Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk ; 23(1): e19-e26, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36396583

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Ruxolitinib is widely used in myelofibrosis (MF). However, some patients do not optimally respond and require more efficacious treatment. Our analysis aimed to establish predictors of ruxolitinib response. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We designed a multicenter, retrospective analysis of the efficacy of ruxolitinib treatment in patients with MF in 15 Polish hematology centers. As responses to ruxolitinib occur within the first 6 months, we used this point to evaluate the efficacy of treatment. Symptoms response was defined as ≥50% reduction of the MF constitutional symptoms assessed by Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score (MPN-SAF TSS). Spleen response was defined as ≥50% reduction of the difference between the spleen's baseline length and the upper limit norm measured by ultrasonography. RESULTS: 320 MF patients were enrolled. At 6 months of therapy, the spleen response was detected in 140 (50%) patients, and symptoms response in 241 patients (76%). Multivariable analysis identified leukocytosis <25 G/L (OR 2.06, 95%CI: 1.12-3.88, P = .0200), and reticulin fibrosis MF 1 (OR 2.22, 95%CI: 1.11-4.46, P = .0249) contributed to better spleen response. The time interval between MF diagnosis and ruxolitinib administration shorter than 3 months, and platelets ≥150 G/L (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.01-2.83, P = .0466) influenced symptoms response. CONCLUSION: Establishing predictive factors for ruxolitinib response is particularly important given the potential for new therapies in MF. In patients with a low likelihood of responding to ruxolitinib, using other JAK inhibitors or adding a drug with a different mechanism of action to ruxolitinib may be of clinical benefit.


Assuntos
Leucemia , Mielofibrose Primária , Humanos , Adulto , Mielofibrose Primária/diagnóstico , Mielofibrose Primária/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Polônia , Sistema de Registros
2.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 61(3): 588-603, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31661339

RESUMO

We present the results of a prospective, non-randomized phase 2 trial in which 253 AML patients (pts) under 60 years old received DAC (Daunorubicin + AraC + Cladribine) as first induction followed by CLAM (Cladribine + AraC + Mitoxantrone) as early second induction on day 16 based on bone marrow (BM) blasts on day 14 (D14). The CR/CRi rate after a single course of DAC was 83% for pts with D14 BM blasts less than 10%. Forty-six pts had >10% BM blasts on D14, of whom 35 received CLAM with rates of CR/CRi 60% and early death (ED) 23%. The remaining 11 pts were not fit to receive CLAM, with rates of CR/CRi 28%, PR 18%, and ED 18%. Median OS was 7.2 versus 7.5 months, respectively. The overall CR/CRi rate was 77% after the first induction, with final CR/CRi rate 80% after DAC reinduction for pts who achieved PR with initial DAC course. CLAM used as early second induction might improve CR/CRi rates for younger AML pts with poor early response to DAC induction, but may be associated with higher mortality.


Assuntos
Cladribina , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Cladribina/uso terapêutico , Citarabina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mitoxantrona/uso terapêutico , Polônia , Estudos Prospectivos , Indução de Remissão
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...