Improved Alertness Is Associated with Early Increase in Serum Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor and Antidepressant Treatment Outcome in Major Depression.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In major depression cognitive impairment is common and may persist despite improvement in psychopathology. So far it is unclear how closely related improvement in cognitive functioning is to the clinical course of depression. Further, it is unclear whether recovery from cognitive impairment is linked to changes in serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (sBDNF). The objectives of this study were (1) to explore the predictive value of cognitive impairment for therapeutic outcome, and (2) to assess the association between cognitive performance and sBDNF levels over a 6-week course of antidepressant treatment. METHODS: Twenty-five adult patients suffering from major depression underwent standardized treatment with duloxetine. Both severity of depression as assessed by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and sBDNF levels were measured at baseline, and after 1, 2 and 6 weeks of treatment. Cognitive performance, i.e. alertness, working memory, and divided attention, was assessed at baseline, after 1 week, and at the end of treatment after 6 weeks. RESULTS: Higher performance in alertness and divided attention at baseline correlated with less severe depression at week 6. During the first week of treatment, a greater increase in sBDNF was associated with a greater improvement in alertness at week 6. CONCLUSION: Greater alertness at baseline was a predictor of favorable antidepressive treatment outcome. Moreover, the early increase in sBDNF correlated with improvement in attention functioning. Thus, recovery from cognitive impairment and an early increase in sBDNF seem to be associated.

High baseline BDNF serum levels and early psychopathological improvement are predictive of treatment outcome in major depression.

RATIONALE: Major depressive disorder has been associated with low serum levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (sBDNF), which is functionally involved in neuroplasticity. Although sBDNF levels tend to normalize following psychopathological improvement with antidepressant treatment, it is unclear how closely sBDNF changes are associated with treatment outcome. OBJECTIVES: To examine whether baseline sBDNF or early changes in sBDNF are predictive of response to therapy. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with major depressive disorder underwent standardized treatment with duloxetine. Severity of depression, measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and sBDNF were assessed at baseline, and after 1, 2, and 6 weeks of treatment. Therapy outcome after 6 weeks was defined as response (≥50 % reduction in baseline Hamilton Depression Rating score) and remission (Hamilton Depression Rating score <8). The predictive values for treatment outcome of baseline sBDNF, and early (i.e., ≤2 weeks) changes in sBDNF and Hamilton Depression Rating score were also assessed. RESULTS: At baseline, sBDNF correlated with Hamilton Depression Rating scores. Treatment response was associated with a higher baseline sBDNF concentration, and a greater Hamilton Depression Rating score reduction after 1 and 2 weeks. A greater early rise in sBDNF correlated with a decreased early Hamilton Depression Rating score reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Even though higher baseline sBDNF levels are associated with more severe depression, they may reflect an increased capacity to respond to treatment. In contrast, changes in sBDNF over the full course of treatment are not associated with psychopathological improvement.

The results of the Swiss observational study of the new, fast-dissolving mirtazapine formulation in depressed patients.

Objective. The purpose of the present study was to document the experience with the use of a new, fast-dissolving oral tablet (FDT, RemeronSolTab®) of mirtazapine, a NaSSA antidepressant, in the treatment of depressed patients in daily practice in Switzerland. Methods. It was an open, prospective collection of observations in a total of 1121 depressive patients (>18 years old, both sexes). The treatment duration was 8 weeks with assessments after the second and eighth week. Efficacy measures were CGI (seven points) and specific check-lists for the ratings of severity of anxiety and sleep disturbances. At the end of the trial the acceptance (eight-item questionnaire) of the new formulation was recorded too. Results. The results showed that there was highly significant (P<0.001) and rapid improvement of severity of depression, anxiety and sleep disturbances in the whole population. Subgroup analyses showed that the antidepressant efficacy was independent of gender, initial severity of depression or of the type of depression (first episode, recurrent, chronic depression). The majority of patients (80%) liked at least one of the properties of FDT and, out of 75% of patients having experience with conventional tablet, 50% stated to be better compliant with this new formulation. Conclusion. This report documents the antidepressant efficacy of mirtazapine FDT. The new formulation found good acceptance by the patients. The results also suggest a likelihood of improved compliance with the mirtazapine FDT.