[Endovascular renal nerve ablation as a treatment for resistant hypertension]. / La dénervation rénale endovasculaire dans le traitement de l'hypertension artérielle résistante.

Radiofrequency-induced renal ablation is a non-pharmacologic therapeutic approach for the treatment of essential resistant hypertension, with a stable blood pressure lowering effect. However, data from published studies cannot conclude yet on the long-term efficacy and safety of the procedure. Therefore, the various techniques of renal nerve ablation (radiofrequency, cryoablation, ultrasounds) need further evaluation in clinical research trials. According to recent national and international recommendations, renal ablation should be reserved for patients with essential resistant hypertension.

Catheter-based radiofrequency renal-nerve ablation in patients with resistant hypertension.

This review aims to describe the role and the results of catheter-based renal nerve ablation for the treatment of resistant hypertension. Despite the availability of multiple classes of orally active antihypertensive treatments, resistant hypertension remains an important public health issue in 2012 due to its prevalence and association with target-organ damage and poor prognosis. The failure of purely pharmacological approaches to treat resistant hypertension has stimulated interest in invasive device-based treatments based on old concepts. In the absence of orally active antihypertensive agents, patients with severe and complicated hypertension were widely treated by surgical denervation of the kidney until the 1960s, but this approach was associated with a high incidence of severe adverse events and a high mortality rate. A new catheter system using radiofrequency energy has been developed, allowing an endovascular approach to renal denervation and providing patients with resistant hypertension with a new therapeutic option that is less invasive than surgery and can be performed rapidly under local anaesthesia. To date, this technique has been evaluated only in open-label trials including small numbers of highly selected resistant hypertensive patients with suitable renal artery anatomy. The available evidence suggests a favourable blood pressure-lowering effect in the short term (6 months) and a low incidence of immediate local and endovascular complications. This follow-up period is, however, too short for the detection of rare or late-onset adverse events. For the time being, the benefit/risk ratio of this technique remains to be evaluated, precluding its uncontrolled and widespread use in routine practice.

[Endocrine hypertension]. / Hypertension artérielle endocrine.

Endocrine hypertension represents more than half of the causes of secondary hypertension. This entity encompasses several diseases including primary aldosteronism, paraganglioma/pheochromocytoma and Cushing's syndrome. The screening of endocrine hypertension should be performed in all the patients presenting with: (1) a resistant hypertension; (2) a severe hypertension; (3) the coexistence of hypertension with an adrenal adenoma, clinical or biological abnormalities. Clinical signs and symptoms, whenever present, lack specificity, especially for primary aldosteronism where hypertension is usually the unique symptom. Screening is performed by the measurement of several hormones and by a tomodensitometry to study the morphology of the adrenals: the presence of a solitary or multiples adenomas, or hyperplasia. Pheochromocytoma and Cushing's syndrome are very uncommon and should be referred to specialized centres. Primary aldosteronism is a frequent cause of secondary hypertension. Once the diagnosis is obtained, it is essential to differentiate whether it is a surgically correctable form or not. The patients with a bilateral adrenal hyperplasia can be managed effectively by mineralocorticoids receptor antagonist. The adrenalectomy will cure or improve hypertension for the majority of the patients with a lateralized secretion of aldosterone. The diagnosis and the treatment of these disorders can be challenging. However, the diagnosis of endocrine hypertension allows diagnosing surgical correctable form of hypertension, which is not possible in essential hypertension.

[From clinical observation to assessment of practices: guidelines for hypertension management]. / De l'observation clinique à l'évaluation des pratiques : les recommandations pour la prise en charge de l'hypertension artérielle.

Arterial hypertension is highly prevalent and one of the main risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. It has been demonstrated that antihypertensive treatment is effective to prevent cardiovascular events. Advances have been made in this field for 50 years and the knowledge and management of hypertension has been modified continuously with increase of related costs. Therefore hypertension is one of the favorite themes for guidelines and indeed several guidelines have been published on this theme regularly. Despite this, a high percentage of treated hypertensive patients remains uncontrolled. Several reasons have been raised for not implementing guidelines: these guidelines are often little-known because of their large number and their bad distribution. A systematic analysis of the last guidelines showed also they were structurally different with a small percentage of identical references and they provided sometimes different practical conclusions. Finally, clinical inertia is partly responsible for these insufficient results. As the current form of the guidelines has a limited impact on the medical practice, we should find other methods to improve their implementation.

[Prevalence and mechanism of masked hypertension: the ol'mesures survey]. / Prevalence et mécanismes de l'hypertension masquée. Enquête OL'MESURES.

RATIONALE: Masked hypertension (MH) and uncontrolled hypertension (UCH) have both bad prognosis. The influence of measurement circumstances on MH prevalence and reproducibility are little known. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence and reproducibility of MH after excluding confusing factors [method and time of blood pressure (BP) measurement, antihypertensive treatment] by a standardization procedure. METHODS: 2189 hypertensive patients (61+/- 12 years, men 57%) having been treated in monotherapy by an angiotensin II receptor inhibitor for at least 8 weeks Were evaluated in a French multicenter prospective observational survey. Three BP successive office measurements were performed by the GPs during 2 visits (V) at similar times 13 +/- 9 days apart (BP: V1 149 +/- 19 / 85 +/- 11 mmHg, V2 145 +/- 19/83 +/- 11 mmHg) and home BP self-measurements (HBPM) were performed morning and evening for 3 consecutive days (HBPM morning + evening : n=18 +/- 1; 142 +/- 16/81 +/- 9 mmHg) and at the time of the visit (daytime HBPM: n=9 +/- 1; 140 +/- 16/80 +/- 10 mmHg) by the patients (Omron-705CP). RESULTS: [table: see text]. CONCLUSION: the observed MH prevalence is similar to previous published studies and is independent of: treatment, BP measurement methods, measurements frequency and HBPM time but it depends on office BP values. Consequently, its reproducibility is directly dependent of the quality of office BP measurements.

Detection of masked hypertension by home blood pressure measurement: is the number of measurements an important issue?

BACKGROUND: Office blood pressure (OBP) and home blood pressure (HBP) enable the identification of patients with masked hypertension. Masked hypertension is defined by normal OBP and high HBP and is known as a pejorative cardiovascular risk factor. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate in the SHEAF study the influence of the number of office or home blood pressure measurements on the classification of patients as masked hypertensives. METHODS: Patients with OBP <140/90 mmHg (mean of six values: three measurements at two separate visits, V1 and V2) and HBP >135/85 mmHg (mean of all valid measurements performed over a 4-day period) were the masked hypertensive reference group. The consistency of the classification was evaluated by using five definitions of HBP values (mean of the 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15 first measurements) and two definitions of OBP values (mean of three measurements at V1 and mean of three measurements at V2). RESULTS: Among the 4939 treated hypertensives included in the SHEAF study, 463 (9.4%) were classified as masked hypertensives (reference group). By decreasing the number of office or home measurements, the prevalence of masked hypertension ranged from 8.9-12.1%. The sensitivity of the classification ranged from 94-69% therefore 6-31% of the masked hypertensives were not detected. The specificity ranged from 98-94% therefore 1-6% of patients were wrongly classified as masked hypertensives. CONCLUSION: A limited number of home and office BP measurements allowed the detection of masked hypertension with a high specificity and a low sensitivity. A sufficient number of measurements (three measurements at two visits for OBP and three measurements in the morning and in the evening over 2 days for HBP) are required to diagnose masked hypertension.

[Management of atherosclerotic renal artery stenoses]. / Prise en charge des sténoses athéroscléreuses des artères rénales.

Patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis may develop hypertension, recurrent pulmonary edema and chronic renal failure, but have a much higher risk of dying from stroke or myocardial infarction than of progressing to end-stage renal disease. Indeed, atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis typically occurs in high risk patients with coexistent vascular disease elsewhere. Recent controlled trials comparing medication to revascularization have shown that only a minority of such patients can expect hypertension cure, whereas the results of trials designed to document the ability of revascularization to prevent progressive renal failure are not yet available. Revascularization should be undertaken in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis and resistant hypertension or heart failure, and probably in those with rapidly deteriorating renal function or with an increase in plasma creatinine levels during angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition, especially if their renal resistance--index before revascularization is less than 80. With or without revascularization, medical therapy using antihypertensive agents, statins and aspirin is necessary in almost all cases.

[Arterial hypertension secondary to curable causes in adults]. / Hypertensions artérielles secondaires à des causes curables chez l'adulte.

EXTENSIVE AND COSTLY INVESTIGATIONS: Are not warranted in the vast majority of hypertensive patients. Characteristics identifying the patients at risk for secondary hypertension can be used to define the small percentage of patients with hypertension who require more extensive diagnostic testing and management of their condition. Exposure to certain medicines, foods or drugs may cause reversible rises in blood pressure. Renovascular and adrenal diseases cause curable forms of hypertension. IN MANY CASES, THE PATIENT'S HISTORY: Examination and simple tests can detect such exposures and disorders. Checking for secondary hypertension is therefore an early step required for the management of all patients with hypertension, provided it is based on clinical signs and inexpensive tests. This primary screening cannot exclude the possibility of renovascular or adrenal disease in a small number of asymptomatic patients. The risk of missing a diagnosis is acceptable provided that blood pressure is normalized by non-specific antihypertensive treatment. However, more extensive etiologic investigation is required in patients who subsequently develop resistant hypertension. This secondary screening requires imaging and biochemical tests that are not required for primary screening. CORRECTION OF THE CAUSES: Of secondary forms of hypertension may restore blood pressure to normal. The patient's age affects the reversibility of renovascular and adrenal hypertension after etiologic treatment: the younger the patient, the higher the probability of blood pressure normalization.

Is "isolated home" hypertension as opposed to "isolated office" hypertension a sign of greater cardiovascular risk?

BACKGROUND: The SHEAF (Self-Measurement of Blood Pressure at Home in the Elderly: Assessment and Follow-up) study is an observational study (from February 1998 to early 2002) designed to determine whether home blood pressure (BP) measurement has a greater cardiovascular prognostic value than office BP measurement among elderly (> or =60 years) French patients with hypertension. The objective of this present work is to describe the baseline characteristics of the treated patients in the SHEAF study from February 1998 to March 1999, placing special emphasis on "isolated office" and "isolated home" hypertension. METHODS: Baseline office BP measurement was assessed using a mercury sphygmomanometer. Home BP measurement was performed over a 4-day period. A 140/90-mm Hg threshold was chosen to define office hypertension, and a 135/85-mm Hg threshold to define home hypertension. RESULTS: Of the 5211 hypertensive patients in the SHEAF study with a valid home BP measurement, 4939 received treatment with at least 1 antihypertensive drug. Patients with isolated office hypertension represented 12.5% of this population, while patients with isolated home hypertension represented 10.8%. The characteristics of the patients with isolated office hypertension were similar to those of patients with controlled hypertension. However, patients with isolated office hypertension had fewer previous cardiovascular complications. In contrast, rates of cardiovascular risk factors and history of cardiovascular disease in patients with isolated home hypertension resembled those in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective analysis suggests that patients with isolated home hypertension belong to a high-risk subgroup. The 3-year follow-up of these patients will provide prospective data about the cardiovascular prognosis of these subgroups.

Is primary aldosteronism underdiagnosed in clinical practice?

1. Primary aldosteronism is a syndrome consisting of hypertension, suppressed renin activity or concentration and high aldosterone levels in plasma or urine. The main steps in diagnosis are the determination of renin and aldosterone levels, the demonstration of renin-aldosterone dissociation and discrimination between idiopathic hyperplasia and Conn's adenoma, with only Conn's adenoma amenable to surgery. 2. Patients with resistant hypertension and/or hypokalaemia should be screened for primary aldosteronism with simple, redundant hormonal tests. The aldosterone to renin ratio is a logical initial screening test, a high ratio demonstrating renin-aldosterone dissociation. Criteria for a high ratio should be determined in each laboratory. 3. In patients with documented primary aldosteronism, computed tomography scan and adrenal vein sampling help to distinguish between idiopathic hyperplasia and Conn's adenoma. 4. Patients with low renin hypertension, idiopathic hyperplasia and Conn's adenoma have overlapping values for plasma concentrations of potassium, renin and aldosterone and the aldosterone to renin ratio. Because primary aldosteronism subtypes are quantitative diseases, the true prevalence of primary aldosteronism cannot be defined. 5. The use of sensitive screening tests (e.g. aldosterone to renin ratio) gives a higher prevalence of diagnosed cases of primary aldosteronism, but not of surgically correctable forms. Therefore, there is no clinical evidence that primary aldosteronism is underdiagnosed. 6. There is a need for tests to predict the postoperative blood pressure outcome of surgery in subjects with Conn's adenoma.

Blood pressure levels, risk factors and antihypertensive treatments: lessons from the SHEAF study.

OBJECTIVES: The SHEAF study (Self measurement of blood pressure at Home in the Elderly: Assessment and Follow-up) is a 3-year prospective cohort study of French elderly (> or =60 years) hypertensive patients designed to assess whether home blood pressure (HBP) measurement provides additional prognostic information over office blood pressure (OBP) in terms of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. The objective of the present work is to describe the baseline data of the population enrolled in the SHEAF study with special emphasis on blood pressure control in treated hypertensives. METHODS: During the 2-week initial inclusion phase, baseline demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, antihypertensive treatments as well as office and home blood pressure were recorded. Baseline OBP was assessed using a mercury sphygmomanometer (three consecutive measurements during two visits performed 2 weeks apart). HBP was performed over a 4-day period (three consecutive measurements in the morning and in the evening). RESULTS: A total of 4939 (95%) of the 5211 patients included in the SHEAF study were treated with at least one antihypertensive drug. Their ages ranged from 60 to 99 years (mean age 70 +/- 7 years); 49% were men, 12% had a previous history of coronary artery disease, 14% diabetes and 43% a treated dyslipidaemia. A total of 45% of the treated patients received a single antihypertensive drug, 34% two drugs, 21% three drugs or more. Overall 23% of treated hypertensives were normalised at the doctor's office (systolic BP <140 mm Hg and diastolic BP <90 mm Hg) and 27% at home (home systolic BP <135 mm Hg and home diastolic BP <85 mm Hg). Poor blood pressure control was associated with age, an increasing presence of diabetes and prescription of several antihypertensives. The proportion of subjects with controlled blood pressure decrease with age from 26% (60-69 years) to 21% (> or =80 years). Blood pressure control of diabetic patients was particularly poor as only 19% had an OBP <140/90 mm Hg and 6% a blood pressure <130/85 mm Hg. The percentage of patients with controlled OBP decreased from 26% when receiving a single antihypertensive drug to 11% when receiving four antihypertensives or more. CONCLUSION: In the SHEAF study, less than one-third of the patients had an OBP adequately controlled thus confirming previous studies performed in younger populations. Presence of associated cardiovascular risk factors including diabetes did not give rise to a better blood pressure control. When blood pressure control was assessed using HBP measurement similar results were found. As the beneficial effect of antihypertensive treatment has been particularly well established in the elderly, the data of this study underlines the need for a closer and more rigorous management of elderly hypertensives.

[The feasibility of at-home self-monitoring blood pressure in elderly hypertensive patients]. / Faisabilité de l'automesure tensionnelle à domicile chez le sujet hypertendu âgé.

The goal of the SHEAF study is to determine whether self blood pressure measurement (SBPM) has a better cardiovascular prognostic value than office blood pressure (OBP) among French elderly (> or = 60 y) hypertensive patients (pts) followed-up by general practitioners. Baseline SBPM was performed over a 4-day period: every day a series of 3 consecutive measurements was requested in the morning (8:00 am) and in the evening (8:00 pm), using a validated device OMRON 705 CP. Measurements performed out of predefined morning and evening time (outside the 4:00-12:00 am range or the 4:00-12:00 pm range) were discarded as well as aberrant values. Pts were included in the study only if they exhibited at least 15 valid measurements with at least 6 in the morning and 6 in the evening. 5,649 pts were selected. 186 pts were excluded for age < 60 years. Thus SBPM analysis was performed for 5,463 pts: 2,687 men (49%) and 2,776 women (51%) aged 70 +/- 7 years. Only 252 pts (5%) were excluded for non valid SBPM (207 pts < 15 measurements, 106 pts < 6 measurements in the morning and 205 pts < 6 measurements in the evening). 5,211 pts (95%) with valid SBPM were included. The distribution of pts according to the number of measurements performed is the following: [table: see text] The number of measurements performed in the morning is highly related to the number of measurements performed in the evening. None of the following variables is significantly associated with the poor compliance of measurement protocol: age, gender, CV history, CV risk factors, hypertension duration. In a large cohort of elderly hypertensive living in the community, SBPM is easily performed both in the morning and in the evening by most of the pts. If the SHEAF study demonstrates the prognostic value of SBPM, this would provide the basis for the use of this measurement method by a majority of elderly hypertensives.

Comparison of nurse- and physician-determined clinic blood pressure levels in patients referred to a hypertension clinic: implications for subsequent management.

BACKGROUND: When measuring BP, the physician induces a transient pressor response triggered by an alarm reaction. This 'white-coat effect' can influence therapeutic decisions. Whether it depends on the characteristics of the physician has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To assess the 'white-coat effect' induced by several physicians in a large sample of patients, using the blood pressure measured by trained nurses as a reference. SETTING: Referral hypertension clinic. METHODS: Patients were selected for the study if they had been referred for the first time to the clinic and if they had had their supine systolic/diastolic blood pressure measured by a trained nurse (mean of the last two of three measurements taken every 1 min by an oscillometric device) and a physician (auscultatory method using a standard mercury sphygmomanometer). Physicians were included in the study provided they had seen at least 25 patients during the study period. The between-physician difference was assessed using linear regression analysis. Physician blood pressure was the dependent and nurse blood pressure was the independent variable. RESULTS: From 1 January 1997 to 15 September 1997, 1062 patients (50% male, aged 52 +/- 14 years), seen by 10 physicians (26-187 patients per physician) and one nurse were included for analysis. The mean systolic/diastolic blood pressure for physicians was 162 +/- 27/ 97 +/- 15 mmHg and that for the nurse was 155 +/- 24/ 88 +/- 14 mmHg. The nurse-physician differences were -6 mmHg (range -67 to +66) for systolic and -8 mmHg (-44 to +31) for diastolic blood pressures. Major differences were observed between individual physicians. Intercepts of the physician blood pressure versus nurse blood pressure relationship ranged from 0.1 -60.7 mmHg for systolic and from 13.3-55.3 mmHg for diastolic pressures. The slopes of this relationship differed less between physicians for systolic (0.72-1) than for diastolic pressures (0.56-0.97). There was no difference between the patients seen by physicians in patients' age, sex, tobacco consumption, anti-hypertensive treatment or target-organ damage. CONCLUSION: Large between-physician differences exist in the magnitude of the white-coat effect that cannot be explained by patient characteristics. Physicians should therefore not make any decisions based on blood pressure measured manually during a first encounter.

[Current aspects of arterial hypertension. Prognostic value of self-monitoring blood pressure measurements in aged hypertensive patients: a SHEAF study protocol]. / Actualités sur l'hypertension artérielle. Comment évaluer la valeur pronostique de l'automesure tensionnelle chez l'hypertendu âgé: protocole de l'étude SHEAF.

HOW TO MEASURE BLOOD PRESSURE: Studies conducted in large series have established the prognostic value of blood pressure measured by conventional methods. This measurement technique has however a certain number of limitations and alternative systems have been proposed, including self-monitoring methods. A preliminary study suggested that the prognostic value of self-monitoring blood pressure measurements would be superior to those obtained with conventional methods. These findings require confirmation. A LARGE SCALE STUDY: The primary objective of the SHEAF study is to determine the prognostic value of self-monitoring blood pressure measurements in terms of cardiovascular mortality in a population of hypertensive elderly subjects living in France. The study protocol projects to include 5,000 hypertensive patients, whether treated or not, aged 60 and over. Baseline pressures are to be measured by a physician using a mercury sphygmomanometer (3 successive measurements at 2 visits) and by the participants using a self-monitoring device in their home (3 measurements in the morning and evening for 4 consecutive days). The patients will be followed for 3 years and all cardiovascular events will be recorded, including: death, myocardial infarction, cerebral vascular events, transitory ischemic events, hospitalization for angina, episodes of angina, heart failure, angioplasy or coronary bypass. The results of this large-scale epidemiology study should be available in 2002. METHODOLOGICAL PRECAUTIONS: The SHEAF study will analyze the patient's usual blood pressures, whatever the treatment at study inclusion, rather than blood pressures observed after treatment withdrawal. Efforts will be made to limit the number of drop-outs.

Short-term effects of withdrawing angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy on home self-measured blood pressure in hypertensive patients.

The aim of this study was to compare blood pressure rise after interruption of two angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in hypertensive patients. After a 2-week placebo run-in period, hypertensive patients were treated with either trandolapril 2 mg once daily or perindopril 4 mg once daily for 4 weeks in a double-blind design. A placebo was then administered for 1 week. Three periods of 1-week home self-measured blood pressure (SMBP) were programmed: end of placebo run-in period, end of treatment period, and final withdrawal placebo period. Every day, three consecutive measurements were requested both in the evening and in the morning. Individual reversion to baseline BP level was studied in the subgroup of patients responding to therapy (evening diastolic SMBP decrease > or =6 mm Hg). The ratio (R) of mean post-drug DBP lowering (residual effect) over evening on-drug DBP lowering (full effect) was used to study reversion to baseline. Patients exhibiting a lower value than the median of this ratio were called Reverters, whereas others were called Nonreverters. One hundred-nineteen patients entered the analysis. During the treatment period, mean SMBP decreased significantly, from 150 +/- 14/97 +/- 7 mm Hg to 139 +/- 15/91 +/- 9 mm Hg (all P < .001). The on-drug BP level was similar in the evening in the two treatment groups. However, both systolic and diastolic morning SMBP levels were significantly lower in the trandolapril group. After drug discontinuation, the mean BP level significantly rose to 144 +/- 14/94 +/- 9 mm Hg (all P = .01) but remained lower than the baseline BP values (P = .003 for SBP and P = .002 for DBP). The post-drug BP level was significantly lower in the trandolapril group than in the perindopril group. Seventy-four patients were responders to therapy. In this subgroup, the median of the R ratio used to analyze reversion to baseline after drug discontinuation was 44%. Nonreverters were characterized by a sustained on-drug BP decrease, compared to Reverters. We therefore conclude that ACE inhibitor treatment withdrawal is accompanied by a rapid rise in BP (within 48 h), followed by a 5-day BP plateau that is lower than the initial level. Reverters to baseline after drug discontinuation were more likely to be insufficiently controlled during therapy, particularly in the morning. The longer duration of action of trandolapril was associated with a lower BP level during both the morning during the active treatment phase and the 1-week posttreatment phase.

[Renal involvement in essential arterial hypertension]. / L'atteinte rénale dans l'hypertension artérielle essentielle.

GENETIC DISEASE MODELS: A certain proportion of hypertension cases are due to renal disease. Recent advances in genetics has improved our knowledge of the pathophysiological mechanisms involved in certain rare diseases including apparent overproduction of mineralocorticoids, Liddle syndrome and Gitelman syndrome, and to hypothesize on the mechanism of primary hypertension. EFFECT ON PROGNOSIS: Onset of renal disease in hypertensive patients, whether expressed by proteinuria or the early stages of renal failure, worsens cardiovascular prognosis. FREQUENCY OF RENAL DISEASE: Renal disease is relatively rare in hypertensive patients, but as the general hypertensive population becomes older, there is a considerable rise in the prevalence of hypertensive renal disease as the underlying cause leading to dialysis. The risk of progressing to renal failure appears to be related to the level of the blood pressure, especially systolic pressure, at disease onset. Hypertension black subjects have a higher risk of developing chronic renal failure. THERAPEUTIC BENEFIT: Several studies have shown that lowering blood pressure with antihypertensive drugs lowers the risk progressing with primary hypertension.