RESUMO
Purpose: To present an uncommon cause of intermittent angle closure in a young adult patient presenting with intermittent headache and blurry vision exacerbated by accommodation. Observations: A 37-year-old man reported experiencing intermittent blurry vision, headache, and pain in both eyes associated with prolonged periods of reading beginning at age 17. Serial intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements showed an increase in IOP from 14 to 32 mmHg in the right eye and from 9 to 37 mmHg in the left eye after 145 minutes of sustained accommodation while sitting up. IOP did not normalize after laser peripheral iridotomy but did normalize after clear lens extraction. Conclusions and importance: This case characterized a rare presentation of accommodation-induced IOP elevation in a young adult male that resolved only after clear lens extraction. The clinical takeaway was the importance of considering accommodation-associated angle closure in patients presenting with high intraocular pressures, eye strain, and/or headache with accommodative activities. Notable symptoms that should raise suspicion for this syndrome include halos, changes in visual acuity, and headache with accommodation. We suggested that patients presenting with these symptoms be followed closely, with a full glaucoma evaluation including gonioscopy and possible ultrasound biomicroscopy to assess for pediatric eversional angle closure with headache, plateau iris, angle closure glaucoma, and lens-induced angle closure.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Approximately one in four women veterans accessing the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) engage in unhealthy alcohol use. There is substantial evidence for gender-sensitive screening (AUDIT-C = 3) and brief intervention (BI) to reduce risks associated with unhealthy alcohol use in women veterans; however, VA policies and incentives remain gender-neutral (AUDIT-C = 5). Women veterans who screen positive at lower-risk-level alcohol use (AUDIT-C = 3 or 4) may screen out and therefore not receive BI. This study aimed to examine gaps in implementation of BI practice for women veterans through identifying rates of BI at different alcohol risk levels (AUDIT-C = 3-4; =5-7; =8-12), and the role of alcohol risk level and other factors in predicting receipt of BI. METHODS: From administrative data (2010-2016), we drew a sample of women veterans returning from recent wars who accessed outpatient and/or inpatient care. Of 869 women veterans, 284 screened positive for unhealthy alcohol use at or above a gender-sensitive cut-point (AUDIT-C ≥ 3). We used chart review methods to abstract variables from the medical record and then employed logistic regression comparing women veterans who received BI at varying alcohol risk levels to those who did not. RESULTS: While almost 60% of the alcohol positive-risk sample received BI, among the subset of women veterans who screened positive for lower-risk alcohol use (57%; AUDIT-C = 3 or 4) only 34% received BI. Nurses in primary care programs were less likely to deliver BI than other types of clinicians (e.g., physicians, psychologists, social workers) in mental health programs; further, nurses in women's health programs were less likely to deliver BI than other types of clinicians in mixed-gender programs; Those women veterans with more medical problems were no more likely to receive BI than those with fewer medical problems. CONCLUSIONS: Given that women veterans are a rapidly growing veteran population and a VA priority, underuse of BI for women veterans screening positive at a lower-risk level and those with more medical comorbidities requires attention, as do potential gaps in service delivery of BI in primary care and women's health programs. Women veterans health and well-being may be improved by tailoring screening for a younger cohort of women veterans at high-risk for, or with co-occurring disorders and then training providers in best practices for BI implementation.
