Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38807930

RESUMO

Penicillin (PCN) allergy delabeling is an important component of antimicrobial stewardship; however, widespread implementation has lagged. We found that most patients had low-risk PCN allergy histories eligible for delabeling without skin testing. Pharmacist-led risk stratification and drug challenge expanded access to delabeling independently from an Allergy/Immunology service.

2.
Int J Med Sci ; 20(4): 437-443, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37057217

RESUMO

Background: This study compares treatment failure for patients who received oral beta-lactams (BLs) and fluoroquinolones (FQs) for stepdown treatment of Enterobacterales bloodstream infections (BSIs). Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective, age- and sex-matched, cohort study, at a Veterans Affairs (VA) hospital in South Texas. Eligible patients were at least 18 years of age with a monomicrobial BSI treated with a single oral BL or FQ antibiotic. Treatment failure was defined as recurrence or all-cause mortality within 90 days of documented BSI. Bivariate (chi-square, Fisher's Exact, and Wilcoxon Rank Sum) and multivariate (logistic regression) statistical tests were used to compare groups. Results: A total of 130 patients were included in this study, with 65 patients per group. Groups were well balanced with respect to exact age, sex assigned at birth, Caucasian race, source control, intensive care unit admission, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Importantly, 60% of patients in the BL group had cultures that were resistant to FQs and 71% were prescribed cefpodoxime. Patients in the BL group had higher median (interquartile range [IQR]) Pitt bacteremia scores than those in the FQ group: 2 (1-4) vs. 1 (1-2), p=0.04. Patients in the BL group also had a higher median (IQR) duration of intravenous (IV) antibiotics than those in the FQ group: 5 (3-7) vs. 4 (3-5), p=0.02. Treatment failure was statistically comparable for patients in the BL and FQ groups: 15% vs. 12%, p=0.61. This finding was consistent in a multivariate logistic regression model with group (BL vs. FQ) as the independent variable, treatment failure as the dependent variable, and Pitt bacteremia score and duration of IV antibiotics as covariates (OR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.27-2.18). One patient in the FQ group experienced Clostridioides difficile infection. Conclusion: This study suggests that BLs may be as effective as FQs for oral stepdown treatment of Enterobacterales BSI without the potential associated risks. Furthermore, in the setting of FQ-resistant Enterobacterales BSI secondary to urinary source, third generation oral cephalosporins (i.e., cefpodoxime) may be reasonable alternatives.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Fluoroquinolonas , Recém-Nascido , Humanos , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapêutico , beta-Lactamas/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Coortes , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Cefpodoxima
3.
BMJ Case Rep ; 15(2)2022 Feb 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35131767

RESUMO

A male patient with right total knee arthroplasty complicated by prosthetic joint infection on intravenous antimicrobials developed an acute kidney injury (AKI) with creatinine up to 7.3 mg/dL ('normal' range (0.5-1.2 mg/dL)) after hardware removal and tobramycin loaded polymethylmethacrylate beads and spacer placement. The AKI was initially attributed to intravenous vancomycin. Despite discontinuing vancomycin, the AKI worsened. A tobramycin level was collected and resulted at 5.5 µg/mL. Due to high suspicion for aminoglycoside-induced renal toxicity and to prevent haemodialysis, the antibiotic cement spacer with tobramycin-impregnated beads was removed. After the removal, tobramycin level rapidly decreased and renal functions improved. AKI is an increasingly recognised complication related to antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) due to the systemic absorption of antibiotics. With this case we highlight the early recognition of ALBC-induced renal toxicity necessitating explantation of ALBC and beads in order to prevent haemodialysis and emphasise monitoring aminoglycoside levels in the early postoperative period.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Injúria Renal Aguda/induzido quimicamente , Injúria Renal Aguda/terapia , Antibacterianos , Cimentos Ósseos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Diálise Renal , Tobramicina/efeitos adversos , Vancomicina/efeitos adversos
4.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 7(9): ofaa320, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32959015

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2 ) is responsible for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a disease that had not been previously described and for which clinicians need to rapidly adapt their daily practice. The novelty of SARS-CoV-2 produced significant gaps in harmonization of definitions, data collection, and outcome reporting to identify patients who would benefit from potential interventions. METHODS: We describe a multicenter collaboration to develop a comprehensive data collection tool for the evaluation and management of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients. The proposed tool was developed by a multidisciplinary working group of infectious disease physicians, intensivists, and infectious diseases/antimicrobial stewardship pharmacists. The working group regularly reviewed literature to select important patient characteristics, diagnostics, and outcomes for inclusion. The data collection tool consisted of spreadsheets developed to collect data from the electronic medical record and track the clinical course after treatments. RESULTS: Data collection focused on demographics and exposure epidemiology, prior medical history and medications, signs and symptoms, diagnostic test results, interventions, clinical outcomes, and complications. During the pilot validation phase, there was <10% missing data for most domains and components. Team members noted improved efficiency and decision making by using the tool during interdisciplinary rounds. CONCLUSIONS: We present the development of a COVID-19 data collection tool and propose its use to effectively assemble harmonized data of hospitalized individuals with COVID-19. This tool can be used by clinicians, researchers, and quality improvement healthcare teams. It has the potential to facilitate interdisciplinary rounds, provide comparisons across different hospitalized populations, and adapt to emerging challenges posed by the pandemic.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...