RESUMO
Introducción: Bartonella henselae causa la enfermedad por arañazo de gato (EAG), transmitida por arañazo o mordedura de gato, su principal reservorio. En ocasiones produce neuritis óptica o neurorretinitis.Objetivo: Revisar estas dolencias en Gipuzkoa (España), 2014-2019. Métodos: Revisión retrospectiva de registros serológicos y clínicos, seleccionando aquellos con manifestaciones clínicas compatibles, contacto con gatos y serología positiva para B. henselae (IFI-IgG≥1/256). Resultados: Sesenta y cuatro pacientes presentaron EAG; entre estos, uno tenía neuritis óptica y 3, neurorretinitis (4/64, 6,3%). En 3 casos un cuadro pseudogripal precedió a los síntomas oculares; 2 presentaron pérdida de agudeza visual al alta, a pesar del tratamiento prolongado con antibióticos y corticoides. Conclusión: La neuritis óptica y la neurorretinitis por B. henselae son complicaciones graves que presentan una incidencia no despreciable entre los pacientes con EAG de Gipuzkoa. Recomendamos descartar la EAG en pacientes con síntomas de neuritis óptica o neurorretinitis (pérdida brusca de visión, etc.) y contacto con gatos.(AU)
Introduction: Bartonella henselae causes cat scratch disease (CSD), spread by a cat scratch or bite. Cats are its main reservoir. This sometimes results in optic neuritis or neuroretinitis. Objective: To review these conditions in Gipuzkoa (Spain), 2014-2019. Methods: A retrospective review of serology and clinical records, selecting those with consistent clinical signs, contact with cats and positive serology for B. henselae (IgG-IFA≥1/256). Results: Sixty-four patients had CSD. Of these, one had optic neuritis and 3 had neuroretinitis (4/64; 6.3%). In 3 patients, flu-like symptoms preceded eye symptoms. Two suffered from loss of visual acuity at discharge, despite prolonged treatment with antibiotics and corticosteroids. Conclusion: Optic neuritis and neuroretinitis caused by B. henselae are severe complications with a non-negligible incidence among patients with CSD in Gipuzkoa. We recommend ruling out CSD in patients with symptoms of optic neuritis or neuroretinitis (sudden vision loss, etc.) and contact with cats.(AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Bartonella henselae , Doença da Arranhadura de Gato , Neurite Óptica , Espanha , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doenças TransmissíveisRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Bartonella henselae causes cat scratch disease (CSD), spread by a cat scratch or bite. Cats are its main reservoir. This sometimes results in optic neuritis or neuroretinitis. OBJECTIVE: To review these conditions in Gipuzkoa (Spain), 2014-2019. METHODS: A retrospective review of serology registries and clinical registries, selecting those with consistent clinical signs, contact with cats and positive serology for B. henselae (IgG-IFA ≥1/256). RESULTS: Sixty-four patients had CSD. Of these, one had optic neuritis and 3 had neuroretinitis (4/64; 6.3%). In 3 patients, flu-like symptoms preceded eye symptoms. Two suffered from loss of visual acuity at discharge, despite prolonged treatment with antibiotics and corticosteroids. CONCLUSION: Optic neuritis and neuroretinitis caused by B. henselae are severe complications with a non-negligible incidence among patients with CSD in Gipuzkoa. We recommend ruling out CSD in patients with symptoms of optic neuritis or neuroretinitis (sudden vision loss, etc.) and contact with cats.
Assuntos
Bartonella henselae , Doença da Arranhadura de Gato , Coriorretinite , Retinite , Doença da Arranhadura de Gato/diagnóstico , Humanos , Retinite/diagnóstico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Bartonella henselae causes cat scratch disease (CSD), spread by a cat scratch or bite. Cats are its main reservoir. This sometimes results in optic neuritis or neuroretinitis. OBJECTIVE: To review these conditions in Gipuzkoa (Spain), 2014-2019. METHODS: A retrospective review of serology and clinical records, selecting those with consistent clinical signs, contact with cats and positive serology for B. henselae (IgG-IFA≥1/256). RESULTS: Sixty-four patients had CSD. Of these, one had optic neuritis and 3 had neuroretinitis (4/64; 6.3%). In 3 patients, flu-like symptoms preceded eye symptoms. Two suffered from loss of visual acuity at discharge, despite prolonged treatment with antibiotics and corticosteroids. CONCLUSION: Optic neuritis and neuroretinitis caused by B. henselae are severe complications with a non-negligible incidence among patients with CSD in Gipuzkoa. We recommend ruling out CSD in patients with symptoms of optic neuritis or neuroretinitis (sudden vision loss, etc.) and contact with cats.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To study the drug retention rate (DRR), causes, and predictors of discontinuation of adalimumab (ADA) in a real-world uveitis setting. DESIGN: Multicentric, nationwide, registry-based, ambispective, observational study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients treated with ADA for noninfectious uveitis (NIU) in the Biotherapies for Uveitis (BioÚvea) Spanish registry from November 2016 to November 2017. METHODS: Demographics, clinical data, timing, and reasons for discontinuation, if occurred, were recorded. The DRR and drug retention time (DRT) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Median follow-up was analyzed by reverse Kaplan-Meier. Log-rank test was used for comparisons. Cox proportional-hazards model (PHM) and propensity score matching were used to identify predictors for discontinuation due to inefficacy and adverse events. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Drug retention rate and DRT. RESULTS: A total of 392 patients were analyzed, including 218 women. Median age was 39 (interquartile range, 25) years. Nonanterior uveitis was recorded in 242 patients. Median follow-up was 49.07 (0.97-131.67) months, median DRT (survival) was 69.3 months, and 14 patients were lost to follow-up. The DRR at 6, 12, 24, and 60 months was 92.97%, 87.68%, 76.31%, and 54.28%, respectively. Adalimumab was discontinued in 151 patients. Discontinuation was due to lack or loss of efficacy in 74 patients, adverse event in 34 patients, and sustained quiescence in 25 patients. Recorded adverse events included infections in 10 patients and malignant neoplasms in 3 patients. Concurrent classic immunomodulatory therapy (IMT) was given to 251 patients. We did not find DRT differences regarding the use of concurrent IMT. Adalimumab was prescribed as a second or greater biotherapy line in 76 patients who showed shorter DRT (P = 0.038). Starting ADA in nonbiotherapy-naive patients was a predictor for "discontinuation due to inefficacy," whereas undifferentiated uveitis was a predictor for "discontinuation due to adverse event." Drug retention time was significantly shorter when spared or intensified, mainly due to discontinuation after sustained quiescence. CONCLUSIONS: Drug retention rate of ADA in uveitis at 60 months was 54.28%, with a good safety profile. The use of concurrent IMT did not show a significant influence on DRT. The use of ADA as a second or further biotherapy could be predictive for discontinuation due to inefficacy. Undifferentiated uveitis may be prone to premature discontinuation of ADA due to adverse events.
