Advancing Pediatric Care: The virtualKIDS Experience in Nursing-Led Audio-Visual Clinical Services.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the escalating trend of pediatric patients, particularly non-urgent cases, going to the emergency departments (EDs) in New South Wales, Australia, prompted the establishment of virtualKIDS, a nursing-led telehealth service. This service, initiated in June 2021, operates 24/7 and provides comprehensive care through audio-visual consultations emphasizing a patient-centered approach. Three elements-COVID-19 Outpatient Response Team (CORT), virtualKIDS Acute Review (vKAR), and Virtual Urgent Care (VUC)-addressed specific needs during and beyond the pandemic, showcasing the adaptability and impact of virtual care. vKAR focuses on post-discharge support, allowing families access to telehealth for up to three days. Preliminary data indicates a 44% reduction in ED visits within 48 h. VUC employs nursing-led triaging paired with audiovisual assessment, demonstrating a 69% hospitalization avoidance rate. Hybrid ambulatory models such as a sleep study at home project, day-only tonsillectomies, and arthroscopic knee surgeries showcase innovative approaches to reducing hospital admissions and enhancing patient outcomes. This paper presents the evolution and diverse models of care implemented by the virtualKIDS service, offering insights into its potential as a nursing-led alternative to ED visits in acute-care pediatrics.

COVID-19 pandemic: The impact on vulnerable children and young people in Australia.

The COVID-19 pandemic and associated system disruptions are impacting all children and young people (CYP) in Australia. For vulnerable groups of CYP, who already experience poorer health and well-being, these impacts are amplified. Challenges include reduced access to usual services, reduced community supports, financial instability, unemployment and other life circumstances that threaten to widen pre-existing inequities. This article aims to present the reasons for vulnerability of CYP during the pandemic, and to focus on actions by health professionals that mitigate additional challenges to their health and well-being. Using a rapid review of the literature and team-based discussions, eight vulnerable groups were identified: CYP with disabilities, mental health conditions and chronic diseases; CYP facing financial hardship; within the child protection system; Aboriginal; migrant and refugee; in residential care; rural; and isolated CYP. Recommendations for action are required at the level of governments, health professionals and researchers and include enhancing access to health and social supports, prioritising vulnerable CYP in resuming health activity and elevating the voice of CYP in designing the response. The pandemic can be conceptualised as an opportunity to create a more equitable society as we document the inequities that have been exacerbated. Vulnerable groups of CYP must be recognised and heard, and targeted actions must focus on improving their health outcomes during the pandemic and beyond.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health-care delivery: The views of health-care professionals in Sydney's tertiary paediatric hospitals.

AIM: To determine the cultural competency training, knowledge and attitudes of health professionals about Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (hereafter referred to as Aboriginal) health-care delivery. METHODS: Survey of medical (n = 200), nursing (n = 200) and other health professionals (n = 210) working in two tertiary paediatric hospitals in December 2013. The main outcome measures were training in Aboriginal health-care delivery, knowledge of Aboriginal health and services, attitudes to identification of Aboriginal patients and suggested ways to improve health-care delivery to Aboriginal patients. RESULTS: We received responses from 286 of 572 (50.0%) staff with valid emails: 75 medical, 88 nursing and 123 other health professionals. A minority reported receiving specific Aboriginal health training (126/286, 44.8%) and Aboriginal cultural competency training (106/286, 37.1%). Medical staff were less likely than others to report Aboriginal health-care training (P = 0.01), cultural competency training (P < 0.001) and that their training equipped them to manage Aboriginal patients (P = 0.04). Few medical staff reported a good/very good knowledge of the services provided by the Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services (20.0%), the Federal Government Closing the Gap initiative (14.7%) or the Royal Australasian College of Physicians' Reconciliation Action Plan (8.0%). Only 62 of 286 (21.7%) staff agreed that they usually asked patients/parents whether they identified as Aboriginal. Although 256 of 286 (89.5%) agreed that Aboriginal staff were an important resource, only 125 of 286 (43.7%) had referred Aboriginal patients to one. CONCLUSION: The opportunities we have identified to improve health-care delivery to Aboriginal patients include: increasing Aboriginal cultural competency training, correct identification of Aboriginal patients, referring Aboriginal patients to Aboriginal health-care services and increased awareness of Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services.

Improving delivery of health care to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children.

AIM: To identify opportunities to improve health-care delivery for urban Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children requiring hospital admission and to determine their characteristics. METHODS: We analysed all documentation of admissions of Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander children to a tertiary paediatric hospital in 2010. We reviewed the medical records to determine whether the Aboriginal status of patients was known, whether Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander children and their families were reviewed by Aboriginal staff during admission and whether basic health-care quality indicators were met, including documentation of anthropometry, ear examination findings, immunisation status and catch-up immunisation delivery. RESULTS: In 2010, 543 (2%) patients admitted to the institution were identified as Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander: 140/538 (26.0%) were from the first decile (most disadvantaged) on Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas index. Of all admitted children, 148/543 (27.3%) were referred to Aboriginal health professionals during admission, more when length of stay was greater than 7 days (61% vs. 23%, P < 0.001). There was documentation of weight in 533/543 (98.2%), ear examinations in 64/543 (11.8%), immunisations being not up to date in 126/543 (23%), catch-up immunisation given in 7/126 (5.6%), Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander status in 8/543 (1.5%) medical and 1/543 (0.2%) nursing discharge summaries. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified several opportunities to improve culturally appropriate health-care delivery for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children admitted to hospital, including improved recognition of Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander status of patients, improved access to Aboriginal health professionals and increased performance and documentation of basic anthropometry, ear examination and immunisation catch-up.