Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Int J Mol Sci ; 21(8)2020 Apr 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32326126

RESUMO

Accumulating evidence indicates that microbiota plays a critical role in physiological processes in humans. However, it might also contribute to body malodor by producing numerous odorous molecules such as ammonia, volatile sulfur compounds or trimethylamine. Although malodor is commonly overlooked by physicians, it constitutes a major problem for many otherwise healthy people. Thus, this review aims to investigate most common causes of malodor and describe potential therapeutic options. We searched PUBMED and Google Scholar databases to identify the clinical and pre-clinical studies on bad body smell, malodor, halitosis and microbiota. Unpleasant smell might originate from the mouth, skin, urine or reproductive fluids and is usually caused by odorants that are produced by resident bacterial flora. The accumulation of odorous compounds might result from diet, specific composition of microbiota, as well as compromised function of the liver, intestines and kidneys. Evidence-based guidelines for management of body malodor are lacking and no universal treatment exists. However, the alleviation of the symptoms may be achieved by controlling the diet and physical elimination of bacteria and/or accumulated odorants.


Assuntos
Microbiota , Odorantes , Animais , Bactérias/metabolismo , Líquidos Corporais , Disbiose , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Halitose/diagnóstico , Halitose/etiologia , Halitose/terapia , Interações Hospedeiro-Patógeno , Humanos , Metilaminas/metabolismo , Metilaminas/urina , Saliva/microbiologia , Compostos de Enxofre/metabolismo , Compostos de Enxofre/urina , Suor , Compostos Orgânicos Voláteis
3.
Dermatol Surg ; 45(8): 1042-1046, 2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30893152

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) surgical checklist is associated with reduced morbidity and mortality. Efficacy correlates with compliance. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to (1) establish completion rate and (2) identify and address barriers to use. METHODS: Records of patients undergoing dermatological surgery were studied. Staff completed attitude and barriers questionnaires. Checklist process was modified, and use was reassessed twice. RESULTS: Cycle 1 involved 217 subjects; 72% had excisions. Thirteen percent had surgery to multiple sites. Five percent of checklists were fully completed, with an average of 76% of available points per checklist marked as checked. The lowest single field use included "patient identity" (76%) and "surgical site" (72%). Questionnaire responses from 25 staff showed the checklist to be "important" and "relevant" in dermatology; key barrier to completion was lack of time. Checklist modifications and educational sessions were undertaken; checklist use was reassessed twice more with 103 and 134 patients. Average use increased to 96% and 98%; full completion increased to 71% and 70%; "surgical site" and "identity" completion increased to 100%. CONCLUSION: The WHO checklist is relevant and important in dermatology. Introduction must be supported by repeated training sessions. Adequate time and training can significantly improve checklist completion and patient safety.


Assuntos
Lista de Checagem/normas , Dermatologia/normas , Segurança do Paciente/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/normas , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/normas , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Salas Cirúrgicas/normas , Organização Mundial da Saúde , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...