A new surgical concept for the efficient treatment of large and deep burns.

Effective burn surgery is based on two fundamental principles: prompt excision of necrotic tissue and definitive coverage preserving functional dermis and body contour. There is often compromise, either prioritizing the urgency of excision or opting for patient stability and optimal conditions prior to autografting. We propose a surgical concept that addresses this critical treatment gap. In 2022 we implemented a new three-phase protocol, EDM: (Excision phase, E) Immediate excision of the burn wound preserving body contour; (Dermis phase, D) definitive temporization of the wound bed, using Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix (BTM), to prepare it for successful grafting. (Meek phase, M): Upon complete dermal temporization, full autologous coverage in a single micrografting procedure. We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study to characterize the EDM protocol compared to the prior standard of care (>40%TBSA, n=5 in EDM vs. n=10 matched controls). Primary outcomes were total surgeries required, total surgeries to achieve>90% healing, uninterrupted recovery time without surgery, and time on mechanical ventilation. The EDM group required fewer surgeries in total (5 vs. 9.5 ; p=0.01) and to achieve>90% healing (3 vs. 6.5; p=0.001). EDM patients experienced longer uninterrupted recovery (24 vs. 14 days, p=0.001). Additionally, EDM patients spent less time on mechanical ventilation (210 vs. 1136 hours, p=0.005). The EDM protocol could improve surgical efficiency, ultimately having the potential to expedite rehabilitation in severely burned patients. The study underscores the potential of combining fundamentals of burn surgery, with innovative surgical techniques and materials, in order to bridge the gap between excision and grafting.

Administration and effects of beta blockers and oxandrolone in severely burned adults: a post hoc analysis of the RE-ENERGIZE trial.

Background: Prospective randomized trials in severely burned children have shown the positive effects of oxandrolone (OX), beta blockers (BB) and a combination of the two (BBOX) on hypermetabolism, catabolism and hyperinflammation short- and long-term post-burn. Although data on severely burned adults are lacking in comparison, BB, OX and BBOX appear to be commonly employed in this patient population. In this study, we perform a secondary analysis of an international prospective randomized trial dataset to provide descriptive evidence regarding the current utilization patterns and potential treatment effects of OX, BB and BBOX. Methods: The RE-ENERGIZE (RandomizEd Trial of ENtERal Glutamine to minimIZE Thermal Injury, NCT00985205) trial included 1200 adult patients with severe burns. We stratified patients according to their receipt of OX, BB, BBOX or none of these drugs (None) during acute hospitalization. Descriptive statistics describe the details of drug therapy and unadjusted analyses identify predisposing factors for drug use per group. Association between OX, BB and BBOX and clinical outcomes such as time to discharge alive and 6-month mortality were modeled using adjusted multivariable Cox regressions. Results: More than half of all patients in the trial received either OX (n = 138), BB (n = 293) or BBOX (n = 282), as opposed to None (n = 487, 40.6%). Per study site and geographical region, use of OX, BB and BBOX was highly variable. Predisposing factors for the use of OX, BB and BBOX included larger total body surface area (TBSA) burned, higher acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II scores on admission and younger patient age. After adjustment for multiple covariates, the use of OX was associated with a longer time to discharge alive [hazard ratio (HR) 0.62, confidence interval (CI) (0.47-0.82) per 100% increase, p = 0.001]. A higher proportion of days on BB was associated with lower in-hospital-mortality (HR: 0.5, CI 0.28-0.87, p = 0.015) and 6-month mortality (HR: 0.44, CI 0.24-0.82, p = 0.01). Conclusions: The use of OX, BB and BBOX is common within the adult burn patient population, with its use varying considerably across sites worldwide. Our findings found mixed associations between outcomes and the use of BB and OX in adult burn patients, with lower acute and 6-month-mortality with BB and longer times to discharge with OX. Further research into these pharmacological modulators of the pathophysiological response to severe burn injury is indicated.

The long-term intercorrelation between post-burn pain, anxiety, and depression: a post hoc analysis of the "RE-ENERGIZE" double-blind, randomized, multicenter placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite the growing prevalence of burn survivors, a gap persists in our understanding of the correlation between acute burn trauma and the long-term impact on psychosocial health. This study set out to investigate the prevalence of long-term pain and symptoms of anxiety and depression in survivors of extensive burns, comparing this to the general population, and identify injury and demographic-related factors predisposing individuals to psychosocial compromise. METHODS: RE-ENERGIZE was an international, double-blinded, randomized-controlled trial that enrolled 1200 patients with partial- or full-thickness burns that required surgical treatment. For the post hoc analysis, we excluded participants who did not complete the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire. Normative data were taken from the 2021 National Health Interview Survey dataset. Propensity score matching was performed using the nearest-neighbor 1-to-1 method, and the two cohorts were compared in terms of chronic pain, and symptoms of anxiety and depression. A multivariable analysis was performed on the burns cohort to identify factors predicting post-discharge pain and symptoms of anxiety and depression. RESULTS: A total of 600 burn patients and 26,666 general population adults were included in this study. Following propensity score matching, both groups comprised 478 participants each, who were predominately male, white, overweight and between 20 and 60 years old. Compared to the general population, burn patients were significantly more likely to report the presence of moderate and a lot of pain (p = 0.002). Symptoms of anxiety were significantly higher in the burn population in two of four levels (most of the time; some of the time; p < 0.0001 for both). Responders in the burn population were significantly less likely to report the absence of depressive symptoms (p < 0.0001). Burn patients were also significantly more likely to report that their mental health affects their social life. TBSA, history of depression, and female sex were identified as independently associated factors for pain, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. The presence of chronic pain and anxiety symptoms independently predicted for symptoms of depression. CONCLUSIONS: Analyzing the largest multicenter cohort of patients with extensive burns, we find that burn injury is associated with chronic pain, and symptoms of anxiety and depression. In addition, TBSA-burned and history of depression directly correlate with the prevalence of chronic pain, and symptoms of anxiety and depression. Finally, pain, and symptoms of anxiety and depression are interrelated and may have interactive effects on the process of recovery following burn injury. Burn patients would, therefore, benefit from a multidisciplinary team approach with early mobilization of pain and mental health experts, in order to promptly prevent the development of psychosocial challenges and their consequences.

NovoSorb® Biodegradable Temporising Matrix (BTM): What we learned from the first 300 consecutive cases.

INTRODUCTION: Extensive full-thickness soft-tissue defects remain a challenge in reconstructive surgery. NovoSorb® Biodegradable Temporising Matrix (BTM) represents a novel dermal substitute and was evaluated in wounds deriving from different aetiologies and to highlight risk factors for poor take rates. METHODS: All patients treated with BTM at our department between March 2020 and October 2022 were included. Differences in univariate and linear regression models identified predictors and risk factors for take rates of BTM and split-thickness skin grafts (STSG). RESULTS: Three hundred patients (mean age 54.2 ± 20.1 years, 66.3% male, 59.7% burns, 19.7% trauma and 20.6% others) were evaluated. Mean take rates of BTM and STSG after BTM delamination were 82.7 ± 25.2% and 86.0 ± 22.6%, respectively. Multiple regression analyses showed that higher body mass index (BMI, OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.86, -0.01, p = 0.44), prior allograft transplantation (OR 15.12, 95% CI 26.98, -3.31, p = 0.041), longer trauma-to-BTM-application intervals (OR 0.01, 95% CI 0.001, -0.001, p = 0.038), positive wound swabs before BTM (OR 7.15, 95% CI 13.50, -0.80, p = 0.028) and peripheral artery disease (OR 10.80, 95% CI 18.63, -2.96, p = 0.007) were associated with poorer BTM take. Higher BMI (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.76, -0.08, p = 0.026), increasing BTM graft surface areas (OR 0.58, 95% CI -1.00, -0.17, p = 0.005), prior allograft (OR 12.20, 95% CI -21.99, -2.41, p = 0.015) or autograft transplantations (OR 22.42, 95% CI 38.69, -6.14, p = 0.001), tumour as the aetiology of the wound (OR 37.42, 95% CI 57.41, -17.83, p = 0.001), diabetes (OR 6.64, 95% CI 12.80, -0.48, p = 0.035) and impaired kidney function (OR 5.90, 95% CI 10.94, -0.86, p = 0.021) were associated with poorer STSG take after delamination of BTM, whereas higher BTM take rates were associated with better STSG take (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.31,0.50, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Extensive complex wounds of different aetiologies unsuitable for immediate STSG can be successfully reconstructed by means of two-staged BTM application and subsequent skin grafting. Importantly, presence of wound contamination or infection and prior allograft coverage appear to jeopardise good BTM and STSG take.

[Treatment of Burn Shock - The First 24 hours and Beyond]. / Die Therapie des Verbrennungsschocks ­ die ersten 24 h und darüber hinaus.

Acute phase and resuscitation after burn trauma are challenging even for specialised burn centres due to the individual onset and differences compared with other forms of shock. The guidelines of the German Society of Burn Medicine (DGV) cover the scientific basis of modern burn treatment. Nevertheless, uncertainty remains regarding the detailed practical handling. This expert consensus focuses on best practices for the treatment of patients with major burns in specialised burn centres and by clinical first responders. The short version of this expert consensus can be downloaded at: https://verbrennungsmedizin.de/files/dgv_files/pdf/positionspapier/Pos%20Therapie%20des%20Verbrennungsschock%20AK%20Intensivmedizin%202023.pdf.

The status quo of early burn wound excision: Insights from the German burn registry.

BACKGROUND: There is a common, well-known and established recommendation to excise burn wounds within 24-72 h in order to mitigate the systemic inflammatory and immunomodulatory response, shorten length of hospitalization through early grafting and optimize patient survival. Despite this apparent consensus, surprisingly few systematic studies have evaluated the actual adherence to this practice and its implications on patient outcomes. In this registry study, we sought to objectify the current status of early burn wound excision, its influencing factors and impact on patient outcomes for all German burn centers. METHODS: The German burn registry ('Deutsches Verbrennungsregister') was queried for 3 consecutive years for all patients, who received at least one surgical intervention. Patients were stratified based on whether the first surgical procedure was performed early (EE, within 72 h) or late (LE, after 72 h) post-burn. Descriptive statistics and univariate regressions were performed to quantify fraction of EE vs. LE and to evaluate factors which might favor one over the other (i.e. age, inhalation injury, burn severity by total body surface area (TBSA), scald vs. other burns, obesity, time of admission). Key patient outcomes were analyzed for each group (i.e. mortality, length of hospitalization, number of surgeries) and multifactorial regression analyses were carried out to model the impact of EE on mortality. Statistical significance was accepted at p < 0.05. RESULTS: After initial screening, 1494 complete records were included for final analysis and were stratified into EE and LE. Only 670 (44%) underwent EE within 72 h. Increasing TBSA burned (i.e. [TBSA > 30%]: 53.8% EE, [TBSA < 30%]: 43.5% EE, p < 0.01) and admission on a weekday between Sunday and Wednesday were associated with higher probability of EE (51.5% EE) versus Thursday to Sunday (37.3%, p < 0.001). Age, inhalation injury, cause of burn, and obesity had no effect on EE vs. LE. Patients with EE had significantly shorter median lengths of hospitalization (EE: 18 d, LE: 21 d, p < 0.01). The median number of operations was comparable for both groups. Gross mortality appeared higher in the EE group, but turned out to be comparable to LE after correction for age, TBSA and sex in multifactorial regression analysis. CONCLUSION: Despite apparent consensus among burn physicians, early excision of burn wounds is performed in less than 50% of cases in German burn centers. The relationship of EE to TBSA burned is expected and clinically sound, while a dependence on admission weekday raises administrative and infrastructural questions, especially when patients who receive EE have significantly shorter hospital stays. More analyses from other burn repositories are needed to compare and benchmark the international status quo of early burn wound excision.

One-stage double free flap arteriovenous loop reconstruction of a massive abdominothoracic defect following necrotizing fasciitis: A case report.

We report the case of a 67-year old male with necrotizing fasciitis after injection of the glenohumeral joint. After extensive debridement a massive defect from the left hip joint to the left upper arm, exposing ribs, scapula, axillary vessels and brachial plexus (45 × 40 cm) was present. Reconstruction was performed with a conjoined right myocutaneous tensor fasciae lata/vastus lateralis flap and a left myocutaneous vastus lateralis flap in combination with an arteriovenous loop originating from the axillary vessels using the greater saphenous vein. Revisional surgeries were necessary including ribs resection and flap re-advancements. Due to multiorganic failure invasive ventilation, renal replacement- and extensive transfusion therapy was required. After 241 days the patient was discharged for rehabilitation. At the 12 months follow-up wounds were sufficiently closed without the need for further intervention. This case illustrates that immediate diagnosis followed by an aggressive multidisciplinary treatment approach is crucial for the patient survival.