of MMRV vaccine (3 lots) 6-8 weeks apart (MMRV group) or 1 dose of MMR vaccine administered concomitantly with 1 dose of varicella vaccine, followed by a second dose of MMR at 6-8 weeks later (MMR+V group). Local symptoms (redness, pain and swelling) were recorded for 4 days after vaccination, and fever (any, axillary temperature > or =37.5 degrees C or rectal temperature > or =38.0 degrees C; grade 3, axillary temperature >39.0 degrees C or rectal temperature >39.5 degrees C) was monitored daily for 15 days. Other adverse events were monitored for 6 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 494 children were vaccinated (371 in the MMRV group and 123 in the MMR+V group. Two doses of MMRV vaccine were at least as immunogenic as 2 doses of MMR and 1 dose of varicella vaccine. After the second dose, all children had seroconverted to measles, rubella and varicella in both vaccine groups, and 98% versus 99% had seroconverted to mumps in the MMRV versus the MMR+V group, respectively. The MMRV vaccine did not induce an increased local or general reactogenicity compared with the separate administration, although a higher incidence of low grade fever was seen after the first dose in the MMRV group (67.7% after MMRV versus 48.8% after MMR+V; P < 0.05), this was not observed for grade 3 fever (11.6% after MMRV versus 10.6% after MMR+V; P = 0.87). After the second dose, no differences in incidence of fever were found in either MMRV or MMR+V groups. CONCLUSION: Administration of 2 doses of the combined MMRV vaccine was as immunogenic and well-tolerated as separate injections of MMR and varicella vaccine.

Can varicella be eliminated by vaccination? Potential clinical and economic effects of universal childhood varicella immunisation in Germany.

Varicella is a potentially serious infection not only in immunocompromised individuals but also in otherwise healthy adults and children. Vaccination plays an important role in preventing the disease and its sequelae. A universal vaccination in childhood is expected to reduce substantially the number of uncomplicated cases of varicella and decrease the number of complicated cases requiring hospitalisation. To generate data as basis for decisions of the health authorities concerning prevention of varicella, epidemiological and health-economic data were collected in two studies. Using an age-structured decision analytic model the benefits, costs and cost effectiveness of a varicella immunisation program for a period of 30 years were assessed. It was shown that after the first year of life seroprevalence rates increased steadily and reached 62% among the 4- to 5-year olds and 94% among the 10- to 11-year olds, respectively; 90% of varicella patients were younger than 12 years. A severe course was assessed for 16.3% of the cases. Overall incidence of complications was estimated to be 5.7%. A routine varicella vaccination program targeting healthy children could prevent 82.7% of varicella cases and over 4,700 major complications per year provided the coverage level was 85%. Under these conditions the elimination of varicella is predicted to be achievable within 18 years. It is expected that a combined measles, mumps, rubella and varicella vaccine could provide the required coverage. Average yearly discounted net cost savings of universal childhood vaccination are 51 million Euro with a benefit-cost ratio of 4.12. Childhood vaccination with catch-up of adolescents provides additional clinical benefits. The break-even point indicating first net savings could be achieved already 3 years after the implementation of the vaccination program. In summary, routine childhood varicella vaccination appears to be a highly efficient strategy to significantly reduce the sizeable burden of varicella and would lead to net savings from both the societal but also the payer perspective.