Protein-enriched, milk-based supplement to counteract sarcopenia in acutely ill geriatric patients offered resistance exercise training during and after hospitalisation: study protocol for a randomised, double-blind, multicentre trial.

INTRODUCTION: Age-related loss of muscle mass and strength, sarcopaenia, burdens many older adults. The process is accelerated with bed rest, protein intakes below requirements and the catabolic effect of certain illnesses. Thus, acutely ill, hospitalised older adults are particularly vulnerable. Protein supplementation can preserve muscle mass and/or strength and, combining this with resistance exercise training (RT), may have additional benefits. Therefore, this study investigates the effect of protein supplementation as an addition to offering RT among older adults while admitted to the geriatric ward and after discharge. This has not previously been investigated. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In a block-randomised, double-blind, multicentre intervention study, 165 older adults above 70 years, fulfilling the eligibility criteria, will be included consecutively from three medical departments (blocks of n=20, stratified by recruitment site). After inclusion, participants will be randomly allocated (1:1) to receive either ready-to-drink, protein-enriched, milk-based supplements (a total of 27.5 g whey protein/day) or isoenergetic placebo products (<1.5 g protein/day), twice daily as a supplement to their habitual diet. Both groups will be offered a standardised RT programme for lower extremity muscle strength (daily while hospitalised and 4×/week after discharge). The study period starts during their hospital stay and continues 12 weeks after discharge. The primary endpoint is lower extremity muscle strength and function (30 s chair-stand-test). Secondary endpoints include muscle mass, measures of physical function and measures related to cost-effectiveness. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval is given by the Research Ethic Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark (reference no. H-16018240) and the Danish Data Protection Agency (reference no. HGH-2016-050). There are no expected risks associated with participation, and each participant is expected to benefit from the RT. Results will be published in peer-reviewed international journals and presented at national and international congresses and symposiums. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02717819 (9 March 2016).

Follow-up home visits with registered dietitians have a positive effect on the functional and nutritional status of geriatric medical patients after discharge: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the additional benefits of individualized nutritional counselling by a registered dietitian in geriatric patients' home after discharge from hospital, in relation to risk of re-admissions, functional status, nutritional status, use of social services and mortality. DESIGN: Twelve-week single-blind randomized controlled study. SETTING AND SUBJECTS: Geriatric medical patients (65+ years) at nutritional risk. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly allocated to receive a visit in their homes, either three individualized nutritional counselling by a registered dietitian complemented with three follow-up visits by general practitioners or three follow-up visits by general practitioners alone. MAIN MEASURES: Primary outcome was risk of re-admissions. Secondary outcomes were functional status (hand grip strength, chair stand, mobility, disability and tiredness in daily activities, rehabilitation capacity), nutritional status (weight, BMI, energy and protein intake), need of social services (home care, home nursing, meals-on-wheels) and mortality. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-two patients were included; 132 (87%) completed the first and 124 (82%) the second data collection after 12 weeks. Ten per cent of the participants had three contacts with their general practitioner, while compliance with the dietetic intervention was almost 100%. Odds ratio for re-admission and mortality after 26 weeks was 1.62 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85 to 3.10) and 0.60 (95% CI 0.17 to 2.13). The intervention had a positive effect on functional status (i.e. mobility, P = 0.029), and nutritional status (i.e. weight, P = 0.035; energy intake, P < 0.001; protein intake, P = 0.001) and the use of meals-on wheels was reduced (P = 0.084). CONCLUSION: Follow-up home visits with registered dietitians have a positive effect on the functional and nutritional status of geriatric medical patients after discharge.

Effect of moderate intakes of different tea catechins and caffeine on acute measures of energy metabolism under sedentary conditions.

Green tea may stimulate energy metabolism; however, it is unclear if acute effects are caused by specific catechins, caffeine or their combination. The objective of the present study was to examine the separate and combined effects of different catechins and caffeine on energy expenditure (EE) and fat oxidation over a single day. Fifteen healthy, normal-weight males received capsules containing placebo, caffeine alone (150 mg), or caffeine plus a catechin mixture (600 mg) enriched in either epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), epigallocatechin or a mix of catechins, in a randomised cross-over double-blinded design. On each test day EE, respiratory quotient (RQ) and substrate oxidation were measured under sedentary conditions in a respiratory chamber for 13.5 h. We found no significant treatment effect on EE (P = 0.20) or RQ (P = 0.68). EGCG with caffeine insignificantly raised EE and fat oxidation v. caffeine-only and placebo (EE 5.71 (SE 0.12) v. 5.68 (SE 0.14) v. 5.59 (SE 0.13) MJ/12.5 h, respectively; fat oxidation 84.8 (SE 5.2) v. 80.7 (SE 4.7) v. 76.8 (SE 4.0) g/12.5 h). Catechin/caffeine combinations at these dosages and mode of application had non-significant acute effects on EE and fat oxidation. The maximum observed effect on EE of about 2 % could still be meaningful for energy balance over much longer period of exposure. However, higher short-term effects reported in the literature may reflect variations in green tea extracts, added caffeine, or synergies with physical activity. The specific mechanisms and conditions that may underpin observed longer-term benefits of catechin-enriched green tea consumption on body composition remain to be confirmed.

The effect of salatrim, a low-calorie modified triacylglycerol, on appetite and energy intake.

BACKGROUND: Salatrim is modified triacylglycerol that is rich in short-chain fatty acids and stearic acid. It is used as a lower-calorie fat replacer. In addition, it has been hypothesized that salatrim's reduced absorption in the small intestine may lead to greater amounts of fat in the gastrointestinal tract, which may decrease appetite and energy intake through the release of appetite-regulating gastrointestinal hormones. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the effects of salatrim and traditional fat on appetite, ad libitum energy intake, and gastrointestinal hormones. DESIGN: Twenty-two healthy, young, normal-weight men participated in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Test meals were a traditional fat meal and a salatrim meal with a mixture of traditional fat and salatrim. Visual analogue scales were used to record appetite and well-being every 30 min, and blood was sampled frequently. An ad libitum lunch was served 4.5 h after the test meal. RESULTS: The salatrim meal increased fullness (P = 0.04) and decreased hunger (P = 0.06) significantly more than did the traditional fat meal. The traditional fat meal increased well-being (P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in ad libitum energy intake or overall energy intake between the 2 test days. No significant differences in blood glucose, insulin, triacylglycerol, ghrelin, cholecystokinin, glucagon-like peptide-1, or peptide YY concentrations were found. A significantly (P = 0.01) smaller increase in free fatty acids was observed after the salatrim meal than after the traditional fat meal. CONCLUSIONS: Salatrim had a modestly more suppressive effect on appetite than did a traditional fat. Gastrointestinal hormones did not seem to be involved.

Reproducibility and power of ad libitum energy intake assessed by repeated single meals.

BACKGROUND: The reproducibility of the measurement of ad libitum energy intake (EI) is not well known. Furthermore, it is not known whether standardized conditions before the test day influence this measure. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to examine the reproducibility and power of the measurement of ad libitum EI with and without prior diet standardization. DESIGN: Fifty-five healthy, normal-weight men were tested in 2 groups, one with (D, n = 32) and one without (ND, n = 23) prior diet standardization, on 2 different identical occasions. They were given a standardized energy-fixed breakfast and then an ad libitum lunch 4.5 h later. Reproducibility was assessed by the coefficient of repeatability. RESULTS: No effect of prior diet standardization was seen on the reproducibility of ad libitum EI (P = 0.56), but diet standardization increased ad libitum EI significantly (P < 0.001). The correlation between ad libitum EI on the 2 test days was r = 0.861 (R(2) = 0.742, P < 0.0001) and r = 0.654 (R(2) = 0.428, P < 0.001) in the D and ND groups, respectively. The coefficient of repeatability and CV were 1478 kJ and 8.9% compared with 1831 kJ and 14.5% in the D and ND groups, respectively. A paired design with a study power of 0.8 requires 17 and 26 subjects, with and without prior diet standardization, respectively, to detect a difference of 500 kJ in EI. CONCLUSIONS: The ad libitum test meal used to measure spontaneous EI is reproducible, and the reproducibility does not seem to be influenced by prior standardization. However, prior diet standardization exerts a significant effect on ad libitum EI.

Increased 24-h energy expenditure in type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether overweight and obese individuals with type 2 diabetes have higher basal and 24-h energy expenditure compared with healthy control subjects before and after adjustment for body composition, spontaneous physical activity (SPA), sex, and age. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Data from 31 subjects with type 2 diabetes and 61 nondiabetic control subjects were analyzed. The 24-h energy expenditure, basal metabolic rate (BMR), and sleeping energy expenditure (EEsleep) between 1:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. were measured in whole-body respiratory chambers. Body composition was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). RESULTS: No significant differences in unadjusted EEsleep, BMR, and 24-h energy expenditure were observed between the type 2 diabetic group and the control group. After adjustment for fat-free mass (FFM), fat mass, SPA, sex, and age, EEsleep and BMR were, respectively, 7.7 and 6.9% higher in the type 2 diabetic group compared with the control group. This was equivalent to 144 +/- 40 kcal/day (P = 0.001) and 139 +/- 61 kcal/day (P = 0.026), respectively. Adjusted 24-h energy expenditure was 6.5% higher in the type 2 diabetic group compared with the nondiabetic control subjects (2,679 +/- 37 vs. 2,515 +/- 23 kcal/day, P = 0.002). In multiple regression analyses, FFM, fat mass, SPA, and diabetes status were all significant determinants of EEsleep and 24-h energy expenditure, explaining 83 and 81% of the variation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms reports in Pima Indians that basal and 24-h energy expenditure adjusted for body composition, SPA, sex, and age are higher in individuals with type 2 diabetes compared with nondiabetic control subjects and may be even more pronounced in Caucasians.