Scotland's "Incentivised Laparoscopy Practice" programme: Engaging trainees with take-home laparoscopy simulation.

BACKGROUND: The transfer validity of portable laparoscopy simulation is well established. However, attempts to integrate take-home simulation into surgical training have met with inconsistent engagement worldwide, as for example in our 2014-15 study of an Incentivised Laparoscopy Practice programme (ILPv1). Drawing on learning from our subsequent multi-centre study examining barriers and facilitators, we revised the programme for 2018 onwards. We now report on engagement with the 2018-2022 versions of this home-based simulation programme (ILP v2.1-2.3). METHODS: In ILP v2.1-2.3, three consecutive year-groups of new-start Core Surgical Trainees (n = 48, 46 and 53) were loaned portable simulators. The 6-month education programme included induction, technical support, and intermittent feedback. Six tasks were prescribed, with video instruction and charting of metric scores. Video uploads were required and scored by faculty. A pass resulted in an eCertificate, expected at Annual Review (but not mandatory for progression). ILP was set within a wider reform, "Improving Surgical Training". RESULTS: ILP v2.1-2.3 saw pass rates of 94%, 76% and 70% respectively (45/48, 35/46 and 37/53 trainees), compared with only 26% (7/27) in ILP v1, despite now including some trainees not intending careers in laparoscopic specialties. The ILP v2.2 group all reported their engagement with the whole simulation strategy was hampered by the COVID19 pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Simply providing take-home simulators, no matter how good, is not enough. To achieve trainee engagement, a whole programme is required, with motivated learners, individual and group practice, intermittent feedback, and clear goals and assessments. ILP is a complex intervention, best understood as a "reform within a reform, within a context."

A prospective cohort study of the safety of breast cancer surgery during COVID-19 pandemic in the West of Scotland.

INTRODUCTION: In order to minimise the risk of breast cancer patients for COVID-19 infection related morbidity and mortality prioritisation of care has utmost importance since the onset of the pandemic. However, COVID-19 related risk in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery has not been studied yet. We evaluated the safety of breast cancer surgery during COVID-19 pandemic in the West of Scotland region. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of patients having breast cancer surgery was carried out in a geographical region during the first eight weeks of the hospital lockdown and outcomes were compared to the regional cancer registry data of pre-COVID-19 patients of the same units (n = 1415). RESULTS: 188 operations were carried out in 179 patients. Tumour size was significantly larger in patients undergoing surgery during hospital lockdown than before (cT3-4: 16.8% vs. 7.4%; p < 0.001; pT2 - pT4: 45.5% vs. 35.6%; p = 0.002). ER negative and HER-2 positive rate was significantly higher during lockdown (ER negative: 41.3% vs. 17%, p < 0.001; HER-2 positive: 23.4% vs. 14.8%; p = 0.004). While breast conservation rate was lower during lockdown (58.6% vs. 65%; p < 0.001), level II oncoplastic conservation was significantly higher in order to reduce mastectomy rate (22.8% vs. 5.6%; p < 0.001). No immediate reconstruction was offered during lockdown. 51.2% had co-morbidity, and 7.8% developed postoperative complications in lockdown. There was no peri-operative COVID-19 infection related morbidity or mortality. CONCLUSION: breast cancer can be safely provided during COVID-19 pandemic in selected patients.

Eight Years of Scottish Surgical Boot Camps: How We Do It Now.

BACKGROUND: Scottish Surgical Boot Camps are the induction course for new start Core Surgical Trainees (Residents) in Scotland. The aim is to capitalise on trainees' receptiveness at a time of transition, and to give them a safe and "flying start." At their inception, these were the first such courses in the UK to integrate technical and non-technical skills training. As well as knowledge and skills, trainees have learned norms and expectations of a community of professional practice. METHODS: Over 9 consecutive years of delivery and quality improvement, faculty have learned much about the safe use of simulation, as an adjuvant training modality for a range of competences required in the operating room, the clinic/office, the wards and other clinical domains. CONCLUSION: In this paper we describe the development and content of the course, discuss the importance of the whole "activity system," and present some evaluation data. We give tips for success, such as using simulations of escalating complexity, and the power of seemingly incidental Learning Outcomes.

The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in planning adjuvant therapy for elderly women with low-risk breast cancer.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) guides adjuvant therapy in breast cancer. There is controversy regarding its use in elderly women with low-risk breast cancer. This study aimed to determine whether a positive SLNB in this group affected the decision to offer adjuvant therapy compared with younger patients. This retrospective review included 492 patients, 89 of whom had a positive SLNB. Elderly, node-positive women were significantly less likely to receive chemotherapy than their younger counterparts (P < .0001), suggesting the use of SLNB in the elderly could be rationalized.

Use of head camera-cued recall and debrief to externalise expertise: a systematic review of literature from multiple fields of practice.

Background: The study of decision making in complex naturalistic environments poses several challenges. In response to these, video-stimulated cued-recall-debrief was developed. It involves an individual wearing a head-mounted camera which records a task from their point of view. Afterwards, footage captured is reviewed along with a facilitated debrief to help externalise cognitive processes. In theory, motion, audio and visual cues generate a high level of experiential immersion which helps the expert to articulate previously hidden thoughts and actions. Objective: To examine the current evidence for video-stimulated cued-recall-debrief as a means of explicating expert thoughts and feelings in complex tasks in a range of environments. Study selection: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Education Resources Information Center, SPORTDiscus, PsycINFO and Google Scholar were searched for articles containing the key terms 'cued-recall (debrief)', 'decision making', 'skills' and 'video recording'. Studies were included if they examined the following outcomes: (1) feasibility, (2) extent of experiential immersion, (3) ability to generate unique insight into decision-making processes and (4) current applications. 1831 articles were identified initially, and 9 studies were included in the final review. Findings: Video-stimulated cued-recall-debrief is associated with a high level of experiential immersion and generates between two and four times the number of recollections compared with free recall. It can be used to build models of cognitive activity and to characterise the way in which more and less skilled individuals tend to think and feel. Conclusions: The technique could be used to explicate expertise within medicine: these insights into performance could be used as a training tool for other practitioners. Trial registration number: CRD42017057484.

Barriers and facilitators to deliberate practice using take-home laparoscopic simulators.

BACKGROUND: Several regions in the UK and Ireland have delivered home-based laparoscopic simulation programmes in an attempt to progress surgical trainees' skills through deliberate practice. However, engagement with these programmes has been poor. This study aims to uncover the barriers to engagement with home-based simulation, with a view to developing an improved programme. METHODS: This was a qualitative study using focus groups with key stakeholders including junior surgical trainees, consultants/attendings and simulation faculty. Data were collected across four regions in three countries. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed and a thematic analysis was performed using NVivo software. RESULTS: Sixty-three individuals were interviewed in 12 focus groups (43 trainees, 20 trainers). Trainees cited competing commitments as a barrier to engaging with home-based simulation. They tended to focus on scoring 'points' towards career progression rather than viewing tasks as interesting, or associated with personal development. Their view was that this approach is perpetuated by the training system, which rewards trainees for publications and exams, but not for operative skill. Trainees were unsatisfied with metric feedback and wanted individual feedback from consultants (attendings). Trainees perceived consultants as lacking interest in the programmes and training in general. However, some consultants were unaware of the programmes being delivered and others felt lacking in confidence to deliver the necessary training. CONCLUSIONS: Scheduled simulation sessions which provide trainees with the opportunity for consultant feedback may improve engagement. Tackling the 'point-scoring' culture is more challenging. This could be addressed by modified assessment structures, greater recognition and accountability for trainers, and recognition and funding of simulation strategies including in-house skills sessions.

Early experience of a virtual journal club.

BACKGROUND: Traditional journal club models based on didactic presentation sessions followed by group discussion have many limitations. To overcome some of these shortcomings, a virtual journal club (VJC) using social media and e-mail was developed. The aim of this study was to report the initial experience of this novel multimodal e-learning platform to facilitate journal club discussion and promote the development of critical appraisal skills. METHODS: Journal articles were discussed monthly via e-mail and social media. After a 3-week period of discussion, all comments were collated and group-generated critical appraisal summaries were fed back to participants. In addition, letters to the journal editors based on the group appraisal were submitted. A questionnaire survey to evaluate the VJC concept was also conducted. FINDINGS: After eight cycles of the VJC, the mean trainee participation rate was 29.6 per cent (range 21.1-42.1%). Senior trainees (≥4 years of postgraduate experience) were more likely to participate than more junior trainees (75.0 versus 21.1%; p = 0.005). The majority of participants thought that the VJC was educationally valuable, easy to participate in, helpful in keeping up to date with recent papers and useful in developing critical appraisal skills. Barriers to participation were lack of time, motivation and lack of experience in critical appraisal. In addition, the group-generated critical appraisal summaries derived from VJC discussions led to eight published 'letters to the editor'. Traditional journal club models based on didactic presentation sessions followed by group discussion have many limitations CONCLUSION: This novel VJC model is a feasible and popular method of delivering a journal club in the postgraduate setting.

The role of surgical lung biopsy in the management of interstitial lung disease: experience from a single institution in the UK.

OBJECTIVES: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) includes a wide spectrum of pulmonary pathologies. The role of surgical lung biopsy (SLB) in the diagnosis of ILD is still controversial. The purpose of this study was to ascertain whether SLB is worthwhile in the management of ILD. METHODS: One hundred and three patients underwent SLB for ILD from April 2008 to March 2010 at a single institution. Outcomes included patient demographics, preoperative investigations, preoperative diagnosis and treatment, surgical approach, number and site of biopsies, complications, length of postoperative stay and postoperative pathological diagnosis and treatment. RESULTS: Fifty-one (49.6%) patients were male and 52 (50.4%) were female. The median age was 58 (range 26-78). Major complications were seen in 7 patients (6.8%). Five patients (4.9%) died within 30 days following surgery. Definitive pathological diagnosis (DPD) was reached in 72 (69.9%) patients, whereas no DPD was achieved in 31 (30.1%). Within the group of patients who received DPD, this differed from the clinical diagnosis in 53 patients (51.5%), and was concordant in 19 (18.4%). The DPD was helpful in guiding the management of 47 patients (45.6%), who had a change in their treatment following the procedure. The median hospital stay was 4 days (range 2-42 days). CONCLUSIONS: SLB is a well-recognized procedure. Although it provides a diagnosis for the majority of patients, in our series SLB was inconclusive in a considerable number of cases and did not lead to a therapeutic change for more than half of all patients. Furthermore, SLB is not without risk and can be associated with a prolonged hospital stay. We believe that SLB should be performed in a select group of patients with ILD after discussion by a multidisciplinary panel.