Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Assunto principal
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Hum Immunol ; 79(10): 711-715, 2018 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30081064

RESUMO

Flow cytometric crossmatches (FCXM) are routinely performed to support living-donor renal transplantation. While long a laboratory mainstay, a physical crossmatch is costly, time consuming, and frequently poses interpretative conundrums with both false-positive and false- negative results. Given the increased utilization of the virtual crossmatch (vXM) in the deceased donor setting, our aim was to assess its utility in living donor evaluations. We reviewed 100 living donor FCXMs and retrospectively performed a vXM for each pair. Seventy-five (75) cases were concordant, (i.e., FCXM-/vXM- or FCXM+/vXM+) while 25 cases were discordant; Five were vXM+/FCXM- and 20 were FCXM+/vXM-. Since donor-specific antibodies (DSA) were not detected in the 20 FCXM+/vXM- cases, these were interpreted as false-positive, i.e., due to non-HLA antibodies. Importantly, none of these patients, when transplanted across a positive FCXM, experienced early antibody mediated rejection or subsequently developed HLA DSA. These data reveal that, for the vast majority of living donor evaluations, a vXM is an acceptable vetting procedure.


Assuntos
Doadores Vivos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Citometria de Fluxo , Teste de Histocompatibilidade/métodos , Humanos , Lactente , Transplante de Rim , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...