Quantifying time from last dose: do direct oral anticoagulant assays correlate with patient's reported last dose.

INTRODUCTION: In the absence of a patient's last direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) dose time, best practice regarding preoperative DOAC cessation remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate, in a real-life patient cohort, if there was an association between subjective patient recall and objective DOAC assay titre. METHODS/MATERIALS: A multicentre cohort study of consecutive surgical inpatients was conducted. DOAC assays were 'expected' if they satisfied both time and titre-based guidelines. RESULTS: Patient-recalled last dose and DOAC assay was available in 285 individuals. DOAC assay titres correlated strongly with the expected levels based on a patient's reported last dose time(rho = 0.70, P value < 0.0001). However, underweight (<50 kg; P  = 0.0339) and elderly (>80 years; P  = 0.0134) were more likely to have an unexpectedly high assay titre. CONCLUSIONS: A significant portion (∼25%) of patients had unexpected DOAC titres. DOAC levels can be clinically impactful in a significant percentage of patients, particularly in elderly and/or underweight.

Impact of perioperative direct oral anticoagulant assays: a multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: There is little evidence to guide the perioperative management of patients on a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) in the absence of a last known dose. Quantitative serum titers may be ordered, but there is little evidence supporting this. AIMS: This multi-center retrospective cohort study of consecutive surgical in-patients with a DOAC assay, performed over a five-year period, aimed to characterize preoperative DOAC assay orders and their impact on perioperative outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients prescribed regular DOAC (both prophylactic and therapeutic dosing) with a preoperative DOAC assay were included. The DOAC assay titer was evaluated against endpoints. Further, patients with an assay were compared against anticoagulated patients who did not receive a preoperative DOAC assay. The primary endpoint was major bleeding. Secondary endpoints included perioperative hemoglobin change, blood transfusions, idarucizumab or prothrombin complex concentrate administration, postoperative thrombosis, in-hospital mortality and reoperation. Adjusted and unadjusted linear regression models were used for continuous data. Binary logistic models were performed for dichotomous outcomes. RESULTS: 1065 patients were included, 232 had preoperative assays. Assays were ordered most commonly by Spinal (11.9%), Orthopedics (15.4%), and Neurosurgery (19.4%). For every 10 ng/ml increase in titer, the hemoglobin decreases by 0.5066 g/L and the odds of a preoperative reversal increases by 13%. Compared to those without an assay, patients with preoperative DOAC assays had odds 1.44× higher for major bleeding, 2.98× higher for in-hospital mortality and 16.3× higher for receiving anticoagulant reversal. CONCLUSION: A preoperative DOAC assay order was associated with worse outcomes despite increased reversal administration. However, the DOAC assay titer can reflect the patient's likelihood of bleeding.

Drug Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism in the Elderly.

Half of all patients with acute venous thromboembolism are aged over 70 years; they then face the added hazard of an age-related increase in the incidence of major bleeding. This makes it even more important to weigh the balance of benefit and risk when considering anticoagulant treatment and treatment duration. Traditional treatment with a heparin (usually low molecular weight) followed by a vitamin K antagonist such as warfarin is effective but is often complicated, especially in the elderly. The direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs), i.e. the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and the factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban, are given in fixed doses, do not need laboratory monitoring, have fewer drug-drug interactions and are therefore much easier to take. Randomised trials, their meta-analyses and 'real-world' data indicate the DOACs are no less effective than warfarin (are non-inferior) and probably cause less major bleeding (especially intracranial). It seems the relative safety of DOACs extends to age above 65 or 70 years, although bleeding becomes more likely regardless of the chosen anticoagulant. Renal impairment, comorbidities (especially cancer) and interventions are special hazards. Ways to minimise bleeding include patient selection and follow-up, education about venous thromboembolism, anticoagulants, drug interactions, regular checks on adherence and avoiding needlessly prolonged treatment. The relatively short circulating half-lives of DOACs mean that time, local measures and supportive care are the main response to major bleeding. They also simplify the management of invasive interventions. An antidote for dabigatran, idarucizumab, was recently approved by regulators, and a general antidote for factor Xa inhibitors is in advanced development.

Pleural drainage after transthoracic esophagectomy: experience with a vacuum system.

Conventional pleural cavity drainage after esophagectomy involves one to two large-bore drainage tubes connected to underwater bottles. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of a small mobile vacuum drainage system. Out of 173 patients who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy, 167 (97%) had the vacuum drain successfully placed at the end of the operation. Of those, use of the vacuum drain was uneventful for 131 until its removal (78%). Air leaks necessitating connection to underwater drainage occurred in 34 patients (20%), but in 26 of them this was only temporary. Overall success was therefore achieved in 157 patients (94%). Median in-situ placement of the vacuum drain was 4 days, and 85% of patients had their drains removed by the seventh postoperative day. The presence of lung adhesions significantly increased the need for underwater drainage. Postoperative outcomes were no different from a historical cohort with conventional underwater drainage. No drain-related complications were reported. The vacuum drain is an alternative to the conventional, large-bore, chest tube system after transthoracic esophagectomy.