Pelvic tilt affects superolateral coverage, but not superomedial coverage of the femoral head following periacetabular osteotomy.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic tilt is an important sagittal parameter that varies greatly among individuals. The objective of this study was to quantify the effect of pelvic tilt on femoral head coverage and range of motion in a dysplastic population following periacetabular osteotomy. METHODS: Twenty-three dysplastic hips from 19 patients (17 female, 2 male) were included in this study. Three-dimensional models were reconstructed using pre-operative CT images, and patient-specific neutral pelvic tilt was obtained on an anteroposterior X-ray. Following a simulated periacetabular osteotomy, the pelvic tilt was changed from -15° to +15°, and the effects on femoral head coverage and hip range of motion was quantified using a customized MATLAB program. FINDINGS: Pelvic tilt did not significantly affect total femoral head coverage (P > 0.2). However, a 15° anterior tilt from neutral resulted in a 17.72 ± 9.45% increase in anterolateral coverage and a 23.96 ± 7.48% decrease in posterolateral coverage (P < 0.0001), as well as an 18.2 ± 8.4° loss of internal rotation at 90° of hip flexion. Contrarily, posterior pelvic tilt led to a 26.79 ± 9.04% reduction in anterolateral coverage (P < 0.0001) and an 18.02 ± 9.57% increase in posterolateral coverage (P < 0.0001), and the maximum internal rotation increased 11.8 ± 3.7°. INTERPRETATION: While pelvic tilt did not affect total femoral head coverage, it had a significant impact on the distribution of coverage within the superolateral region of the femoral head. Anterior pelvic tilt led to increased anterolateral coverage, but also had a negative impact on hip range of motion. An optimal surgical plan should achieve adequate coverage while not significantly limiting the patient's mobility.

Time Matters: Knee Cartilage Defect Expansion and High-Grade Lesion Formation while Awaiting Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess potential risk factors, including time delay until implantation, for knee cartilage defect expansion or new high-grade defect formation between biopsy and Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation (ACI) or Matrix Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation (MACI). STUDY DESIGN: Consecutive knee ACI and MACI cases by a single surgeon (n = 111) were reviewed. The relationship between time between biopsy and staged implantation and (1) progression in primary cartilage defect size and (2) development of a new high-grade (Outerbridge grade ≥3) cartilage defect were determined with adjustment for demographics, body mass index, smoking status, coronal alignment, initial cartilage status, and prior surgery. RESULTS: Average size of the primary defect at time of biopsy was 4.50 cm2. Mean time to chondrocyte implantation was 155 days. Defect expansion increased 0.11 cm2 (standard error = 0.03) per month delay to implantation (P = 0.001). Independent predictors of defect expansion were male sex, smaller initial defect size, and delay to implantation (adjusted mean = 0.15 cm2 expansion per month). A total of 16.2% of patients (n = 18/111) developed a new high-grade defect. Independent predictors of a new secondary defect were Outerbridge grade 2 changes (vs. 0-1) on the surface opposing the index defect and delayed implantation (per month increase, adjusted odds ratio = 1.21, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.44; P = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing 2-stage cell-based cartilage restoration with either ACI or MACI demonstrated long delays between stages of surgery, placing them at risk for expanding defects and development of new high-grade cartilage defects. Patients who were male, had smaller initial defect size, and longer time between surgeries were at greater risk for defect expansion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective comparative study.

A Comparative Analysis of the Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Femoral Nerve and Fascia Iliaca Blocks in Hip Arthroscopy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of the single-shot quadratus lumborum (QL) block versus femoral nerve and fascia iliacus (F/FI) blocks performed preoperatively on perioperative opioid requirements, subjective pain scores, and time to discharge. METHODS: Patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement and had a preoperative nerve block between January 2017 and August 2019 at our institution were identified. Patients were separated into 2 groups: those who either received a preoperative single-shot QL block or a preoperative single-shot F/FI block. All patients received general anesthesia. Intraoperative, postanesthesia care unit (PACU), and total morphine equivalents were analyzed using unpaired t test. Secondary outcome measures including total time in PACU and block-related complications were recorded and analyzed as well. RESULTS: One hundred one patients were retrospectively reviewed. Forty-three patients received preoperative QL blocks, and 58 patients received preoperative F/FI blocks. Demographics and operative characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Patients receiving a QL block required significantly lower total morphine equivalents (63.1 vs 87.0, P < .001). Patients receiving a QL block also had shorter PACU stays (116 vs 148 minutes, P < .001) and lower subjective pain scores at the time of discharge (3.27 vs 4.98, P < .001) compared with the F/FI block group. There were also significant decreases in the number of intraoperative opioids (42.1 vs 58.4, P < .001) and PACU opioids (20.7 vs 28.7, P = .03) used when analyzed separately. Two patients in the femoral nerve block group had noted a fall postoperatively while the block was in effect. No patients in the QL block group had a block-related complication. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving a preoperative QL block for hip arthroscopy demonstrated lower total opioid requirements, shorter PACU stay, and lower pain scores at discharge than patients receiving preoperative F/FI blocks with no reported adverse events. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative trial.

Subjective Knee Function and Risk of Failure Are Equivalent for Men and Women at 5 Years After Meniscus Repair.

PURPOSE: To determine whether subjective knee function or risk of repair failure differ between men and women at mean 5 years following meniscal repair with or without concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. METHODS: A total of 235 patients (97 women, 138 men; mean age, 29.1 years; standard deviation, 11.3) were assessed for meniscus repair failure and postoperative knee function at mean 5.8 years follow-up. Knee symptoms were assessed with International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective (IKDC-S) scores. Postoperative activity scores were assessed with Marx activity score. Independent effects of patient age and activity level on meniscus failure risk and patient-reported outcomes were determined by multivariate analysis with adjustment for age, body mass index, anterior cruciate ligament status, tear pattern, and number of implants used at the time of surgery. RESULTS: Failures occurred in 18.9% of men and 21.0% of women with no difference in mean time to failure (P = .75) or risk of failure for men vs women (P = .57) in the univariate analysis. Male sex was not an independent risk factor for failure after adjustment for patient age, body mass index, concomitant anterior cruciate ligament status, tear pattern, or number of implants used (P = .16). Marx activity scores at follow-up were higher among men in multivariate analysis (P = .009). Men and women had similar IKDC-S scores at follow-up in the unadjusted (P = .25) and multivariate analyses (P = .21). CONCLUSIONS: Following meniscus repair, both sexes report similar subjective knee function, though men have higher self-reported activity scores. Meniscus repair failure risk does not differ between men or women at mid-term follow up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective case-control study.

Meniscus repair five-year results are influenced by patient pre-injury activity level but not age group.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study is to determine whether patient age group (≥40 years versus <40 years) and pre-injury activity level are independently predictive of symptomatic failure rates and patient-reported outcomes after meniscus repair with or without concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) at mean five years of follow-up. METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-five patients (n = 61, age ≥40 years; n = 164, age <40; 11% sedentary, 63% recreational athletes, 26% competitive athletes; 72% cutting-pivoting sports, 28% non-cutting or non-pivoting sports) who underwent meniscal repair were assessed for symptomatic failure and subjective knee function at mean 5.4 years of follow-up. Symptoms were assessed with Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective (IKDC-S) scores. RESULTS: Repair failure was 20% overall with no association with age group (<40 vs. ≥40 years) or level of activity. When compared with sedentary patients, IKDC-S scores were not associated with age group but were lower among sedentary patients (mean: 59.6, SE: 4.9) compared with recreational (mean: 78.9, SE: 2.5; p = 0.007) or competitive athletes (mean: 79.2, SE: 3.8; p = 0.02). KOOS-ADL scores were independently associated with age and were higher among patients <40 years. KOOS-pain, KOOS-sport, or KOOS-QOL were not associated with age group. Sedentary status was independently associated with lower KOOS scores for all sub-scores. CONCLUSIONS: Meniscal repair failure rates and patient-reported outcomes do not differ substantially between older or younger patients of similar pre-injury activity level. Sedentary patients regardless of age have worse self-reported subjective outcomes compared with active patients.

Treatment of Extensor Tendon Disruption After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Patellar or quadriceps tendon ruptures after total knee arthroplasty constitute a devastating complication with historically poor outcomes. With advances in soft tissue reconstruction and repair techniques, treatment has become more nuanced. Numerous graft options for reconstruction and suture techniques for repair have been described but there is no consensus regarding optimal treatment. METHODS: A search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus was conducted. Articles meeting inclusion criteria were reviewed. Type of intervention performed, type of injury studied, outcome measures, and complications were recorded. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed. RESULTS: Twenty-eight articles met inclusion criteria. The complication rate after repair of patellar tendon (63.16%) was higher than the complication rate after repair of quadriceps tendon (25.37%). However, the complication rate for patellar and quadriceps tendon tears after autograft, allograft, or mesh reconstruction was similar (18.8% vs 19.2%, respectively). The most common complication after extensor mechanism repair or reconstruction was extension lag of 30° or greater (45.33%). This was followed by re-rupture and infection (25.33% and 22.67%, respectively). Early ruptures had a higher overall complication rate than late injuries. CONCLUSION: Extensor mechanism disruption after total knee arthroplasty is a complication with high morbidity. Reconstruction of patellar tendon rupture has a much lower complication rate than repair. Our findings support the recommendation of patellar tendon reconstruction in both the early and late presentation stages. Quadriceps rupture can be treated with repair in early ruptures or with reconstruction in the late rupture or in the case of revision surgery.

Smoking increases the risk of early meniscus repair failure.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study is to determine whether patients who smoke cigarettes at the time of surgery are at significantly increased risk of early meniscus repair failure relative to non-smokers. METHODS: Retrospective chart review identified 64 current smokers within a series of 444 consecutive patients who underwent meniscus repair during a 7 years period. Fifty-two of these 64 smokers were available for follow-up and were matched by age, sex, and ACL status with non-smokers from the same cohort. Records of these 104 patients with a total of 120 meniscus repairs were reviewed to identify meniscus repair failure (defined as repeat surgery on the index meniscus) during the median 13-month (range: 3-79 months) follow-up period. RESULTS: The smoking and non-smoking groups were similar in age, sex, ACL status, BMI, meniscus repair technique, and meniscus involved. Meniscus repair failure occurred in 19 of the 112 menisci in 104 patients, for an overall failure risk of 17 %. Of the 19 failures, 14 occurred in 79 repaired medial menisci (18 % failure risk) and 5 occurred in 33 repaired lateral menisci (15 % failure risk). Meniscus repair failure occurred in significantly more smokers (15 failures in 56 menisci in 52 patients -27 % failure risk) than non-smokers (4 failures in 56 menisci in 52 patients -7 % failure risk) (p = 0.0076). CONCLUSIONS: Smoking is associated with significantly increased risk of early meniscus repair failure as defined by the incidence of repeat surgery on the index meniscus. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

The Relationship between Body Mass Index and Risk of Failure following Meniscus Repair.

It is unknown whether body mass index (BMI) influences outcomes of meniscus repair. We hypothesized that increased BMI would be associated with increased risk of failure. A retrospective study was performed involving patients who had undergone meniscus repair between 2008 and 2012. Chart review and phone interviews were conducted to determine which patients required additional surgery. Patients were categorized as normal BMI (<25) or increased BMI (≥25). Of the 305 patients who met study criteria, 216 (70.8%) were available for follow-up at a mean of 19 months postoperatively. A total of 100 patients (46.3%) had a BMI <25 and 116 (53.7%) patients had a BMI ≥25. BMI was less than 35 in 90% of patients. Thirty-four patients (15.7%) required further surgery for a repair failure. Failure occurred in 20 patients (20%) in the normal BMI group and 14 patients (12%) in the increased BMI group (p = 0.14). Logistic regression revealed a trend toward decreased odds of repair failure in the increased BMI group (odds ratio: 0.46; 95% confidence interval: 0.20-1.05; p = 0.065). Patients with a BMI ≥25 did not have a higher risk of meniscus repair failure relative to those with a BMI <25. Given these findings, surgeons should not consider moderately increased BMI as a contraindication to meniscal repair. The effect of BMI greater than 35 on outcomes of meniscal repair remains unclear and warrants further study.