Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
J Pediatr Health Care ; 36(6): 560-569, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35788313

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Using self-determination theory, we explored relationships between autonomous motivation (AM) and perceived competence (PC) with previously validated measures of motivation and adolescent-reported asthma medication adherence. METHOD: Data were from adolescents (n = 260) enrolled in the School-Based Asthma Care for Teens study and taking preventive medication at baseline. Eligible adolescents (aged 12-16 years) had physician-diagnosed persistent asthma or poor control. RESULTS: Adolescents taking daily preventive medicine reported higher AM and PC for adherence, whereas adolescents likely to miss ≥1 dose in the next 2 weeks had lower AM and PC. Adolescents taking medicines as prescribed, with plans to continue, and those feeling able to follow provider care plans, had higher AM and PC. Findings remained significant in regressions with control variables. DISCUSSION: Many factors interfere with adolescent medication-taking. Clinicians' efforts to build AM and PC with patients and caregivers may be key to promoting adherence in this group.

2.
J Asthma ; 59(3): 494-506, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33307900

RESUMO

Urban adolescents with asthma often have inadequate preventive care. We tested the effectiveness of the School-Based Asthma Care for Teens (SB-ACT) program on asthma morbidity and preventive medication adherence.Methods:Subjects/Setting- 12-16yr olds with persistent asthma in Rochester, NY schools. Design- 3-group randomized trial (2014-2019). SB-ACT Intervention- Two core components: 1) Directly observed therapy (DOT) of preventive asthma medications, provided in school for at least 6-8 weeks for the teen to learn proper technique and experience the benefits of daily preventive therapy; 2) 4-6 weeks later, 3 sessions of motivational interviewing (MI) to discuss potential benefits from DOT and enhance motivation to take medication independently. We included 2 comparison groups: 1) DOT-only for 6-8wks, and 2) asthma education (AE) attention control. Masked follow-up assessments were conducted at 3, 5, and 7mos. Outcomes- Mean number of symptom-free days (SFDs)/2 weeks and medication adherence. Analyses- Modified intention-to-treat repeated measures analysis.Results: We enrolled 430 teens (56% Black, 32% Hispanic, 85% Medicaid). There were no group differences at baseline. We found no difference in SFDs at any follow-up timepoint. More teens in the SB-ACT and DOT-only groups reported having a preventive asthma medication at each follow-up (p<.001), and almost daily adherence at 3 and 5-months (p<.001, p=.003) compared to AE. By 7 months there were no significant differences between groups in adherence (p=.49).Conclusion: SB-ACT improved preventive medication availability and short-term adherence but did not impact asthma symptoms. Further work is needed to create developmentally appropriate and effective interventions for this group.


Assuntos
Asma , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Instituições Acadêmicas , Adolescente , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Asma/epidemiologia , Asma/prevenção & controle , Seguimentos , Humanos , Adesão à Medicação/psicologia , Morbidade , New York/epidemiologia , População Urbana
3.
Acad Pediatr ; 19(6): 608-614, 2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30578922

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Asthma is the most common chronic disease of childhood in the United States, disproportionately affecting urban, poor, and minority children. Adolescents are at high risk for poor asthma outcomes and for depressive symptoms. The purpose of this study is to investigate associations between depressive symptoms and asthma-related clinical and functional outcomes among urban teens. METHODS: We used baseline data from a 3-arm randomized trial, School-Based Asthma Care for Teens, in Rochester, NY. We used the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale with a standard cutoff score of 16 to identify subjects at risk for clinical depression. We used structured in-home surveys and validated scales to assess clinical and functional outcomes and conducted bivariate and multivariate analyses to evaluate differences between groups. RESULTS: We identified 277 eligible teens (ages 12 to 16, 80% participation, 54% black, 34% Hispanic, 45% female, 84% on Medicaid). Overall, 28% reported depressive symptoms. Teens with depressive symptoms experienced greater asthma symptom severity and more acute health care utilization for asthma (all P < .001); however, there was no difference in preventive care use between groups. Teens with depressive symptoms also reported lower asthma-related quality of life (P < .001), less sleep (P < .001), and more limitation in mild (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34-5.02) and moderate (aOR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.41-4.61) activity and in gym (aOR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.30-4.17). CONCLUSIONS: Depressive symptoms are prevalent among urban teens with asthma and are associated with worse asthma-related clinical outcomes, functional limitation, and quality of life. Providers should consider depression as a significant comorbidity that may impact multiple aspects of daily life for this population.


Assuntos
Asma/psicologia , Depressão/psicologia , Adolescente , Depressão/diagnóstico , Depressão/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , New York/epidemiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Fatores de Risco , Instituições Acadêmicas , População Urbana
4.
Acad Pediatr ; 15(6): 605-12, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26210908

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Premature infants are at high risk for respiratory disease, and secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure further increases their risk for developing respiratory illness and asthma. Yet, SHS exposure remains problematic in this vulnerable population. Our objective was to evaluate the effects of brief asthma education plus motivational interviewing counseling on reducing SHS exposure and improving respiratory outcomes in premature infants compared to asthma education alone. METHODS: Caregivers and their infants ≤32 weeks' gestational age were enrolled after discharge from a neonatal intensive care unit in Rochester, New York, from 2007 to 2011. Participants (N = 165, 61% Medicaid insurance, 35% Black, 19% Hispanic, 59% male) were stratified by infant SHS exposure and randomly assigned to treatment or comparison groups. RESULTS: Caregivers in the treatment group reported significantly more home smoking bans (96% vs 84%, P = .03) and reduced infant contact with smokers after the intervention (40% vs 58%, P = .03), but these differences did not persist long term. At study end (8 months after neonatal intensive care unit discharge), treatment group infants showed significantly greater reduction in salivary cotinine versus comparison (-1.32 ng/mL vs -1.08 ng/mL, P = .04), but no significant differences in other clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: A community-based intervention incorporating motivational interviewing and asthma education may be helpful in reducing SHS exposure of premature infants in the short term. Further efforts are needed to support sustained protections for this high-risk group and ultimately, prevent acute and chronic respiratory morbidity. Strategies for successfully engaging families during this stressful period warrant attention.


Assuntos
Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Entrevista Motivacional/métodos , Pais/educação , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Asma/prevenção & controle , Cotinina/metabolismo , Aconselhamento , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Masculino , Pais/psicologia , Alta do Paciente , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Doenças Respiratórias/prevenção & controle , Saliva/química , Fumar/terapia
5.
J Asthma ; 51(5): 522-9, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24494626

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Teens with persistent asthma do not always receive daily preventive medications or do not take them as prescribed, despite established clinical guidelines. The purpose of this study was to understand urban teens' experiences with asthma management, preventive medication adherence and participation in a school-based intervention. METHODS: Teens (12-15 years) with persistent asthma, and prescribed preventive medication, participated in a pilot study that included daily observed medication therapy at school and motivational interviewing. Semi-structured interviews occurred at final survey. Qualitative content analysis enabled data coding to identify themes. RESULTS: Themes were classified as "general asthma management" or "program-specific." For general management, routines were important, while hurrying interfered with taking medications. Forgetfulness was most commonly linked to medication nonadherence. Competing demands related to school preparedness and social priorities were barriers to medication use. Independence with medications was associated with several benefits (e.g. avoiding parental nagging and feeling responsible/mature). Program-specific experiences varied. Half of teens reported positive rapport with their school nurse, while a few felt that their nurse was dismissive. Unexpected benefits and barriers within the school structure included perceptions about leaving the classroom, the distance to the nurse's office, the necessity of hall passes and morning school routines. Importantly, many teens connected daily medication use with fewer asthma symptoms, incenting continued adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Teens with asthma benefit from adherence to preventive medications but encounter numerous barriers to proper use. Interventions to improve adherence must accommodate school demands and unique teen priorities. The school nurse's role as an ally may support teens' transition to medication independence.


Assuntos
Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde Escolar , Adolescente , Criança , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Projetos Piloto , Pesquisa Qualitativa , População Urbana
6.
Annu Rev Nurs Res ; 27: 297-318, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20192109

RESUMO

The prevalence of tobacco use and dependence among those with psychiatric and/or substance use disorders is exceptionally high, contributing to significant morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this review is to discuss the findings conducted by nurses regarding smoking and mental health. A search of the available literature since 1950 resulted in a review of 17 studies authored or coauthored by nurses. Most study designs were descriptive with only one investigator reporting the results of a small clinical trial. In addition to documenting smoking patterns in this population, investigators found that many psychiatric nurses assessed their clients for tobacco use and advised them to stop smoking but few intervened intensively to aid cessation. Psychiatric nurses reported low efficacy for delivering interventions and considerable doubt about their clients' abilities and motivation to stop smoking. Although some desired additional training in tobacco dependence interventions, nurses reported feeling ethically conflicted about, and were inconsistently supportive of, system level interventions such as tobacco free health care settings. It is likely that these findings, as well as the paucity of tobacco dependence studies, reflect the relatively small number of psychiatric nurses conducting research as well as the inattention, until recently, of mental health leaders, policy makers, and funders to the importance of tobacco dependence research in this clinical population. As tobacco dependence treatment for those with mental illnesses and/or addictive disorders becomes more of a public health priority, opportunities abound for nurse researchers to contribute to the growing evidence in this often neglected area.


Assuntos
Transtornos Mentais/enfermagem , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Tabagismo/prevenção & controle , Comorbidade , Humanos , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Pesquisa em Enfermagem , Enfermagem Psiquiátrica , Projetos de Pesquisa , Tabagismo/epidemiologia , Tabagismo/enfermagem
7.
J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc ; 15(6): 412-4, 2009 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21659256
8.
J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc ; 15(3): 172-81, 2009 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21665804

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Persons with mental illness smoke proportionately more cigarettes and die earlier than the general population. Yet compared with other clinicians, psychiatric professionals have intervened slowly with smoking patients. To assess psychiatric nurses' perspectives concerning tobacco dependence interventions, the American Psychiatric Nurses Association (APNA) Tobacco Dependence Task Force surveyed email-accessible APNA members (N = 1,365). OBJECTIVES: This paper reports survey results and implications for psychiatric nursing. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of a 29-item online survey conducted in early 2008. RESULTS: Most nurses asked if patients smoked but fewer advised against smoking, referred to cessation resources, or delivered intensive interventions. Nurses referred to resources if they felt motivated, knowledgeable, and/or confident in their skills and rated highly their patients' ability and/or motivation to quit smoking. Workplace characteristics were related to nurses' behaviors. Nursing curricula lack tobacco dependence content. CONCLUSIONS: Findings will guide efforts to support nurses in reducing/eliminating smoking by their patients through practice, education, research, and policy initiatives.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...