Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
1.
Mult Scler ; 30(3): 283-291, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38389172

RESUMO

T1/T2-weighted ratio is a novel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarker based on conventional sequences, related to microstructural integrity and with increasing use in multiple sclerosis (MS) research. Different from other advanced MRI techniques, this method has the advantage of being based on routinely acquired MRI sequences, a feature that enables analysis of retrospective cohorts with considerable clinical value. This article provides an overview of this method, describing the previous cross-sectional and longitudinal findings in the main MS clinical phenotypes and in different brain tissues: focal white matter (WM) lesions, normal-appearing white matter (NAWM), cortical gray matter (GM), and deep normal-appearing gray matter (NAGM). We also discuss the clinical associations, possible reasons for conflicting results, correlations with other MRI-based measures, and histopathological associations. We highlight the limitations of the biomarker itself and the methodology of each study. Finally, we update the reader on its potential use as an imaging biomarker in research.


Assuntos
Esclerose Múltipla , Substância Branca , Humanos , Esclerose Múltipla/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Transversais , Encéfalo/patologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Substância Branca/patologia , Biomarcadores
2.
Arq Neuropsiquiatr ; 80(5 Suppl 1): 159-172, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35976318

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy dramatically changed the natural history of multiple sclerosis (MS), which was classically associated with severe disability. Treatment strategies advocate that early control of disease activity is crucial to avoid progressive disability, and the use of high efficacy drugs may be beneficial, but safety is a concern. Choosing the disease-modifying therapy is challenging in clinical practice and should be further discussed. OBJECTIVE: To discuss the state of art of selecting the initial therapy for relapsing MS patients. METHODS: We used a case-based approach followed by clinical discussion, exploring therapeutic options in different MS settings. RESULTS: We presented clinical cases profile compatible with the use of MS therapies, classified into moderate and high efficacy. In the moderate efficacy group, we discussed interferons, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide and dimethyl fumarate, while in the high efficacy group we discussed fingolimod, cladribine, natalizumab, ocrelizumab, alemtuzumab and ofatumumab. CONCLUSION: Advances in MS treatment are remarkable. Strong evidence supports the use of early high efficacy therapy. However, biomarkers, clinical and radiologic prognostic factors, as well as patients' individual issues, should be valued and considered for a personalized treatment decision.


Assuntos
Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente , Esclerose Múltipla , Cloridrato de Fingolimode/uso terapêutico , Acetato de Glatiramer/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Esclerose Múltipla/tratamento farmacológico , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente/tratamento farmacológico
3.
Arq. neuropsiquiatr ; 80(5,supl.1): 159-172, May 2022. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1393949

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Background: Immunotherapy dramatically changed the natural history of multiple sclerosis (MS), which was classically associated with severe disability. Treatment strategies advocate that early control of disease activity is crucial to avoid progressive disability, and the use of high efficacy drugs may be beneficial, but safety is a concern. Choosing the disease-modifying therapy is challenging in clinical practice and should be further discussed. Objective: To discuss the state of art of selecting the initial therapy for relapsing MS patients. Methods: We used a case-based approach followed by clinical discussion, exploring therapeutic options in different MS settings. Results: We presented clinical cases profile compatible with the use of MS therapies, classified into moderate and high efficacy. In the moderate efficacy group, we discussed interferons, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide and dimethyl fumarate, while in the high efficacy group we discussed fingolimod, cladribine, natalizumab, ocrelizumab, alemtuzumab and ofatumumab. Conclusion: Advances in MS treatment are remarkable. Strong evidence supports the use of early high efficacy therapy. However, biomarkers, clinical and radiologic prognostic factors, as well as patients' individual issues, should be valued and considered for a personalized treatment decision.


RESUMO Antecedentes: A imunoterapia mudou drasticamente a história natural da esclerose múltipla (EM), doença esta que era classicamente associada a grandes incapacidades. Sabe-se hoje que o controle precoce da atividade de doença é crucial para evitar incapacidade progressiva, e o uso de terapias de alta eficácia pode ser benéfico. Apesar disso, a segurança ainda é uma preocupação dos pacientes e médicos. A escolha da terapia modificadora da doença é um desafio na prática clínica e suas particularidades devem ser mais discutidas. Objetivo Discutir o estado da arte da seleção da terapia inicial para pacientes com EM remitente recorrente. Métodos Utilizamos uma abordagem baseada em casos clínicos, com discussão das diversas opções terapêuticas em diferentes contextos de EM. Resultados: Foram apresentados casos clínicos compatíveis com o uso das principais terapias para EM, divididas em moderada e alta eficácia. No grupo de moderada eficácia discutimos sobre os interferons, acetato de glatirâmer, teriflunomida e fumarato de dimetila enquanto que no de alta eficácia falamos sobre fingolimode, cladribina, natalizumabe, ocrelizumabe, alentuzumabe e ofatumumabe. Conclusão Os avanços no tratamento da EM são notáveis. Fortes evidências suportam que o uso de terapia de alta eficácia de forma precoce possa ser benéfica. No entanto, biomarcadores, fatores prognósticos clínicos e radiológicos, bem como questões individuais dos pacientes, devem ser valorizados e considerados para uma decisão de tratamento personalizado.

4.
Neuroimage Clin ; 34: 102967, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35202997

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: T1w/T2-w ratio has been proposed as a clinically feasible MRI biomarker to assess tissue integrity in multiple sclerosis. However, no data is available in the earliest stages of the disease and longitudinal studies analysing clinical associations are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To describe longitudinal changes in T1-w/T2-w in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) and multiple sclerosis, and to investigate their clinical associations. METHODS: T1-w/T2-w images were generated and the mean value obtained in the corresponding lesion, normal-appearing grey (NAGM) and white matter (NAWM) masks. By co-registering baseline to follow-up MRI, evolved lesions were assessed; and by placing the mask of new lesions to the baseline study, the pre-lesional tissue integrity was measured. RESULTS: We included 171 CIS patients and 22 established multiple sclerosis patients. In CIS, evolved lesions showed significant T1-w/T2-w increases compared to baseline (+7.6%, P < 0.001). T1-w/T2-w values in new lesions were lower than in pre-lesional tissue (-28.2%, P < 0.001), and pre-lesional tissue was already lower than baseline NAWM (-7.8%, P < 0.001). In CIS at baseline, higher NAGM T1-w/T2-w was associated with multiple sclerosis diagnosis, and longitudinal decreases in NAGM and NAWM T1-w/T2-w were associated with disease activity. In established multiple sclerosis, T1-w/T2-w was inversely correlated with clinical disability and disease duration. CONCLUSION: A decrease in T1-w/T2-w ratio precedes lesion formation. In CIS, higher T1-w/T2-w was associated with multiple sclerosis diagnosis. In established multiple sclerosis, lower T1-w/T2-w values were associated with clinical disability. The possible differential impact of chronic inflammation, iron deposition and demyelination should be considered to interpret these findings.


Assuntos
Doenças Desmielinizantes , Esclerose Múltipla , Substância Branca , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , Encéfalo/patologia , Doenças Desmielinizantes/patologia , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Esclerose Múltipla/patologia , Substância Branca/diagnóstico por imagem , Substância Branca/patologia
5.
Arq Neuropsiquiatr ; 79(11): 1049-1061, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34816999

RESUMO

The Scientific Department of Neuroimmunology of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology (DCNI/ABN) and Brazilian Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis and Neuroimmunological Diseases (BCTRIMS) provide recommendations in this document for vaccination of the population with demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system (CNS) against infections in general and against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes COVID-19. We emphasize the seriousness of the current situation in view of the spread of COVID-19 in our country. Therefore, reference guides on vaccination for clinicians, patients, and public health authorities are particularly important to prevent some infectious diseases. The DCNI/ABN and BCTRIMS recommend that patients with CNS demyelinating diseases (e.g., MS and NMOSD) be continually monitored for updates to their vaccination schedule, especially at the beginning or before a change in treatment with a disease modifying drug (DMD). It is also important to note that vaccines are safe, and physicians should encourage their use in all patients. Clearly, special care should be taken when live attenuated viruses are involved. Finally, it is important for physicians to verify which DMD the patient is receiving and when the last dose was taken, as each drug may affect the induction of immune response differently.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Esclerose Múltipla , Neurologia , Sistema Nervoso Central , Humanos , Esclerose Múltipla/tratamento farmacológico , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação
6.
Becker, Jefferson; Ferreira, Lis Campos; Damasceno, Alfredo; Bichuetti, Denis Bernardi; Christo, Paulo Pereira; Callegaro, Dagoberto; Peixoto, Marco Aurélio Lana; Sousa, Nise Alessandra De Carvalho; Almeida, Sérgio Monteiro De; Adoni, Tarso; Santiago-Amaral, Juliana; Junqueira, Thiago; Pereira, Samira Luisa Apóstolos; Gomes, Ana Beatriz Ayroza Galvão Ribeiro; Pitombeira, Milena; Paolilo, Renata Barbosa; Grzesiuk, Anderson Kuntz; Piccolo, Ana Claudia; D´Almeida, José Arthur Costa; Gomes Neto, Antonio Pereira; Oliveira, Augusto Cesar Penalva De; Oliveira, Bianca Santos De; Tauil, Carlos Bernardo; Vasconcelos, Claudia Ferreira; Kaimen-Maciel, Damacio; Varela, Daniel; Diniz, Denise Sisterolli; Oliveira, Enedina Maria Lobato De; Malfetano, Fabiola Rachid; Borges, Fernando Elias; Figueira, Fernando Faria Andrade; Gondim, Francisco De Assis Aquino; Passos, Giordani Rodrigues Dos; Silva, Guilherme Diogo; Olival, Guilherme Sciascia Do; Santos, Gutemberg Augusto Cruz Dos; Ruocco, Heloisa Helena; Sato, Henry Koiti; Soares Neto, Herval Ribeiro; Cortoni Calia, Leandro; Gonçalves, Marcus Vinícius Magno; Vecino, Maria Cecilia Aragón De; Pimentel, Maria Lucia Vellutini; Ribeiro, Marlise De Castro; Boaventura, Mateus; Parolin, Mônica Koncke Fiuza; Melo, Renata Brant De Souza; Lázaro, Robson; Thomaz, Rodrigo Barbosa; Kleinpaul, Rodrigo; Dias, Ronaldo Maciel; Gomes, Sidney; Lucatto, Simone Abrante; Alves-Leon, Soniza Vieira; Fukuda, Thiago; Ribeiro, Taysa Alexandrino Gonsalves Jubé; Winckler, Thereza Cristina Dávila; Fragoso, Yara Dadalti; Nascimento, Osvaldo José Moreira Do; Ferreira, Maria Lucia Brito; Mendes, Maria Fernanda; Brum, Doralina Guimarães; Glehn, Felipe Von.
Arq. neuropsiquiatr ; 79(11): 1049-1061, Nov. 2021. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1350135

RESUMO

ABSTRACT The Scientific Department of Neuroimmunology of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology (DCNI/ABN) and Brazilian Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis and Neuroimmunological Diseases (BCTRIMS) provide recommendations in this document for vaccination of the population with demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system (CNS) against infections in general and against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes COVID-19. We emphasize the seriousness of the current situation in view of the spread of COVID-19 in our country. Therefore, reference guides on vaccination for clinicians, patients, and public health authorities are particularly important to prevent some infectious diseases. The DCNI/ABN and BCTRIMS recommend that patients with CNS demyelinating diseases (e.g., MS and NMOSD) be continually monitored for updates to their vaccination schedule, especially at the beginning or before a change in treatment with a disease modifying drug (DMD). It is also important to note that vaccines are safe, and physicians should encourage their use in all patients. Clearly, special care should be taken when live attenuated viruses are involved. Finally, it is important for physicians to verify which DMD the patient is receiving and when the last dose was taken, as each drug may affect the induction of immune response differently.


RESUMO O DC de Neuroimunologia da ABN e o BCTRIMS trazem, nesse documento, as recomendações sobre vacinação da população com doenças desmielinizantes do sistema nervoso central (SNC) contra infecções em geral e contra o coronavírus da síndrome respiratória aguda grave 2 (SARS-CoV-2), causador da COVID-19. Destaca-se a gravidade do atual momento frente ao avanço da COVID-19 em nosso País, o que torna mais evidente e importante a criação de guia de referência para orientação aos médicos, pacientes e autoridades de saúde pública quanto à vacinação, meio efetivo e seguro no controle de determinadas doenças infecciosa. O DCNI/ABN e o BCTRIMS recomendam que os pacientes com doenças desmielinizantes do SNC (ex., EM e NMOSD) sejam constantemente monitorados, quanto a atualização do seu calendário vacinal, especialmente, no início ou antes da mudança do tratamento com uma droga modificadora de doença (DMD). É importante também salientar que as vacinas são seguras e os médicos devem estimular o seu uso em todos os pacientes. Evidentemente, deve ser dada especial atenção às vacinas com vírus vivos atenuados. Por fim, é importante que os médicos verifiquem qual DMD o paciente está em uso e quando foi feita a sua última dose, pois cada fármaco pode interagir de forma diferente com a indução da resposta imune.


Assuntos
Humanos , COVID-19 , Esclerose Múltipla/tratamento farmacológico , Neurologia , Sistema Nervoso Central , Vacinação , SARS-CoV-2
7.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34446434

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To describe the clinical features and disease outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). METHODS: The Neuroimmunology Brazilian Study Group has set up the report of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV2) cases in patients with NMOSD (pwNMOSD) using a designed web-based case report form. All neuroimmunology outpatient centers and individual neurologists were invited to register their patients across the country. Data collected between March 19 and July 25, 2020, were uploaded at the REDONE.br platform. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) NMOSD diagnosis according to the 2015 International Panel Criteria and (2) confirmed SARS-CoV2 infection (reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction or serology) or clinical suspicion of COVID-19, diagnosed according to Center for Disease Control / Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CDC/CSTE) case definition. Demographic and NMOSD-related clinical data, comorbidities, disease-modifying therapy (DMT), COVID-19 clinical features, and severity were described. RESULTS: Among the 2,061 pwNMOSD followed up by Brazilian neurologists involved on the registry of COVID-19 in pwNMOSD at the REDONE.br platform, 34 patients (29 women) aged 37 years (range 8-77), with disease onset at 31 years (range 4-69) and disease duration of 6 years (range 0.2-20.5), developed COVID-19 (18 confirmed and 16 probable cases). Most patients exhibited mild disease, being treated at home (77%); 4 patients required admission at intensive care units (severe cases); and 1 patient died. Five of 34 (15%) presented neurologic manifestations (relapse or pseudoexacerbation) during or after SARS-CoV2 infection. DISCUSSION: Most NMOSD patients with COVID-19 presented mild disease forms. However, pwNMOSD had much higher odds of hospitalization and intensive care unit admission comparing with the general Brazilian population. The frequency of death was not clearly different. NMOSD disability, DMT type, and comorbidities were not associated with COVID-19 outcome. SARS-CoV2 infection was demonstrated as a risk factor for NMOSD relapses. Collaborative studies using shared NMOSD data are needed to suitably define factors related to COVID-19 severity and neurologic manifestations.


Assuntos
COVID-19/fisiopatologia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Neuromielite Óptica/fisiopatologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Brasil/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/terapia , Criança , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neuromielite Óptica/tratamento farmacológico , Neuromielite Óptica/epidemiologia , Recidiva , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adulto Jovem
8.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 55: 103146, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34332456

RESUMO

Some drugs and medications can precipitate immune system deregulations, which might be confused with recurrent demyelinating diseases, such as multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMO), exacerbations of an existing disease, neoplastic lesions or other conditions. In this narrative review we describe some of the most relevant drugs and medications associated with iatrogenic demyelination. The anthelminthic agent levamisole is a frequent cocaine adulterant and can precipitate an exacerbated immune response attacking the central nervous system (CNS). High-efficacy multiple sclerosis (MS) drugs might induce a selective CNS immunosuppression, making it susceptible for opportunistic infections that course with demyelination, such as progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Sometimes, the interruption of a high-efficacy drug to treat MS can induce a rapid CNS reentry of lymphocytes, exacerbating demyelinating processes and triggering rebound syndromes. Furthermore, selective cytokines inhibition, such as anti-TNFα agents, might induce an imbalance between cell death and proliferation inducing a paradoxical increase of CNS tumor necrosis factor (TNF), affecting the activity of lymphocytes, microglia and macrophages, triggering aberrant inflammation and demyelination. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are a new class of antineoplastic drugs that enhance the immune response against tumor cells by an upregulation of T-cell activity. However, this hyperactivation of the immune system might be associated with induction of unwanted autoimmune responses. In this paper we review the risk factors, the possible pathological mechanisms and the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of these drug-related demyelinating syndromes.


Assuntos
Esclerose Múltipla , Neuromielite Óptica , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Esclerose Múltipla/diagnóstico por imagem , Esclerose Múltipla/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores de Risco , Síndrome
9.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 48: 102702, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33360914

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 pandemic has changed the way to manage MS and NMOSD, not only concerning treatment, but also regarding social distance and the increasing use of telemedicine (TM) to minimize the risk of infection. Currently, there is no data regarding TM among MS and NMOSD South American experts. OBJECTIVE: To investigate TM experiences from South American MS and/or NMOSD experts in the follow-up of their patients focusing on TM. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed. 141 MS and/or NMOSD experts from Argentina, Chile, Colombia and Brazil were invited to answer an web-based survey. RESULTS: A total of 129 (91.48 %) experts completed the survey. Only 19.4% had experience in TM previous COVID-19 pandemic, while 79.8% are currently using TM, most using video call (52.3%). Using TM, 44.1% of the experts were able to perform neurological examination, 85.6% believed to be able to identify a relapse, 48.6% use Patient Determined Disease Steps and 38.7% kept using the conventional Expanded Disability Status Scale. CONCLUSION: Our survey demonstrates preparedness and responsiveness among South American MS and/or NMOSD experts.  Despite scarce prior TM experience, most experts felt confident to use TM as a new tool for monitoring their patients.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Esclerose Múltipla/terapia , Neurologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Neuromielite Óptica/terapia , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Telemedicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Argentina , Brasil , Chile , Colômbia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
10.
Arq Neuropsiquiatr ; 78(7): 430-439, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32609290

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic poses a potential threat to patients with autoimmune disorders, including multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Such patients are usually treated with immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive agents, which may tamper with the organism's normal response to infections. Currently, no consensus has been reached on how to manage MS and NMOSD patients during the pandemic. OBJECTIVE: To discuss strategies to manage those patients. METHODS: We focus on how to 1) reduce COVID-19 infection risk, such as social distancing, telemedicine, and wider interval between laboratory testing/imaging; 2) manage relapses, such as avoiding treatment of mild relapse and using oral steroids; 3) manage disease-modifying therapies, such as preference for drugs associated with lower infection risk (interferons, glatiramer, teriflunomide, and natalizumab) and extended-interval dosing of natalizumab, when safe; 4) individualize the chosen MS induction-therapy (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, alemtuzumab, and cladribine); 5) manage NMOSD preventive therapies, including initial therapy selection and current treatment maintenance; 6) manage MS/NMOSD patients infected with COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: In the future, real-world case series of MS/NMOSD patients infected with COVID-19 will help us define the best management strategies. For the time being, we rely on expert experience and guidance.


Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Coronavirus , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Esclerose Múltipla/tratamento farmacológico , Neuromielite Óptica/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , China/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Suscetibilidade a Doenças , Humanos , Fatores Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Paciente para o Profissional/prevenção & controle , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Profissional para o Paciente/prevenção & controle , Esclerose Múltipla/diagnóstico , Neuromielite Óptica/diagnóstico , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Risco , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicina
11.
Arq. neuropsiquiatr ; 78(7): 430-439, July 2020. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1131732

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Background: The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic poses a potential threat to patients with autoimmune disorders, including multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Such patients are usually treated with immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive agents, which may tamper with the organism's normal response to infections. Currently, no consensus has been reached on how to manage MS and NMOSD patients during the pandemic. Objective: To discuss strategies to manage those patients. Methods: We focus on how to 1) reduce COVID-19 infection risk, such as social distancing, telemedicine, and wider interval between laboratory testing/imaging; 2) manage relapses, such as avoiding treatment of mild relapse and using oral steroids; 3) manage disease-modifying therapies, such as preference for drugs associated with lower infection risk (interferons, glatiramer, teriflunomide, and natalizumab) and extended-interval dosing of natalizumab, when safe; 4) individualize the chosen MS induction-therapy (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, alemtuzumab, and cladribine); 5) manage NMOSD preventive therapies, including initial therapy selection and current treatment maintenance; 6) manage MS/NMOSD patients infected with COVID-19. Conclusions: In the future, real-world case series of MS/NMOSD patients infected with COVID-19 will help us define the best management strategies. For the time being, we rely on expert experience and guidance.


RESUMO Introdução: A mais recente pandemia causada pelo coronavírus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19, do inglês coronavirus disease 2019) representa uma ameaça potencial para pacientes com doenças autoimunes, incluindo esclerose múltipla (EM) e transtorno do espectro de neuromielite óptica (NMOSD, do inglês neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders). Esses pacientes são geralmente tratados com medicamentos imunomoduladores ou imunossupressores que podem alterar a resposta normal do organismo a infecções. Até o momento, não há consenso sobre como o manejo dos pacientes com EM e NMOSD deve ser realizado durante a pandemia. Objetivo: Discutir estratégias para manejar esses pacientes. Métodos: Focamos em como 1) reduzir o risco de infecção por COVID-19, como distanciamento social, telemedicina e exames laboratoriais e de imagem em intervalos mais amplos; 2) manejo de surtos, incluindo evitar tratamento de surto leve e uso de corticoide oral; 3) gerenciar terapias modificadoras de doença, como a preferência por medicamentos associados a menor risco de infecção (interferons, glatirâmer, teriflunomida e natalizumabe) e infusão em intervalo estendido de natalizumabe, quando seguro; 4) individualizar a escolha da terapia de indução para EM (anticorpos monoclonais anti-CD20, alentuzumabe e cladribina); 5) manejar terapias preventivas de NMOSD, incluindo seleção inicial de terapia e manutenção do tratamento atual; 6) manejar pacientes com EM/NMOSD que foram infectados por COVID-19. Conclusão: No futuro, séries de casos de pacientes com MS/NMOSD infectados com COVID-19 nos ajudará a definir as melhores estratégias de manejo. Por enquanto, contamos com a experiência e orientação especializadas.


Assuntos
Humanos , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Neuromielite Óptica/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Coronavirus , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Esclerose Múltipla/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , China/epidemiologia , Risco , Neuromielite Óptica/diagnóstico , Telemedicina , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Profissional para o Paciente/prevenção & controle , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Paciente para o Profissional/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Coronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Suscetibilidade a Doenças , Pandemias , Betacoronavirus , Fatores Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Esclerose Múltipla/diagnóstico
12.
Preprint em Inglês | SciELO Preprints | ID: pps-715

RESUMO

Background: The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic poses a potential threat to patients with autoimmune disorders, including multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Such patients are usually treated with immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive agents, which may tamper with the organism's normal response to infections. Currently, no consensus has been reached on how to manage MS and NMOSD patients during the pandemic. Objective: To discuss strategies to manage those patients. Methods: We focus on how to 1) reduce COVID-19 infection risk, such as social distancing, telemedicine, and wider interval between laboratory testing/imaging; 2) manage relapses, such as avoiding treatment of mild relapse and using oral steroids; 3) manage disease-modifying therapies, such as preference for drugs associated with lower infection risk (interferons, glatiramer, teriflunomide, and natalizumab) and extended-interval dosing of natalizumab, when safe; 4) individualize the chosen MS induction-therapy (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, alemtuzumab, and cladribine); 5) manage NMOSD preventive therapies, including initial therapy selection and current treatment maintenance; 6) manage MS/NMOSD patients infected with COVID-19. Conclusions: In the future, real-world case series of MS/NMOSD patients infected with COVID-19 will help us define the best management strategies. For the time being, we rely on expert experience and guidance.


Introdução: A mais recente pandemia causada pelo coronavírus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19, do inglês coronavirus disease 2019) representa uma ameaça potencial para pacientes com doenças autoimunes, incluindo esclerose múltipla (EM) e transtorno do espectro de neuromielite óptica (NMOSD, do inglês neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders). Esses pacientes são geralmente tratados com medicamentos imunomoduladores ou imunossupressores que podem alterar a resposta normal do organismo a infecções. Até o momento, não há consenso sobre como o manejo dos pacientes com EM e NMOSD deve ser realizado durante a pandemia. Objetivo: Discutir estratégias para manejar esses pacientes. Métodos: Focamos em como 1) reduzir o risco de infecção por COVID-19, como distanciamento social, telemedicina e exames laboratoriais e de imagem em intervalos mais amplos; 2) manejo de surtos, incluindo evitar tratamento de surto leve e uso de corticoide oral; 3) gerenciar terapias modificadoras de doença, como a preferência por medicamentos associados a menor risco de infecção (interferons, glatirâmer, teriflunomida e natalizumabe) e infusão em intervalo estendido de natalizumabe, quando seguro; 4) individualizar a escolha da terapia de indução para EM (anticorpos monoclonais anti-CD20, alentuzumabe e cladribina); 5) manejar terapias preventivas de NMOSD, incluindo seleção inicial de terapia e manutenção do tratamento atual; 6) manejar pacientes com EM/NMOSD que foram infectados por COVID-19. Conclusão: No futuro, séries de casos de pacientes com MS/NMOSD infectados com COVID-19 nos ajudará a definir as melhores estratégias de manejo. Por enquanto, contamos com a experiência e orientação especializadas.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...