Household coping strategies associated with unreliable water supplies and diarrhea in Ecuador, an upper-middle-income country.

The Sustainable Development Goals recognize that the availability and quality of improved water sources affect how households use and benefit from these sources. Although unreliability in piped water supplies in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has been described, few studies have assessed household coping strategies in response to unreliable water supplies and associated health outcomes. We characterized unreliability in the piped water supply of the town of Borbón, Ecuador over the twelve years following a major upgrade, as well as household coping strategies and associations with diarrhea. We examined trends in primary and secondary drinking water sources, water storage, and water treatment using longitudinal data collected from 2005 to 2012. In 2017, a follow-up survey was administered (N = 202) and a subset of 84 household water samples were tested for chlorine residual levels and microbial contamination. From 2005 to 2017, access to a household water connection increased from 19.4% to 90.3%. However, reliability decreased over time, as in the latter half of 2009, households had access to piped water 79% of the time, compared to 63% by 2017. Piped water samples were highly contaminated with total coliforms (100% of samples) and Escherichia coli (89% of samples). From 2005 to 2017, households less likely to report drinking water treatment (50.6%-5.0%). And from 2009 to 2017, bottled water was increasingly consumed as the primary drinking water source (18.8%-62.4%). From 2005 to 2012, having a household connection was not statistically significantly associated with diarrhea case status (OR: 0.86 95%CI: 0.53, 1.39). Neither household water treatment nor bottled water consumption were negatively associated with diarrhea. Increased water storage was associated with diarrhea (OR: 1.33 per 10L of water stored, 95%CI: 1.05, 1.69). Household water treatment, and consumption of purchased bottled water, two coping strategies that households may have undertaken in response to an unreliable water supply, were not associated with a reduced likelihood of diarrhea. These data suggest a need to understand how impoverished rural households in LMICs respond to unreliable water supplies, and to develop heath messaging appropriate for this context.

Video surveillance captures student hand hygiene behavior, reactivity to observation, and peer influence in Kenyan primary schools.

BACKGROUND: In-person structured observation is considered the best approach for measuring hand hygiene behavior, yet is expensive, time consuming, and may alter behavior. Video surveillance could be a useful tool for objectively monitoring hand hygiene behavior if validated against current methods. METHODS: Student hand cleaning behavior was monitored with video surveillance and in-person structured observation, both simultaneously and separately, at four primary schools in urban Kenya over a study period of 8 weeks. FINDINGS: Video surveillance and in-person observation captured similar rates of hand cleaning (absolute difference <5%, p = 0.74). Video surveillance documented higher hand cleaning rates (71%) when at least one other person was present at the hand cleaning station, compared to when a student was alone (48%; rate ratio  = 1.14 [95% CI 1.01-1.28]). Students increased hand cleaning rates during simultaneous video and in-person monitoring as compared to single-method monitoring, suggesting reactivity to each method of monitoring. This trend was documented at schools receiving a handwashing with soap intervention, but not at schools receiving a sanitizer intervention. CONCLUSION: Video surveillance of hand hygiene behavior yields results comparable to in-person observation among schools in a resource-constrained setting. Video surveillance also has certain advantages over in-person observation, including rapid data processing and the capability to capture new behavioral insights. Peer influence can significantly improve student hand cleaning behavior and, when possible, should be exploited in the design and implementation of school hand hygiene programs.

Access to waterless hand sanitizer improves student hand hygiene behavior in primary schools in Nairobi, Kenya.

Handwashing is difficult in settings with limited resources and water access. In primary schools within urban Kibera, Kenya, we investigated the impact of providing waterless hand sanitizer on student hand hygiene behavior. Two schools received a waterless hand sanitizer intervention, two schools received a handwashing with soap intervention, and two schools received no intervention. Hand cleaning behavior after toilet use was monitored for 2 months using structured observation. Hand cleaning after toileting was 82% at sanitizer schools (N = 2,507 toileting events), 38% at soap schools (N = 3,429), and 37% at control schools (N = 2,797). Students at sanitizer schools were 23% less likely to have observed rhinorrhea than control students (P = 0.02); reductions in student-reported gastrointestinal and respiratory illness symptoms were not statistically significant. Providing waterless hand sanitizer markedly increased student hand cleaning after toilet use, whereas the soap intervention did not. Waterless hand sanitizer may be a promising option to improve student hand cleansing behavior, particularly in schools with limited water access.