Hormone-Related Migraine Headaches and Mood Disorders: Treatment with Estrogen Stabilization.

Because estrogens and the trigeminal system are inherently linked, prescribers who are treating a woman with a hormonally related mood disorder and migraine headaches should consider hormonal options to optimize the patient's treatment. This article discusses the interrelationships of estrogen, serotonin, and the trigeminal system as they relate to menstrual migraine occurrence and hormone-related mood symptoms. In addition, clinical examples are provided to facilitate the prescribers treating women during reproductive transitions in which declining estrogens are related to their suffering.

Standard of care.

"Standard of care" sounds like a medical term, but it is a universal legal concept. It is codified differently by individual state statutes and is written into each state's uniform jury instructions. The phrase increasingly appears in scientific articles discussing the management of patients with headache. But, the term usually is not defined nor is evidence presented to justify the notion that the so-called standard has any scientific basis. In a courtroom,jury instructions using this phrase can be a legal sword aimed at a defendant doctor, rather than a shield. At risk is a physician's basic right to care for a patient according to that individual's particular needs.

Standard of care.

"Standard of care" sounds like a medical term, but actually it is a universal legal concept. It is codified differently by individual state statutes and is written into each state's uniform jury instructions. The phrase increasingly appears in scientific articles discussing the management of patients with headache. But, the term usually is not defined nor is evidence presented to justify the notion that the so-called standard has any scientific basis. In a courtroom, jury instructions using this phrase can be a legal sword aimed at a defendant doctor, rather than a shield. At risk is a physician's basic right to care for a patient according to that individual's particular needs.

Sumatriptan/Naproxen sodium for migraine: efficacy, health related quality of life, and satisfaction outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the pain relief, satisfaction, and health-related quality of life results of moderate or severe migraines treated with a sumatriptan/naproxen sodium combination tablet. METHODS: Sumatriptan and naproxen sodium as a single-dose formulation tablet was used to treat moderate to severe migraines over a 12-month period in a phase 3, open-label, multicenter study (n = 565) in patients with at least 6 months' history of migraine headaches. RESULTS: Seventy percent of all attacks were treated with 1 dose of sumatriptan/naproxen sodium. Overall subjects treated 24,485 attacks; of these, 81% attacks achieved pain relief and 60% pain-free by 2 hours. At 3 months, the percentage of patients satisfied or very satisfied increased from baseline on all 8 Patient Perception of Migraine Questionnaire (PPMQ) items and remained high throughout the study. Mean Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) domain scores also increased by 13-15 points from baseline during this time and remained high. CONCLUSIONS: Sumatriptan/naproxen sodium provides consistent relief of migraine attacks over 12 months, resulting in improved patient satisfaction and migraine specific quality of life.

Efficacy of sumatriptan tablets in migraineurs self-described or physician-diagnosed as having sinus headache: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Many patients and physicians interpret episodic headache in the presence or absence of nasal symptoms as "sinus' headache, while ignoring the possible diagnosis of migraine. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of sumatriptan succinate 50-mg tablets in patients with migraine presenting with "sinus" headache. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study was conducted in adult (aged 18-65 years) migraine patients presenting with self-described or physician-diagnosed "sinus" headache. From November 2001 to March 2002, patients meeting International Headache Society criteria for migraine (with > or =2 of the following: unilateral location, pulsating quality, moderate or severe intensity, aggravation by moderate physical activity; and > or =1 of: phonophobia and phonophobia, nausea and/or vomiting) and with no evidence of bacterial rhinosinusitis were enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio via computer-generated randomization schedule to receive either 1 sumatriptan 50-mg tablet or matching placebo tablet. The primary efficacy end point was headache response (moderate or severe headache pain reduced to mild or no headache pain) at 2 hours after administration. The presence or absence of migraine-associated symptoms and sinus and nasal symptoms was also measured. Tolerability was assessed through patient-reported adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Two hundred sixteen patients with self-described or physician-diagnosed "sinus" headache received a migraine diagnosis and treated 1 migraine attack with sumatriptan 50 mg. The efficacy (intent-to-treat) analysis included 215 patients treated with sumatriptan 50 mg (n = 108; mean [SD] age, 39.6 [12.3] years; mean [SD] weight, 77.7 [17.7] kg; sex, 71% female; race, 69% white) or placebo (n = 107; mean [SD] age, 41.0 [11.3] years; mean [SD] weight 80.7 [20.9] kg; sex, 69% female; race, 64% white). Significantly more patients treated with sumatriptan 50 mg achieved a positive headache response at 2 and 4 hours after administration compared with those treated with placebo (69% vs 43% at 2 hours and 76% vs 49% at 4 hours, respectively; both, P < 0.001). Significantly more sumatriptan-treated patients were free from sinus pain compared with placebo recipients at 2 hours (63% vs 49% placebo, P = 0.049) and 4 hours (77% vs 55%, P = 0.001). All treatments were generally well tolerated. The most common drug-related AEs reported in the sumatriptan and placebo groups, respectively, were dizziness (5% vs < 1%), nausea (3% vs 2%), other pressure/tightness (defined as sense of heaviness; heaviness of upper body, upper extremities; jaw tension; neck tension) (4% vs 0%), and temperature sensations (defined as warm feeling of back of neck, or flushing) (2% vs 0%). No patients experienced any serious AEs. CONCLUSIONS: Sumatriptan 50-mg tablets were effective and generally well tolerated in the treatment of these patients presenting with migraine headaches that were self-described or physician-diagnosed as sinus headaches.

An otolaryngology, neurology, allergy, and primary care consensus on diagnosis and treatment of sinus headache.

While "sinus" headache is a widely accepted clinical diagnosis, many medical specialists consider it to be an uncommon cause of recurrent headaches. Unnecessary diagnostic studies, surgical interventions, and medical treatments are often the result of the inappropriate diagnosis of sinus headache. Both the International Headache Society and the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery have attempted to characterize conditions leading to headaches of rhinogenic origin. However, they have done so from different perspectives and in isolation from the other specialty groups. An interdisciplinary ad hoc committee recently convened to discuss the role of sinus disease and the nose in the etiology of headache and to review recent epidemiologic studies suggesting that sinus headache (headache of rhinogenic origin) and migraine are frequently confused with one another. Clinical trial data are presented which clearly indicate that the majority of sinus headaches can actually be classified as migraines. This committee reviewed scientific evidence available from multiple disciplines and concludes that considerable research and clinical study are needed to further understand and explain the role of nasal pathology and autonomic activation in migraine and headaches of rhinogenic origin. However, there was a consensus from this group that greater diagnostic and therapeutic attention needs to be given to patients complaining of sinus headache that may indeed be due to the nose.

Sinus headache: a neurology, otolaryngology, allergy, and primary care consensus on diagnosis and treatment.

Sinus headache is a widely accepted clinical diagnosis, although many medical specialists consider it an uncommon cause of recurrent headaches. The inappropriate diagnosis of sinus headache can lead to unnecessary diagnostic studies, surgical interventions, and medical treatments. Both the International Headache Society and the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery have attempted to define conditions that lead to headaches of rhinogenic origin but have done so from different perspectives and in isolation of each other. An interdisciplinary ad hoc committee convened to discuss the role of sinus disease as a cause of headache and to review recent epidemiological studies that suggest sinus headache (headache of rhinogenic origin) and migraine are frequently confused with one another. This committee reviewed available scientific evidence from multiple disciplines and concluded that considerable research and clinical study are required to further understand and delineate the role of nasal pathology and autonomic activation in migraine and headaches of rhinogenic origin. However, this group agreed that greater diagnostic and therapeutic attention needs to be given to patients with sinus headaches.

Treatment of primary headache in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Each year many patients present to an emergency department for treatment of acute primary headache. We investigated the diagnosis and clinical outcome of patients treated for primary headache in the emergency department. METHODS: Patients treated for acute primary headache in the emergency department completed a questionnaire related to their headache symptoms, response to treatment, and ability to return to normal function. These responses were compared to the treating physicians' observations of the patient's condition at the time of discharge from the emergency department. RESULTS: Based on the questionnaire, 95% of the 57 respondents met International Headache Society diagnostic criteria for migraine. Emergency department physicians, however, diagnosed only 32% of the respondents with migraine, while 59% were diagnosed as having "cephalgia" or "headache NOS" (not otherwise specified). All patients previously had taken nonprescription medication, and 49% had never taken a triptan. In the emergency department, only 7% of the patients received a drug "specific" for migraine (ie, a triptan or dihydroergotamine). Sixty-five percent of the patients were treated with a "migraine cocktail" comprised of a variable mixture of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent, a dopamine antagonist, and/or an antihistamine; 24% were treated with opioids. All 57 patients reported that after discharge they had to rest or sleep and were unable to return to normal function. Sixty percent of patients still had headache 24 hours after discharge from the emergency department. CONCLUSION: The overwhelming majority of patients who present to an emergency department with acute primary headache have migraine, but the majority of patients receive a less specific diagnosis and a treatment that is correspondingly nonspecific.