[Mini-invasive double-incision for patellar tendon harvesting in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction]. / Prélèvement du transplant patellaire par double voie mini invasive dans la reconstruction du ligament croisé antérieur.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Injury to infrapatellar branches of the medial saphenous nerve are incriminated in disorders of the anterior aspect of the knee, particularly following bone-tendon-bone reconstruction. We demonstrated in prior anatomic work the usefulness of using a double-incision minimal approach for harvesting the patellar transplant in order to spare the nerve branches. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The patellar transplant is harvested via two vertical incisions, one on the apex of the patella and the other along the protrusion of the anterior tibial tubercle. After harvesting the bony transplant from the patella, discision of the patellar tendon fibers is advanced subcutaneously towards the anterior tibial tubercle, allowing extraction of the patellar graft via the tibial incision using a small forceps and respecting the peritendon. The tibial bone is then harvested. The standard anterolateral and anteromedial approaches are used for the ligament reconstruction. RESULTS: We have conducted a case control study between this harvesting technique using the double-incision technique (42 knees) versus the conventional single incision harvesting technique. We studied the influence of the harvesting technique on anterior knee pain, the surface area of the sensorial disorders involving the anterior aspect of the knee, and kneeling problems. DISCUSSION: Our technique has enabled a significant decrease in the surface area of sensorial disorders (7.4 cm2 versus 17.4 cm2) and problems kneeling compared with the conventional method.

Systematic pinning of displaced extension-type supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. A prospective study of 116 consecutive patients.

We report the results of 116 consecutive displaced extension supracondylar fractures of the elbow in children treated during the first two years after the introduction of the following protocol; closed reduction under general anaesthesia with fluoroscopic control and lateral percutaneous pinning using two parallel pins or, when closed reduction failed, open reduction and internal fixation by cross-pinning. Eight patients were lost to follow-up during the first postoperative year. The mean follow-up for the remaining 108 was 27.9 months (12 to 47, median 26.5). At the final follow-up, using Flynn's overall modified classification, the clinical result was considered to be excellent in 99 patients (91.6%), good in five (4.6%) and poor in four (3.7%). All the poor results were due to a poor cosmetic result, but had good or excellent function. Technical error in the initial management of these four cases was thought to be the cause of the poor results. The protocol described resulted in good or excellent results in 96% of our patients, providing a safe and efficient treatment for displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus even in less experienced hands.