Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am Surg ; 71(12): 1042-6, 2005 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16447476

RESUMO

In 2002, Ochsner laparoscopic surgeons and nephrologists began placing peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheters via a laparoscopic-assisted method. We compared laparoscopically placed PD catheters (LAPD) with catheters most recently placed without laparoscopic aid (STPD). The method for this study is a retrospective chart review. Demographics of both groups were similar. Nine of 20 (45%) in the STPD group and 16 of 23 (70%) in the LAPD group had had previous abdominal surgery. Three of 20 (15%) of STPD had complications, including one small bowel injury. Four of 23 (17.4%) of the LAPD had complications. One of 20 (5%) in the STPD group and 3 of 23 (13%) in the LAPD group had dialysate leaks. In the STPD group, 8 of 20 (40%) had catheter problems that led to removal in 7 (35%). In the LAPD group, 6 of 23 (26%) had catheter malfunction: 3 were salvaged with a laparoscopic procedure; 3 (13%) were removed for malfunction. 1) LAPD allows proper PD placement after complex abdominal surgery; 2) Although dialysate leak complications are increased, bowel perforation risk is less; 3) Because of proper placement, PD catheter malfunction rate is less with LAPD; 4) Although no results obtained statistical significance, we found LAPD superior to STPD and have converted to this technique.


Assuntos
Cateteres de Demora , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Diálise Peritoneal Ambulatorial Contínua/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Segurança de Equipamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Diálise Peritoneal Ambulatorial Contínua/instrumentação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
2.
Am J Surg ; 184(4): 341-5, 2002 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12383897

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: When lymphazurin became unavailable to our institution, we elected to employ methylene blue to perform sentinel node mapping for patients with breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to compare methylene blue and lymphazurin for performing sentinel node mapping for breast cancer. METHODS: We evaluated our sentinel node mapping experience from April 1, 2001 to March 31, 2002. Patients were divided into two groups based on the dye used for lymphatic mapping. The two groups were compared to evaluate the results of the sentinel node mapping procedure. RESULTS: During the study period a total of 199 patients were evaluated with sentinel node mapping, 87 with lymphazurin and 112 with methylene blue. The two groups were similar in demonstrating the success of the sentinel node procedure, nodes identified per case, and technique used for node identification (colloid or dye, or both). CONCLUSIONS: In our initial experience, methylene blue appears to be equivalent to lymphazurin for sentinel node mapping in breast cancer.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Corantes , Linfonodos/patologia , Azul de Metileno , Corantes de Rosanilina , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/métodos , Axila , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...