Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rev Med Chil ; 147(3): 330-333, 2019 Mar.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31344170

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pharmacological treatment improves survival in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. The use of sacubutril/valsartan and ivabradine has been recently approved and incorporated in the latest guidelines. AIM: To identify candidates eligible for these therapies among patients treated in a heart failure clinic, considering the inclusion criteria for the PARADIGM-HF and SHIFT trials. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study on 158 patients aged 62 ± 11 years (67% male) with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, with at least three months of follow-up and without decompensation. The percentage of patients complying for the inclusion criteria for the PARADIGM-HF y SHIFT trials was determined. RESULTS: In 37%, the etiology of heart failure was ischemic, 49% were in functional class I, their ejection fraction was 33 ± 11% and their median Pro-brain natriuretic peptide was 800 pg/mL. Ninety five percent were treated with vasodilators, 97% with beta-blockers and 82% with aldosterone antagonists. Using PARADIGM-HF and SHIFT criteria, 11 patients (7%) were eligible for sacubitril / valsartan and 21 patients (13.3%) for ivabradine. Among the main causes of non-eligibility for sacubitril / valsartan were being functional class I (48.7%) and not achieving a stable dose of enalapril ≥ 20 mg / day or losartan ≥ 100 mg / day (24.7%). In the case of ivabradine, apart from those in functional class I, the absence of sinus rhythm and a heart rate < 70 / min when receiving a maximal tolerated dose of beta-blockers, were present in 22%. CONCLUSIONS: A low percentage of our patients were eligible for these therapies. Among the causes that explain these results were clinical stability, a high percentage of patients in functional class I and being in a disease modifying treatment.


Assuntos
Aminobutiratos/administração & dosagem , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/administração & dosagem , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administração & dosagem , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Ivabradina/administração & dosagem , Tetrazóis/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Compostos de Bifenilo , Estudos Transversais , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Seleção de Pacientes , Valsartana
2.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 147(3): 330-333, mar. 2019. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: biblio-1043154

RESUMO

Background: Pharmacological treatment improves survival in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. The use of sacubutril/valsartan and ivabradine has been recently approved and incorporated in the latest guidelines. Aim: To identify candidates eligible for these therapies among patients treated in a heart failure clinic, considering the inclusion criteria for the PARADIGM-HF and SHIFT trials. Material and Methods: Cross-sectional study on 158 patients aged 62 ± 11 years (67% male) with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, with at least three months of follow-up and without decompensation. The percentage of patients complying for the inclusion criteria for the PARADIGM-HF y SHIFT trials was determined. Results: In 37%, the etiology of heart failure was ischemic, 49% were in functional class I, their ejection fraction was 33 ± 11% and their median Pro-brain natriuretic peptide was 800 pg/mL. Ninety five percent were treated with vasodilators, 97% with beta-blockers and 82% with aldosterone antagonists. Using PARADIGM-HF and SHIFT criteria, 11 patients (7%) were eligible for sacubitril / valsartan and 21 patients (13.3%) for ivabradine. Among the main causes of non-eligibility for sacubitril / valsartan were being functional class I (48.7%) and not achieving a stable dose of enalapril ≥ 20 mg / day or losartan ≥ 100 mg / day (24.7%). In the case of ivabradine, apart from those in functional class I, the absence of sinus rhythm and a heart rate < 70 / min when receiving a maximal tolerated dose of beta-blockers, were present in 22%. Conclusions: A low percentage of our patients were eligible for these therapies. Among the causes that explain these results were clinical stability, a high percentage of patients in functional class I and being in a disease modifying treatment.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Tetrazóis/administração & dosagem , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administração & dosagem , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/administração & dosagem , Ivabradina/administração & dosagem , Aminobutiratos/administração & dosagem , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Transversais , Seleção de Pacientes , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Combinação de Medicamentos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA