Radiation and Melanoma: Where Are We Now?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes the current role of radiotherapy for the treatment of cutaneous melanoma in the definitive, adjuvant, and palliative settings, and combinations with immunotherapy and targeted therapies. RECENT FINDINGS: Definitive radiotherapy may be considered for lentigo maligna if surgery would be disfiguring. High risk, resected melanoma may be treated with adjuvant radiotherapy, but the role is poorly defined since the advent of effective systemic therapies. For patients with metastatic disease, immunotherapy and targeted therapies can be delivered safely in tandem with radiotherapy to improve outcomes. Radiotherapy and modern systemic therapies act in concert to improve outcomes, especially in the metastatic setting. Further prospective data is needed to guide the use of definitive radiotherapy for lentigo maligna and adjuvant radiotherapy for high-risk melanoma in the immunotherapy era. Current evidence does not support an abscopal response or at least identify the conditions necessary to reliably produce one with combinations of radiation and immunotherapy.

Normal tissue dose and risk estimates from whole and partial breast radiation techniques.

PURPOSE: To compare radiation dose to organs at risk in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with lumpectomy and intraoperative radiation therapy with CT-guided HDR brachytherapy (precision breast IORT; PB-IORT) and those treated with external beam whole breast irradiation (WB-DIBH) or partial breast irradiation (PB-DIBH) with deep inspiratory breath hold. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 52 consecutive patients with left-sided breast cancers treated with either PB-IORT (n = 17, 76% outer breast) on a phase I clinical trial, adjuvant PB-DIBH (n = 18, 56% outer breast, 6% cavity boost), or WB-DIBH (n = 17, 76% outer breast, 53% with lumpectomy cavity boost). Conventional (2 Gy/fraction) or moderate hypofractionation (2.66 Gy/fraction) was prescribed for the external beam cohorts and 12.5 Gy in 1 fraction to 1 cm from the balloon surface was prescribed to the HDR brachytherapy cohort. CT-based planning was used for all patients. Organ at risk doses and excess risk ratios (ERR) for secondary lung cancers, contralateral breast cancers, and cardiac toxicity were compared between treatment techniques. RESULTS: Compared to WB-DIBH and PB-DIBH, PB-IORT resulted in lower ipsilateral lung V5, V10, V20, mean, and max dose (P < .05). Mean ipsilateral lung BED3Gy was as follows: 1.32 Gy for PB-IORT, 4.33 Gy for WB-DIBH, 3.35 Gy for PB-DIBH. The ERR for lung cancer was lowest for PB-IORT (P < .001). There was significantly higher contralateral breast max dose but lower mean BED3Gy for WB-DIBH compared with PB-IORT (P = .012, P = .011, respectively). Mean contralateral breast BED3Gy was as follows: 0.10 Gy for PB-IORT, 0.06 Gy for WB-DIBH, and 0.08 Gy for PB-DIBH. The ERR for contralateral breast cancer was low for all breast techniques, but WB-DIBH showed lower ERR compared to PB-IORT (P = .019). Mean heart BED2Gy was higher with PB-IORT at 1.26 Gy compared to 0.48 Gy and 0.24 Gy for WB-DIBH and PB-DIBH, respectively (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with PB-IORT and with tissue-sparing external beam techniques all received low organ at risk doses, but PB-IORT resulted in far lower ipsilateral lung dose compared with external beam techniques. Our data indicate the lowest mean contralateral breast BED in the WB-DIBH group, likely due to the simplicity of the field design in low-risk patients using tangential whole breast radiation. External beam using DIBH results in lowest heart dose, but all techniques were well within recommended heart constraints.

Changes in the muscles of mastication before and after primary stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia.

OBJECTIVE: The motor root of the trigeminal nerve runs close to the sensory root and receives considerable radiation during Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for trigeminal neuralgia (TN). The object of this study was to evaluate via MRI the changes in the muscles of mastication before and after upfront GKRS in patients with idiopathic TN. METHODS: In this single-institution retrospective cohort study, all patients with idiopathic unilateral TN treated with primary GKRS at the University of Virginia in the period from 2007 to 2017 were included provided that they had pre- and post-GKRS MRI data. The thicknesses of the temporalis, pterygoid, and masseter muscles were measured on both pre- and post-GKRS MRI in a blinded fashion. Changes in the muscles like fatty infiltration, MRI signal, or atrophy were noted. RESULTS: Among the 68 patients eligible for inclusion in the study, 136 temporalis muscles, 136 medial pterygoid muscles, 136 lateral pterygoid muscles, and 136 masseter muscles were assessed. A subset of patients was found to have muscle atrophy even prior to GKRS. Pre-GKRS atrophy of the masseter, medial pterygoid, lateral pterygoid, and temporalis muscles was seen in 18 (26%), 16 (24%), 9 (13%), and 16 (24%) patients, respectively. Logistic regression analysis showed that distribution of pain in the V3 territory (p = 0.01, OR 5.43, 95% CI 1.46-20.12) and significant pain on chewing (p = 0.02, OR 5.32, 95% CI 1.25-22.48) were predictive of pre-GKRS atrophy. Reversal of atrophy of these muscles occurred after GKRS in a majority of the patients. The incidence of new-onset permanent post-GKRS muscle atrophy was 1.5%. The median follow-up was 39 months (range 6-108 months). CONCLUSIONS: A subset of patients with TN with significant pain on chewing have pre-GKRS disuse atrophy of the muscles of mastication. A reversal of the atrophy occurs in a majority of the patients following GKRS. New-onset motor neuropathy post-GKRS was rare.

Anticoagulation with bivalirudin during percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this retrospective analysis of high-risk patients treated with bivalirudin during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) without concomitant glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibition. BACKGROUND: Reperfusion by PCI is the treatment of choice for patients with STEMI. In patients with stable or unstable angina without ST-segment elevation undergoing PCI, bivalirudin was at least as effective as heparin plus GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors in reducing ischemic events and more effective in preventing bleeding. There are no published studies detailing the use of bivalirudin in patients with STEMI. METHODS: From 09/02 to 05/03 at the Heart Care Centers of Illinois, Blue Island, Illinois. Ninety-one consecutive patients with STEMI underwent PCI with or without stent placement. Bivalirudin was administered as a bolus dose (0.75 mg/kg) followed by infusion (1.75 mg/kg/hr) for the duration of the procedure. Outcomes were recorded over a 30-day follow-up period. RESULTS: Patients (n = 91) had several high-risk characteristics (40% female, 30% diabetes mellitus, 21% previous MI and 18% cardiogenic shock). PCI procedures utilized balloons, stents, or a combination of both. Intraaortic balloon pumps were used for 41% and closure devices for 24% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation demonstrates excellent TIMI flow without the addition of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors. The low mortality and complication rates suggest anticoagulation with bivalirudin in patients with STEMI undergoing PCI is feasible and warrants further study in larger controlled trials to evaluate the effectiveness of bivalirudin in this patient population.