How is complexity measured and detected among community dwelling older people aged 65 years and over? A scoping review.

AIM: To identify and explore tools that measured and detected complexity of care among community dwelling people aged 65 years and older. DATA SOURCES: Databases were searched for articles published up to 23 September 2022 including CINAHL, EMBASE and MEDLINE, Cochrane database for trials and grey literature. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted and reported in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Eligible articles included those with participants aged over 65 years, living in the community and studies that included care complexity detection or assessment and how this related to care delivered. Covidence was used to screen titles, abstracts and full-text articles. RESULTS: Eighteen full texts were reviewed; four studies were included in the final review. All selected studies included people aged over 65 years living in the community. A high level of reliability for the items included in the interventions was found. The selected studies included tools for assessing older person's needs with nurses involved in the assessment. CONCLUSION: The review identified four tools for measuring complexity in community dwelling older people. Two tools have the capacity to objectively measure complexity due to the holistic nature of items included and appear easy to use to support clinical judgement decisions. IMPACT: The review places a spotlight on the concept of complexity and highlights the lack of definition of care complexity. The synthesized result highlights the need to explore detection of care complexity of older people further and consider ways of supporting clinical judgement and decision making of community nurses. The use of a validated tool may enhance clinical judgement regarding care complexity and may lead to a more consistent and timely approach to care. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: During the development phase, the study was presented to a consumer group from the researcher's workplace. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42022299336.

Nurses' experience of managing adults living with multimorbidity: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: The number of adults living with two or more chronic conditions is increasing worldwide. Adults living with multimorbidity have complex physical, psychosocial and self-management care needs. AIM: This study aimed to describe Australian nurses' experience of care provision for adults living with multimorbidity, their perceived education needs and future opportunities for nurses in the management of multimorbidity. DESIGN: Qualitative exploratory. METHODS: Nurses providing care to adults living with multimorbidity in any setting were invited to take part in a semi-structured interview in August 2020. Twenty-four registered nurses took part in a semi-structured telephone interview. RESULTS: Three main themes were developed: (1) The care of adults living with multimorbidity requires skilled collaborative and holistic care; (2) nurses' practice in multimorbidity care is evolving; and (3) nurses value education and training in multimorbidity care. CONCLUSION: Nurses recognize the challenge and the need for change in the system to support them to respond to the increasing demands they face. IMPACT: The complexity and prevalence of multimorbidity creates challenges for a healthcare system configured to treat individual disease. Nurses are key in providing care for this population, but little is known about nurses' experiences and perceptions of their role. Nurses believe a person-centred approach is important to address the complex needs of adults living with multimorbidity. Nurses described their role as evolving in response to the growing demand for quality care and believed inter-professional approaches achieve the best outcomes for adults living with multimorbidity. The research has relevance for all healthcare providers seeking to provide effective care for adults living with multimorbidity. Understanding how best to equip and support the workforce to meet the issues and demands of managing the care of adults living with multimorbidity has the potential to improve patient outcomes. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: There was no patient or public contribution. The study only concerned the providers of the service.

Nurses' perceptions and beliefs related to the care of adults living with multimorbidity: A systematic qualitative review.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To identify and synthesise the available qualitative evidence on nurses' perceptions and beliefs related to the care of adults living with multimorbidity. BACKGROUND: The rising prevalence of adults living with multimorbidity has increased demand for health care and challenges nursing care. No review has been conducted to date of the studies of nurses' perceptions and beliefs related to the provision of care to guide policy makers, practitioners and further research to identify and deliver quality care for persons living with multimorbidity. DESIGN: Systematic review of qualitative studies conducted in line with the PRISMA checklist. METHODOLOGY: Eight electronic publication databases and sources of grey literature were searched to identify original qualitative studies of the experience of nurses caring for adults with multiple chronic conditions with no restrictions on the date of publication or study context. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. Data were extracted using the Joanna Briggs Institute standardised data extraction tool for qualitative research. Data synthesis was undertaken through meta-aggregation. RESULTS: Eleven qualitative studies were included in the review. All studies met eight or more of the 10 assessment criteria of the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. Four synthesised findings were generated from the aggregated findings: (i) the challenge of providing nursing care; (ii) the need to deliver holistic and person-centred nursing care; (iii) the importance of developing a therapeutic nurse-patient relationship, and (iv) delivering nursing care as part of an interprofessional care team. CONCLUSIONS: The complexity of multimorbidity and the predominant single-disease model of chronic care present challenges for the delivery of nursing care to adults living with multimorbidity. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The nursing care of persons with multimorbidity needs to incorporate holistic assessment and person-centred care principles as part of a collaborative and interprofessional team approach. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42020186773.

Improving Detection of Client Complexity in the Community (Impact): A Study Protocol of a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Community-dwelling older clients are becoming increasingly complex. Detecting this complexity in clinical practice is limited, with greater reliance on community nurses' clinical judgment and skills. The lack of a consistent approach to complexity impacts the level of care and support for older clients to remain in their homes for longer. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness of the Patient Complexity Instrument (PCI) in addition to nurses' clinical judgment to enhance detection of complexity, and subsequent older clients' resource allocation compared to usual nursing assessment. DESIGN: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial will be conducted within a community nursing service in regional Victoria, Australia. Clients 65 years and over referred to the service who are eligible for Commonwealth Home Support Programme (CHSP) funding will be randomized into Control group: usual nursing assessment or Intervention group: usual nursing assessment plus the PCI. Nurse participants are Registered Nurses currently employed in the community nursing service. RESULTS: This study will explore whether introducing the PCI in a community nursing service enhances detection of complexity and client care resource allocation compared to nurses' clinical judgment based on usual nursing assessment. CONCLUSION: This protocol outlines the study to enhance the detection of complexity by nurses delivering care for community-dwelling older people in the regional Australian context. The findings will inform the use of a standardized tool to detect complexity among community-dwelling older Australians.

Surveillance of AF recurrence post-surgical AF ablation using implantable cardiac monitor.

BACKGROUND: Although pulmonary vein isolation is an effective treatment for recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF), there is no consensus on the definition of success or follow-up strategies. Existing data are limited to intermittent Holter or transtelephonic monitoring with reliance on patient symptoms. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the outcomes of surgical ablation and post-ablation AF surveillance with a leadless implantable cardiac monitor (ICM). METHODS: Forty-five patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal or persistent AF underwent video-assisted epicardial ablation using a bipolar radiofrequency clamp. An ICM was implanted subcutaneously post-ablation to assess AF recurrence. AF recurrence was defined as ≥1 AF episode with a duration of ≥30 s. The device-stored data was downloaded weekly over the internet, and all transmitted events were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 1,220 AF automatic and patient-activated AF episodes were analyzed over a follow-up of 12 ± 3 months. Of these episodes, 46% were asymptomatic. Furthermore, only 66% of the patient-activated episodes were AF. AF recurrence was highest in first 4 weeks and substantially decreased 6 months post-ablation. The overall freedom from AF recurrence at the end of follow-up was 60%. When 48-h Holter recordings were compared with the device-stored episodes, the sensitivity of the device to detect AF was 98%, and the specificity was 71%. CONCLUSIONS: The ICM provides an objective measure of AF ablation success and may be useful in making clinical decisions. This device may be used in future ablation studies to develop a more rigorous definition of procedural success.