Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 49(5): 468-75, 1991 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1902253

RESUMO

Two ultralight general anesthetic techniques, one using low-dose ketamine and the other using methohexital as the primary anesthetic agent, were compared for efficacy, safety, and psychomotor recovery in a double-blind fashion for use during third molar surgery. Low-dose intravenous ketamine as the primary anesthetic following premedication with fentanyl and midazolam, and in conjunction with nitrous oxide, appeared to produce less hypoxia, hypercarbia, and apnea than when methohexital was used. No significant differences were noted in heart rate or blood pressure between the techniques. The ketamine technique was universally preferred by the surgeons and anesthesiologists because of superior patient cooperation and airway management. No unpleasant psychomimetic side effects of significance were noted with the use of ketamine. Postoperative recovery took slightly longer in the ketamine group, with patients being judged fit for discharge approximately 10 to 15 minutes later than the patients who received methohexital.


Assuntos
Anestesia Dentária , Ketamina , Metoexital , Extração Dentária , Adolescente , Adulto , Amnésia/induzido quimicamente , Anestesia Dentária/efeitos adversos , Apneia/epidemiologia , Dióxido de Carbono/fisiologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Fentanila/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Incidência , Injeções Intravenosas , Masculino , Midazolam/uso terapêutico , Oxiemoglobinas/análise , Cooperação do Paciente , Pré-Medicação , Estudos Prospectivos , Volume de Ventilação Pulmonar/fisiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...