Short-term outcome after open-heart surgery for severe chronic rheumatic heart disease in a low-income country, with comparison with an historical control group: an observational study.

OBJECTIVES: Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is a major burden in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Cardiac surgery is the only curative treatment. Little is known about patients with severe chronic RHD operated in LMICs, and challenges regarding postoperative follow-up are an important issue. At Tikur Anbessa Specialised Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, we aimed to evaluate the course and 12-month outcome of patients with severe chronic RHD who received open-heart surgery, as compared with the natural course of controls waiting for surgery and undergoing only medical treatment. METHODS: Clinical data and outcome measures were registered in 46 patients operated during five missions from March 2016 to November 2019, and compared with the first-year course in a cohort of 49 controls from the same hospital's waiting list for surgery. Adverse events were death or complications such as stroke, other thromboembolic events, bleeding, hospitalisation for heart failure and infectious endocarditis. RESULTS: Survival at 12 months was 89% and survival free from complications was 80% in the surgical group. Despite undergoing open-heart surgery, with its inherent risks, outcome measures of the surgical group were non-inferior to the natural course of the control group in the first year after inclusion on the waiting list (p≥0.45). All except six surgical patients were in New York Heart Association class I after 12 months and 84% had resumed working. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac surgery for severe chronic RHD is feasible in LMICs if the service is structured and planned. Rates of survival and survival free from complications were similar to those of controls at 12 months. Functional level and resumption of work were high in the surgical group. Whether the patients who underwent cardiac surgery will have better long-term prognosis, in line with what is known in high-income countries, needs to be evaluated in future studies.

Acute Myocardial Infarction Due to Microvascular Obstruction in a Young Woman Who Recently Recovered from COVID-19 Infection.

Although cardiovascular complications are common in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, those with milder cases who recovered at home are less studied. Here, we report the case of a young woman who recently recovered from COVID-19 at home. A week after recovery, she was admitted to our institution with acute chest pain, signs of ischemia on the electrocardiogram and elevated cardiac troponins. Coronary angiography showed normal epicardial coronary arteries, but the cardiac magnetic resonance showed transmural late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in the mid-ventricular level of the lateral wall. The findings were strongly suggestive of a minor transmural myocardial infarction. This case report highlights the role of multimodality imaging in detecting cardiac injury in COVID-19 patients as well as the fact that mild COVID-19 cases who recovered at home are also exposed to thromboembolic events during the convalescent period.

Sex-Related Procedural Aspects and Complications in CRT Survey II: A Multicenter European Experience in 11,088 Patients.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare sex difference for procedural aspects and complications in the European Society of Cardiology CRT Survey II, exploring whether adverse events were related to the type of CRT device implanted. BACKGROUND: Sex-related differences in procedural aspects and complications in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation has not been explored in a real-life population. METHODS: A post-hoc analysis of procedural data and complications in different sexes and factors associated with events was performed from data collected in the European Society of Cardiology CRT Survey II. RESULTS: Of all patients (n = 11,088) included, 24.3% were women. The mean age (70 years of age) of male and female recipients was similar. Female patients more frequently had an idiopathic cardiomyopathy (67.4% vs. 44.1%) and fewer comorbidities, including atrial fibrillation (34.8% vs. 42.8%), diabetes (29.1% vs. 32.1%), chronic obstructive lung disease (10.3% vs. 12.6%), and renal failure (28.7% vs. 31.9%), compared with men. More women compared with men had a pacemaker (56.6% vs. 46.3%) and much less often an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (CRT-D) (19.0% vs. 34.7%) implant. Periprocedural event rate was the highest in women with CRT with defibrillator (7.1% vs. 4.8% in men), followed by women with a CRT with pacing (5.5% vs. 4.4% in men). The higher periprocedural event rate in CRT-D women was attributable primarily to the occurrence of pneumothorax (1.4%), coronary sinus dissection (2.1%), and pericardial tamponade (0.3%). The rate of in-hospital major adverse events (6.0%) and complications necessitating reoperation (4.0%) was not different among sex and device type. CONCLUSIONS: Women are more likely to experience adverse procedure-related events during CRT implantation. Thus, preventive strategies should be employed to minimize complication rate.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator: what determines the choice?-findings from the ESC CRT Survey II.

AIMS: The decision to implant a cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker (CRT-P) or a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) may be challenging. There are no clear guideline recommendations as no randomized study of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been designed to compare the effects of CRT-P with those of CRT-D on patients' outcomes. In the CRT Survey II, we studied patient and implantation centre characteristics associated with the choice of CRT-P vs. CRT-D. METHODS AND RESULTS: Clinical practice data from 10 692 patients undergoing CRT implantation of whom 7467 (70%) patients received a CRT-D and 3225 (30%) received a CRT-P across 42 ESC countries were collected and analysed between October 2015 and January 2017. Factors favouring the selection of CRT-P implantation included age >75 years, female gender, non-ischaemic heart failure (HF) aetiology, New York Heart Association functional Class III/IV symptoms, left ventricular ejection fraction >25%, atrial fibrillation, atrioventricular (AV) block II/III, and implantation in a university hospital. CONCLUSION: In a large cohort from the CRT Survey II, we found that patients allocated to receive CRT-P exhibited particular phenotypes with more symptomatic HF, more frequent comorbidities, advanced age, female gender, non-ischaemic HF aetiology, atrial fibrillation, and evidence of AV block. There were substantial differences in the proportion of patients allocated to receive CRT-P vs. CRT-D between countries.

Contemporary practice of CRT implantation in scandinavia compared to Europe.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the contemporary practice of CRT implantation in Scandinavia and Europe. DESIGN: We used data from The European CRT Survey II to highlight similarities and differences in the practice of CRT implantation between Europe (EUR) and Scandinavia (SCAND) and between the Scandinavian countries Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Implant data from the national pacemaker registries were used to calculate coverage. RESULTS: The coverage was 24% in SCAND and 11% in EUR. SCAND patients were more often referred from another centre and follow-up was less often to be performed at the operating centre. Telemonitoring was more commonly used. More patients had AV-block or pacemaker dependency/expected high RV pacing percentage as indication for CRT. A CRT-P was more commonly used, and ischaemic aetiology was slightly less common. Echocardiography was more often used to determine LVEF, as well as occlusive venography and placing the RV lead first. In DK implanters tended to choose a septal RV position. Quadripolar leads were more often and a test shock less often used. The paced QRS duration was slightly longer and the narrowing of QRS with CRT more limited. Procedure times and preoperative LVEF were similar. CONCLUSIONS: In Scandinavia AV-conduction disturbance and/or a ventricular pacing indication was a more common indication for CRT, suggesting adaptation of the most recent guidelines ahead of their publication. A test shock was almost never performed, in agreement with recent scientific evidence. CRT-P was more often used, the procedures seem more centralized and quadripolar leads were preferred.

Upgrades from a previous device compared to de novo cardiac resynchronization therapy in the European Society of Cardiology CRT Survey II.

BACKGROUND: To date, there are no data from randomized controlled studies on the benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) when implanted as an upgrade in patients with a previous device as compared to de novo CRT. In the CRT Survey II we compared the baseline data of patients upgraded to CRT (CRT-P/CRT-D) from a previous pacemaker (PM) or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) to de novo CRT implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the European CRT Survey II, clinical practice data of patients undergoing CRT and/or ICD implantation across 42 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) countries were collected between October 2015 and December 2016. Out of a total of 11 088 patients, 2396 (23.2%) were upgraded from a previous PM or ICD and 7933 (76.8%) underwent de novo implantation. Compared to de novo implantations, upgraded patients were older, more often male, more frequently had ischaemic heart failure aetiology, atrial fibrillation, reduced renal function, worse heart failure symptoms, and higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels. Upgraded patients were more often PM-dependent and less frequently received CRT-D. Total peri-procedural, in-hospital complications and length of hospital stay were similar. Upgraded patients were less frequently treated with heart failure medication at discharge. CONCLUSION: Despite a lack of evidenced-based data, close to one quarter of all CRT implantations across 42 ESC countries were upgrades from a previous PM or ICD. Despite older age and worse symptoms, the CRT implantation procedures in upgraded patients were equally frequently successful and complications similar to de novo implantations. These results call for more studies.

CRT Survey II: a European Society of Cardiology survey of cardiac resynchronisation therapy in 11 088 patients-who is doing what to whom and how?

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) reduces morbidity and mortality in appropriately selected patients with heart failure and is strongly recommended for such patients by guidelines. A European Society of Cardiology (ESC) CRT survey conducted in 2008-2009 showed considerable variation in guideline adherence and large individual, national and regional differences in patient selection, implantation practice and follow-up. Accordingly, two ESC associations, the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Failure Association, designed a second prospective survey to describe contemporary clinical practice regarding CRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: A survey of the clinical practice of CRT-P and CRT-D implantation was conducted from October 2015 to December 2016 in 42 ESC member countries. Implanting centres provided information about their hospital and CRT service and were asked to complete a web-based case report form collecting information on patient characteristics, investigations, implantation procedures and complications during the index hospitalisation. The 11 088 patients enrolled represented 11% of the total number of expected implantations in participating countries during the survey period; 32% of patients were aged ≥75 years, 28% of procedures were upgrades from a permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and 30% were CRT-P rather than CRT-D. Most patients (88%) had a QRS duration ≥130 ms, 73% had left bundle branch block and 26% were in atrial fibrillation at the time of implantation. Large geographical variations in clinical practice were observed. CONCLUSION: CRT Survey II provides a valuable source of information on contemporary clinical practice with respect to CRT implantation in a large sample of ESC member states. The survey permits assessment of guideline adherence and demonstrates variations in patient selection, management, implantation procedure and follow-up strategy.

A 2-step optical coherence tomography guided therapeutic approach to acute myocardial infarction secondary to stent thrombosis.

UNLABELLED: Myocardial infarction secondary to stent thrombosis has high mortality and recurrence rate. Emergency PCI has high risk of no-reflow. We used a 2-step approach of early recanalization with minimal mechanical intervention followed by delayed PCI 1-2days later guided by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). From October 2011 to December 2013, we treated 5 patients with this approach. Time from early recanalization to the delayed definitive PCI was 1day (median, range 1-3days). All the OCT images were diagnostic with a clear view of the underlying structures. SUMMARY: A 2-step approach to treat stent thrombosis appears beneficial with low incidence of peri-procedural thrombosis or no-reflow phenomena during the second step, and superb OCT imaging.

Clinical characteristics, angiographic findings, and one-year outcome of 101 consecutive stent thrombosis cases in British Columbia.

BACKGROUND: Stent thrombosis (ST) is rare, but is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. METHODS: We analyzed data from the British Columbia (BC) Registry from April 2011-January 2012. RESULTS: 101 ST cases were reported and verified. Based on timing, ST was considered early (≤30days) in 35.6%, late (>30days-1year) in 17.8% and very late (>1year) in 46.5%. The majority (68.5%) presented with STEMI, and the remaining with non-STEMI (31.5%). Most vessels were functionally occluded (TIM1 flow grade ≤1 in 67.1%). Thrombus burden was high (TIMI thrombus grade ≥4 in 77.2%). Aspiration thrombectomy was performed in 41% of cases. New stents were implanted in 62.4% cases. Intra-coronary imaging was low (11%). At the original stent implantation, STEMI was the clinical presentation in 39.6%, the lesion was complex in 62.1%, and thrombus was visualized in 23.0%. Prognosis after ST was unfavorable with high mortality (11.9% at 30days and 16.8% at one year), and further revascularization (5.0% repeat PCI and 6.9% coronary artery bypass graft surgery). Early ST was associated with worse clinical outcome compared to late/very late ST: 30-day mortality at 22.2% versus 6.2% (p=0.02), and 1-year mortality at 27.8% versus 10.8% (p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective registry from BC, all ST presented with myocardial infarction, and the majority was treated with emergency PCI. Additional stents were commonly implanted with infrequent use of intracoronary imaging. Mortality rate was higher for early ST in comparison with late/very late ST. A comprehensive approach should be developed to treat this difficult complication.

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) evaluation of intermediate coronary lesions in patients with NSTEMI.

INTRODUCTION: Coronary angiography is commonly performed following non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) to assess the need for revascularization. Some of these patients have myocardial infarction (MI) with no obstructive coronary atherosclerosis (MINOCA). Patients without severe obstructive lesions are usually treated conservatively. However, coronary angiography has known limitations in the assessment of lesion severity. We report our experience of using coronary Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) in a series of patients without severe obstructive coronary lesions. METHODS: 165 patients underwent coronary OCT at Vancouver General Hospital. NSTEMI was the clinical presentation in 70 patients and 26 had angiographically intermediate lesions with 40%-69% diameter stenosis. Prior to OCT image acquisition, intracoronary nitroglycerin 100-200µg was administered. Blood in the vessel was displaced using contrast media by manual injections. RESULTS: OCT of the angiographically intermediate lesions showed larger minimal luminal area (MLA) than the angiographically severe lesions (MLA 3.3mm(2)±1.8mm(2) vs. 1.6mm(2)±0.6mm(2), p<0.001) and less severe % lumen area stenosis (54.2%±11.4% vs. 70.9%±6.8%, p=0.001). Plaque rupture or intracoronary thrombus was detected in 8/26 (31%) patients. PCI with stent deployment was performed in 16 patients (62%). CONCLUSION: In stabilized patients with NSTEMI and angiographically intermediate disease, OCT examination confirmed the lack of severe anatomical stenosis in most patients. However, OCT also identified coronary lesions with unstable features. Further research is needed to help guide management of this subgroup of patients.

European cardiac resynchronization therapy survey II: rationale and design.

The Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) Survey II is a 6 months snapshot survey initiated by two ESC Associations, the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Failure Association, which is designed to describe clinical practice regarding implantation of CRT devices in a broad sample of hospitals in 47 ESC member countries. The large volume of clinical and demographic data collected should reflect current patient selection, implantation, and follow-up practice and provide information relevant for assessing healthcare resource utilization in connection with CRT. The findings of this survey should permit representative benchmarking both nationally and internationally across Europe.

Trapped rotablation wire causing longitudinal stent deformation.

Longitudinal stent deformation is a recently described complication of percutaneous coronary intervention. It can lead to serious adverse outcomes. The precipitating mechanisms and treatment strategies have been described. We report a case of longitudinal stent deformation that occurred with the removal of a trapped rotablation guide wire.

The European CRT Survey: 1 year (9-15 months) follow-up results.

AIMS: The European CRT Survey is a joint initiative of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the European Society of Cardiology evaluating the contemporary implantation practice of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in Europe. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients who had a successful CRT implantation were enrolled from 141 centres in 13 countries between November 2008 and June 2009. Baseline demographics, clinical and implantation data were collected, with a follow-up of ∼1 year (9-15 months). The current report describes clinical outcomes including symptom severity, cardiovascular (CV) hospitalization, and survival. A total of 2438 patients were enrolled, and follow-up data were acquired from 2111 patients (87%). The population included important groups of patients poorly represented in randomized controlled trials, including very elderly patients and those with prior device implantation, atrial fibrillation, and/or QRS duration <120 ms. Investigators reported substantial improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class at follow-up. Patient self-assessment indicated that 81% of the patients felt improved, 16% reported no change, and 4% reported deterioration. During follow-up, 207 (10%) patients died, 346 (16%) had a CV hospitalization, and 501 (24%) died or had CV hospitalization. Worse NYHA functional class, atrial fibrillation, ischaemic aetiology, and device type (CRT-P, i.e. CRT alone) were associated with poorer survival. Women had a better outcome, as did patients who had a CRT-D (with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator function) device. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes including death and hospitalization in this European CRT survey were consistent with results from clinical trials of CRT. At 1 year follow-up, most patients who received a CRT device considered their symptoms improved compared with their pre-implant assessment. Although prospective, this is an observational study of successful CRT implantations, and outcomes in subgroup analyses must be interpreted with appropriate conservatism.

The European Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Survey: comparison of outcomes between de novo cardiac resynchronization therapy implantations and upgrades.

AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective treatment for a subset of patients with chronic heart failure. Data on the benefit of CRT in heart failure patients with previous right ventricular pacemakers or standard defibrillators are sparse. METHODS AND RESULTS: The European (HFA, Heart Failure Association/EHRA, European Heart Rhythm Association) CRT Survey enrolled patients from 141 centres in 13 countries in Europe collecting baseline demographic, echocardiographic, clinical, and implant data, with follow-up at ∼1 year. The present analysis reports implantation data and 1 year outcomes regarding New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, global patient assessment, hospitalizations, complications, and mortality in patients undergoing de novo CRT implantations compared with those receiving an upgrade of a previously implanted device (pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators). This analysis includes 2367 CRT implant procedures of which 692 (28%) were upgrades to CRT. Distribution of NYHA functional class and left ventricular function were similar between the groups. Procedural duration was also similar, although fluoroscopy time was shorter in the 'upgrades'. There was no difference in the frequency of peri-procedural complications. There were similar improvements in NYHA functional class and similar reduction in QRS duration, but more patients reported unchanged global assessment status in the upgraded group. Total and cause-specific mortality at 1 year was low and the same in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: More than one quarter of all CRT procedures are upgrades from existing systems, although this group has not been subject to randomized clinical trials. Our data suggest that there are no significant differences in clinical outcomes or complication rates between upgrades and de novo procedures. Clinical study no NCT 01185392.

The European cardiac resynchronization therapy survey: patient selection and implantation practice vary according to centre volume.

AIMS: The European cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) survey is a joint initiative taken by the Heart Failure Association and the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology with the primary objective of describing current European practice associated with CRT implantations. The results demonstrated that a substantial number of implantations took place in patients without conventional guideline indications. We investigated whether the volume of implants per centre was a determinant of the propensity to use devices for 'off-label' indications. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and forty-one centres from 13 European countries contributed data from consecutive patients successfully implanted with a CRT-P or CRT-D device between November 2008 and June 2009. Centres were categorized into low volume (LVol; ≤ 120 implantations/year) and high volume (HVol; >120 implantations/year) based on median implantable cardioverter-defibrilator implantation the previous year. No differences were noted with regard to sex, age, or peri-procedural and device-related complications. High-volume centres implanted CRT devices in significantly more patients with mild symptoms and a narrow QRS width. The procedure and fluoroscopy times were substantially longer at LVol centres and devices were more frequently implanted by surgeons and interventional cardiologists. Patients stayed longer in hospital in LVol centres with a median of 4 (2-9) vs. 2 (2-6) days. CONCLUSIONS: High-volume centres explore newer indications in their CRT practice and implant devices more frequently in patients with mild symptoms and narrow QRS durations. Electrophysiologists dominate implantation practice at HVol centres and duration of hospitalization is substantially shorter at these centres.